User talk:Professor Proof

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Professor Proof, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Professor Proof! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Professor Proof! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 01:50, Sunday, May 13, 2018 (UTC)


Thanks for helping out at peer review![edit]

The Peer Review Barnstar
Thanks for your help at Wikipedia peer review! --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help and energy at peer review! --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fitz-Gerald[edit]

I just wanted to say, the fact that you figured out that it was Fitz-Gerald and not Fitzgerald is amazing. That has to either be the funniest or lamest last name ever. Next thing we'll get Ken-Eddy, or something like that. Thank you so much. DaCashman (talk) 04:46, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DaCashman, thanks for reaching out to me and saying that. You made me happy. In case you're wondering how I did it, I tried to look her up (because she wasn't on the disambiguation page) and after some narrowing down I found her. So, it wasn't that difficult (the difficult part was to make sure her name is really Fitz-Gerald, because all sources in her article were dead links except her campaign site URL, which now redirects to this) but I appreciate your kind words nonetheless. Professor Proof (talk) 11:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment[edit]

Thanks for your input at Ahed Tamimi. This week, I have been ill and have not been as active as usual. I will be back and leave a thoughtful reply as soon as possible. Thanks, again!TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind and timely reply, and I hope you'll get better soon. Don't feel as if you should prioritize it over other Wikipedia-related things, my comments (if they can be called that) can definitely wait until you feel like addressing them. Professor Proof (talk) 16:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review newsletter #1[edit]

Introduction[edit]

Hello to all! I do not intend to write a regular peer review newsletter but there does occasionally come a time when those interested in contributing to peer review should be contacted, and now is one. I've mailed this out to everyone on the peer review volunteers list, and some editors that have contributed to past discussions. Apologies if I've left you off or contacted you and you didn't want it. Next time there is a newsletter / mass message it will be opt in (here), I'll talk about this below - but first:

  • THANK YOU! I want to thank you for your contributions and for volunteering on the list to help out at peer review. Thank you!
  • Peer review is useful! It's good to have an active peer review process. This is often the way that we help new or developing editors understand our ways, and improve the quality of their editing - so it fills an important and necessary gap between the teahouse (kindly introduction to our Wikiways) and GA and FA reviews (specific standards uphelp according to a set of quality criteria). And we should try and improve this process where possible (automate, simplify) so it can be used and maintained easily.

Updates[edit]

It can get quite lonely tinkering with peer review...
With a bit of effort we can renovate the place to look like this!

Update #1: the peer review volunteers list is changing[edit]

The list is here in case you've forgotten: WP:PRV. Kadane has kindly offered to create a bot that will ping editors on the volunteers list with unanswered reviews in their chosen subject areas every so often. You can choose the time interval by changing the "contact" parameter. Options are "never", "monthly", "quarterly", "halfyearly", and "annually". For example:

  • {{PRV|JohnSmith|History of engineering|contact=monthly}} - if placed in the "History" section, JohnSmith will receive an automatic update every month about unanswered peer reviews relating to history.
  • {{PRV|JaneSmith|Mesopotamian geography, Norwegian fjords|contact=annually}} - if placed in the "Geography" section, JaneSmith will receive an automatic update every yearly about unanswered peer reviews in the geography area.

We can at this stage only use the broad peer review section titles to guide what reviews you'd like, but that's better than nothing! You can also set an interest in multiple separate subject areas that will be updated at different times.

Update #2: a (lean) WikiProject Peer review[edit]

I don't think we need a WikiProject with a giant bureaucracy nor all sorts of whiz-bang features. However over the last few years I've found there are times when it would have been useful to have a list of editors that would like to contribute to discussions about the peer review process (e.g. instructions, layout, automation, simplification etc.). Also, it can get kind of lonely on the talk page as I am (correct me if I'm wrong) the only regular contributor, with most editors moving on after 6 - 12 months.

So, I've decided to create "WikiProject Peer review". If you'd like to contribute to the WikiProject, or make yourself available for future newsletters or contact, please add yourself to the list of members.

Update #3: advertising[edit]

We plan to do some advertising of peer review, to let editors know about it and how to volunteer to help, at a couple of different venues (Signpost, Village pump, Teahouse etc.) - but have been waiting until we get this bot + WikiProject set up so we have a way to help interested editors make more enduring contributions. So consider yourself forewarned!

And... that's it!

I wish you all well on your Wikivoyages, Tom (LT) (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]