User talk:Psantora/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 10

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apple Watch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages GB, LTE and MB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

This Sunday! Wikipedia Day NYC Celebration and Mini-Conference (updated speakers + schedule)

Sunday January 14: Wikipedia Day NYC 2018

Part of Wikipedia's global 17th birthday celebration, Wikipedia Day NYC 2018 at Ace Hotel will include a mini-conference of scheduled panels as well as unconference style talks and discussions proposed by attendees on the day of the event. We are very excited to announce speakers such as Jason Scott (Internet Archive), Jackie Koerner (Visiting Scholar, Wiki Ed), and Andrew Lih (Wikimedia DC), as well as a fantastic line-up of panels that highlight projects and issues of relevance to the Wikimedia NYC community.

See Wikipedia Day NYC 2018 speakers + schedule

And there will be cake.

We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

10:00am - 6:30 pm at Ace Hotel, 20 West 29th Street in Manhattan

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Megs (talk) 02:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Pye, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Edward Ward and Estonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Italics in Template:Unix

It should be documented (I thought it was documented, but I may have been thinking of Template:Power Architecture), but italicized OSes in Template:Unix are dead/discontinued/no-longer-developed flavors of UN*X. Guy Harris (talk) 19:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

I see. I added some language with that information at the bottom of the template. Feel free to update it as needed. Thanks for the clarification! ~ PaulT+/C 20:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MacOS derivations

Template:MacOS derivations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Codename Lisa (talk) 06:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Wednesday February 21, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants.

We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities.

We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles gallery, 145 West 14th Street
(note the new address, a couple of doors down from the former Babycastles location)

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Megs (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

P.S. You are also invited to Africa and the Diaspora Edit-a-thon @ Schomburg Center for Black Culture on Saturday February 24!

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Apple S1P and S2

Why are you writing that the Apple S1P and S2 are ARMv8 chips when that is not substantiated by the references? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple-designed_processors#S_series_2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supersofts (talkcontribs) 14:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

You are absolutely correct. I have changed those stats to match a new reference. The are v7s, not the 64bit v8. Thanks! ~ PaulT+/C 04:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supersofts (talkcontribs) 14:54, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bunn-O-Matic Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Bunn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

19:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nassim Nicholas Taleb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Brooks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HomePod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reminder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

20:04, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Herald (newspaper) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Herald-Press
Nassim Nicholas Taleb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Berkeley
Stoneman Douglas High School shooting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Depression

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

18:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm ViperSnake151. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, HomePod, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I've never heard of "LeanCrew". By the name alone it sounds like a non-notable and unreliable blog. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:51, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi ViperSnake151, leancrew just happens to be the name of the domain. The author and publisher is Dr. Drang. A well-known, influential, and pseudo-anonymous engineer and tech blogger. A number of other more visible sites linked to his articles about reminders and HomePod, but I thought the reference should be to the original, most comprehensive source of the information, which are Drang's posts on the subject. His posts are often referenced elsewhere. I can add those additional "more popular" sources that reference Drang if you think it will add to the article. Regardless, this discussion easily could have happened on the talk page of the article if you had just explained your actions in the first place. Maybe consider that in the future instead of using an impersonal warning template? - PaulT+/C 16:51, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

IMGSIZE

Hello. WP:IMGSIZE states:

"Except with very good reason, do not use px (e.g. thumb|300px), which forces a fixed image width. In most cases upright=scaling factor should be used, thereby respecting the user's base preference (which may have been selected for that user's particular devices)."

After I removed the fixed image size, linking to IMGSIZE in my edit summary, you reversed that change without giving a "very good reason". There is no indication you even read IMGSIZE, let alone understood it. Please don't do this, and please stop using fixed image sizes at that article and all other articles. IMGSIZE explains how to convert a px value to an equivalent |upright= value.

