User talk:Publius Obsequium

Publius Obsequium, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Publius Obsequium! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

What are your favorite sources?

Hi, Publius Obsequium,

I see you've just begun editing several articles on my watchlist. Welcome aboard. As usual, most of the 6,827,537 articles on Wikipedia still need a lot of improvement, so I'm wondering what sources you would particularly recommend reading for fixing the articles that you follow. I have a set of source lists linked on my user page, and I'm always happy to hear suggestions of reliable secondary sources on the topics I follow. Perhaps you will find some of the sources listed in my source lists helpful as you look over Wikipedia articles. Definitely I'd be glad to hear your opinions on new sources to add to the lists. See you on the wiki. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 14:28, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Let's talk on the relevant article talk page about some of your latest edits

Hi, Publius Obsequium,

Since I see you're still new here, I thought I should mention that the Wikipedian guideline on reliable sources reminds all of us editors to prefer authoritative secondary sources rather than keyword-searching primary sources when editing Wikipedia articles. We can discuss each recent edit on the appropriate article talk page. See you there. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (Watch my talk, How I edit) 02:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=6ybvGHdBVVUDi1D_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_8030X3IBTgtZroN&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:22, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, I'm Marteau. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Starbucks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Marteau (talk) 02:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

In this edit, you asserted that "stereotype threat is no longer considered a valid phenomenon in the field." Can you please substantiate that claim? I'm not necessarily challenging it; I'm neither a psychologist nor a psychometrician so I don't follow all the minute details and developments of testing and measurement theory and I'd like to know more about this topic. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 21:21, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem on SAT

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235378030_An_Examination_of_Stereotype_Threat_Effects_on_Girls'_Mathematics_Performance. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. I have also removed it from Stereotype threat, which is likely where you copied itr from.

In the future, when copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)