User talk:Psbsub

Feel free to talk.

promotional? how?

i fail to see how it was advertising. The Mirror, is Malton's newspaper, that is a fact, not an advertisement. Tuvok649 (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2010 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuvok649 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I was way too harsh. The italicization of the "the" set me off, but sure, feel free to add back the section. –Psbsub (talk) 09:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

-It's okay, i welcome the feedback though, on how it was written. I will not italicize 'the'. If you have any other pointers, i'm all ears. Tuvok649 (talk) 16:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Glufer pareef

Just a FYI- It can been marked as Pure Vandalism, due to blatant misinformation. Pretty obvious that it's all fake. Thanks --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 04:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining the Pure Vandalism category. Psbsub (talk) 04:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

No Problem. This is a good link if you're doing Wikipedia:New pages patrol:

Explaining Speedy Deletion categories --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 04:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Possible copyright issue with Highway 69 (Ontario)

I meant to quote the website, not take its material. I will fix this issue immediately. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. The owner of TheKingsHighway.ca knows i'm not trying to commit copyright infringement or steal his data. RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 15:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Warning

Can you tell me why you edit conflicted me and warned User 58.168.103.176 before me? I reverted the edit, you should not try and jump over other editors and beat them to the post. — Deon555^talk_{I'm BACK!} 10:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry. I use WP:TW to make semi-automated edits and didn't notice that you already reverted the edit. I'll keep a closer eye on the messages from now on.

Who do I think I am?

WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.72.56.14 (talk) 13:39, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I think I'm a human being, as opposed to a bot, even though I might act like one.

about Wikimapia page

Hi, why do you rolled back to the previous revision in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiMapia? I just delete information about "commercial, privately owned company" and update statistics. All companies in the world are privately owned, it's not the reason to write this information just after the title. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Budyakov (talk • contribs) 09:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Not every company in the world is privately owned. Creative commons organizations are held in a public trust. Decisions are made by the public instead of by fiat by the owners. Wikimapia is privately owned and they specifically state in their terms of service agreement that they can add fees whenever they want. Please check the link and read the service agreement. There is a common misconception that Wikimapia will always be free and people think they are contributing to a perpetually free resource. That is not true and you are perpetuating that misconception by stating that it is free "at any time." Openstreetmaps is creative commons. Wikipedia is creative commons. Wikimapia is not.Peace01234 (talk) 09:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Clean-up templates

Just to let you know that most clean-up templates, like "{{Unreferenced}}", "{{Fact}}" (Citation needed) and "{{Weasel words}}" etc., are best not "subst"ed . See WP:SUBST for more details. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 17:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC).

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Brampton Züm

Hello, Psbsub. You have new messages at Talk:Züm.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination of Second Line West (Mississauga) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Second Line West (Mississauga) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Line West (Mississauga) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 18:11, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?

Hi Psbsub, You recently received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions:

1. Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
2. If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
3. What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?

You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchukwikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Psbsub. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Psbsub. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)