Editors are gradually converting articles to use |upright= values instead of px values, and that effort is not helped when other editors reverse the changes without basis. If you have any questions, please ping me here. Thank you. ―Mandruss  07:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Take it easy there Mandruss and maybe WP:AGF? I don't think it is reasonable to expect someone to read an article's history before making their first edit to a page, so I had no idea you had linked WP:IMGSIZE. It is a relatively recent change and while I had done some reading on |upright= there (and at MOS:IMGSIZE where the explanation and rationale is much more explicit) in the recent past I hadn't actually seen or edited with it until this page. Additionally, at some point in the past I changed my default image size to 400px, which caused both images in the article to be rendered way too large. I've since reverted my preferences back to the default 220px and I'll be using |upright= going forward with the default image size in mind.
I'd appreciate it if you weren't condescending (There is no indication you even read IMGSIZE, let alone understood it.). You'll find you generally get much more favorable results when interacting with other editors if you assume good faith. After all, this is a collaborative project and having productive discussions with other wikipedians is essential to that objective. My edit was a perfectly acceptable part of the WP:BRD cycle and all you had to do was mention me on the talk page of the article with a short explanation of the policy. I would have seen it and agreed with you and even thanked you for bringing it to my attention. There is no reason to negatively question if I read or understood a policy correctly. It just isn't productive. Happy editing, - PaulT+/C 14:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
First, I didn't question your good faith. I questioned your judgment in one small area, that of recent page history awareness. Good faith is about honesty, as seen in the dictionary entry, and I have no reason to doubt your honesty. It's important to understand WP:AGF and avoid misapplying it, and there is no WP:AGJ.
I admit I thought you had edited there before, and my apologies for that error. Still I don't know why, after reading MOS:IMGSIZE, one would use a px value for any ordinary thumbnail, let alone change an existing upright to a px value. Thanks for the response. ―Mandruss  15:16, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
I was about to reference WP:AVOIDYOU and then saw my hypocrisy. My apologies for responding with that 2nd paragraph, consider it redacted. Regarding judgement vs faith... really? It's generally about working toward improving the project, which I think we are both trying to do. Regardless, it wasn't fair for me to reference it in the first place and so I've redacted it as well. - PaulT+/C 15:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
I don't wish to badger, but I'll take the question mark as an invitation to continue. Yes, "please AGF" is very often a response to constructive criticism, and that's incorrect as I understand it. Constructive criticism is essential to the work, and precious few editors have the ability to give it without sometimes hurting one's feelings or sounding condescending. I'm not one of them, to my regret. Had I realized that was your first edit at the article, my tone would have been a bit softer, however. ―Mandruss  16:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Badger isn't accurate, or at least not to me. I think we are generally in agreement. I think the only point I'm trying to make is regarding "the ability" you referenced. It is something I need to work on too (see the redactions) and I've found that being "a bit softer" is almost always better.¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I read your response as splitting hairs regarding the spirit vs letter of the guideline, hence the "really?". I didn't interpret all of what you wrote as constructive criticism, but I see now that was your intent. My responses here have been attempts at constructive criticism as well. I think a better approach would have been to revert and discuss on the article talk page with a bit more of an open mind. Having said all that, I think I'm bordering on badgering now... - PaulT+/C 17:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited March for Our Lives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WUSA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Special Counsel investigation (2017–present) revert

You'd have to ask User:Dispenser, but I'm pretty sure it's not a bug to remove those links and instead intentional cleanup per WP:DUPLINK. I'm indifferent toward them, though, and it does look like it was applied inconsistently. Sorry for the time you took to check it out and revert. —Ost (talk) 16:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ost316, no worries it didn't take very long to fix. I mainly wanted to make you aware of the issue. Just FYI, links in references are preferred per WP:DUPLINK: Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers, a link may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, hatnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead. (I added bold for emphasis). The idea is that if someone is checking up on a reference they haven't necessarily seen an earlier link in the article and it is generally considered good practice to include links in references where possible and useful. Thanks for the follow-up. - PaulT+/C 16:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification so that I can be more careful in the future. I like your rationale for why the link would be "helpful to the readers" and repeatable, though I recall consensus being less clear on that at one point. —Ost (talk) 17:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Godwin's Law joke

