User talk:PulitzerPrize2017

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PulitzerPrize2017, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dai Pritchard (talk) 20:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Three Bon Bunnies[edit]

The article Three Bon Bunnies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

either a WP:HOAX or non-notable: unreferenced, no mention of band or singer online, in news archives or in GBooks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dai Pritchard (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Three Bon Bunnies[edit]

A tag has been placed on Three Bon Bunnies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is a blatant hoax, because the link to afro.com is a 404 error.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Snowager (talk) 03:41, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Three Bon Bunnies[edit]

I really have to apologise for how the creation of this article was handled. Accusation of a hoax were thrown about far too soon, before a serious effort was made to find references to verify that the group was both real and notable. So please accept my apologies: I've removed the hoax and deletion tags, and tried to improve the article a little. We do get a lot of subtle attempts at creating hoax articles here on Wikipedia, and I guess I and one other editor were just a little too quick to judge this one as another hoax. Please don't let this unpleasant initial experience put you off editing here, and thank you very much for creating the article. If I can be of any help to you in this or future articles, please give me a shout at my talk page. Thank you, Dai Pritchard (talk) 09:36, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PulitzerPrize2017, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi PulitzerPrize2017! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:PulitzerPrize2017/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam ^Sing! 20:53, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yvonne Lowrene Wright (March 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yvonne Lowrene Wright and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 02:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PulitzerPrize2017 (talk) 20:16, 7 August 2015 (UTC)== Ken Williams (Songwriter, Publisher and Record Producer ==[reply]

""Ken Williams"" (born January 1939) is an African American Grammy Nominated songwriter owner of the music publishing company A-Dish-A-Tunes LLC. He also co-wrote several hit's with songwriter J.R. Bailey the songs including the 1973 Grammy Nominated song, "Everybody Plays the Fool" by The Main Ingredient, "Sweet Music, Soft Lights And You" by Isaac Hayes & Millie Jackson, "Love, Love, Love", which he released in 1972 and was covered the following year by Donny Hathaway, and "Just Me And You" by Erasmus Hall. His song "Let Me Prove My Love to You", which was originally performed by The Main Ingredient, was sampled for Alicia Keys' 2003 single "You Don't Know My Name," the song also won 2004 Grammy award for Best R&B Song of the year.

Albums[edit]

Just Me N' You (MAM #5011) (1974)
www.allmusic.com/.../the-diary-of-alicia-keys-mw0000320100

AllMusic

External Links[edit]

http://www.allmusic.com/artist/ken-williams-mn0001382615 "The 100 Best Songs of 2004". Blender. Alpha Media Group Inc. November 23, 2004. Retrieved May 30, 2009.

"Alicia Keys - You Don't Know My Name (CD) at Discogs". Discogs.com. Retrieved 2012-03-16.

http://www.awardsandshows.com/features/grammy-awards-1973-222.html Ken Williams ••• Top Songs as Writer ••• Music VF, US & UK ... www.musicvf.com/songs.php?page=artist&artist=Ken+Williams&tab... PulitzerPrize2017 (talk) 00:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)PulitzerPrize2017[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yvonne Lowrene Wright (July 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yash! was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yvonne Lowrene Wright and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Yash! ^(Y) 10:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Yvonne Lowrene Wright concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Yvonne Lowrene Wright, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yvonne Lowrene Wright[edit]

Hello, PulitzerPrize2017. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Yvonne Lowrene Wright".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]