Probably best to leave it out, but I thought it was pretty funny. XD NekoKatsun (talk) 20:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Not my best work, but not terrible. I can do better. - PaulT+/C 02:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

15:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Links in cite template

Please stop adding links to the names of publishers and locations in cite temppates. We generally do not do this. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi there Beyond My Ken, I do not think you are right about that. See MOS:DUPLINK where it states: if helpful for readers, a link may be repeated in ... footnotes. I'm happy to have a larger discussion about this with others in a more appropriate place, but I do not agree that "we generally do not do this" is accurate. Can you cite a policy somewhere disputing this? - PaulT+/C 14:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Well, let's say in my almost 13 years and 220,000 edits of experience, 70+% to articles, I have not come across it often, very rarely, actually. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Um, ok? Doesn't change the fact that "We generally do not do this." is not accurate just because you do not generally do this. Please cite some policy supporting your assertion. - PaulT+/C 15:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
I've reverted the linking of locations since those are generally redundant per the language here: Template:Citation#Publisher. I think the links to publishers are relevant and so I left them in.
Note that you also removed other improvements to those templates when you wholesale reverted my changes, including the addition of |page= and |pages= in one case. Please be more careful when making changes in the future. - PaulT+/C 15:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
No one looks at a reference and says to themselves "Oh, I've just got to learn more about Yale University Press", so your links are definitely violations of WP:OVERLINK. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
In the context of a reference, the publisher is absolutely relevant and WP:OVERLINK encourages that kind of link. For example, someone may want to get a better understanding of the quality of the reference and something published by Yale University Press would carry more weight than something published by Phoenix University, but unless you are already familiar with both entities you wouldn't know that without the aid of the link. Your opinion isn't the only thing under consideration for these disputed links. This is an encyclopedia, not BMK's playground. - PaulT+/C 04:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

AN/I

A report concerning your editing behavior has been filed at AN/I. You can find it here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Stormy Daniels scandal on Trump series template

Regarding your edit, you say that the event happened during the election. That is true, but it didn't influence the election in any way since it went public just this year. For reference, the article United States presidential election, 2016 doesn't mention the scandal at all. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) wumbolo ^^^ 19:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Nassim nicholas Taleb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nassim nicholas Taleb. Since you had some involvement with the Nassim nicholas Taleb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:29, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas nassim Taleb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nicholas nassim Taleb. Since you had some involvement with the Nicholas nassim Taleb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:31, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas nassim taleb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nicholas nassim taleb. Since you had some involvement with the Nicholas nassim taleb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:32, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas Nassim taleb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nicholas Nassim taleb. Since you had some involvement with the Nicholas Nassim taleb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas taleb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nicholas taleb. Since you had some involvement with the Nicholas taleb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Nasim nicholas Taleb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nasim nicholas Taleb. Since you had some involvement with the Nasim nicholas Taleb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas Nasim Taleb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nicholas Nasim Taleb. Since you had some involvement with the Nicholas Nasim Taleb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:35, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas Nasim taleb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nicholas Nasim taleb. Since you had some involvement with the Nicholas Nasim taleb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:36, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas nasim taleb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nicholas nasim taleb. Since you had some involvement with the Nicholas nasim taleb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:36, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas nasim Taleb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nicholas nasim Taleb. Since you had some involvement with the Nicholas nasim Taleb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:36, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

18:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

16:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

22:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

17:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Wednesday May 23, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants.

We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities.

We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles gallery, 145 West 14th Street
(note the new address, a couple of doors down from the former Babycastles location)

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S. You are also invited to Action = History: Wikipedia Edit-a-thon for Asian American Literature on Sunday May 27!

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeannie Rhee has been accepted

Jeannie Rhee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 07:34, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

12:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

21:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)