User talk:Pushbutton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Push button click[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Push button click, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. slakrtalk / 06:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


November 2007[edit]

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Push button click. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. —slakrtalk / 06:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Push Button Click Logo.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Push Button Click logo.JPG. The copy called Image:Push Button Click logo.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 07:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Push button click[edit]

Push button click, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Push button click satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Push button click and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Push button click during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. slakrtalk / 02:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Push Button Click Logo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Push Button Click Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Altogether more fun big.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Altogether more fun big.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Woolworths (supermarkets)‎, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 11:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Butlins logo large.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Butlins logo large.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:75th anniversary logo large.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:75th anniversary logo large.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Push Button Click and Butlins[edit]

I see a few Deletion debates here for the above article, do you still have the original Article content? Having been to several Push Button Click Productions at Ayr during the 80's I'd certainly be interested in whether we could present it in such a way as to make for a notable article and get it past any potential CFD.

BTW thanks for your recent work on Butlins related articles, as you might tell I'm equally trying to improve Wikipedia's coverage although we really need to get some more secondary source coverage as we are currently too reliant on tertiary sources like Butlinsmemories and Bygonebutlins for our sourcing Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 14:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how I'm supposed to respond to messages on wikipedia so I'll try just typing my response here. I've pretty much given up on the push button click article because I uploaded it several times and it kept getting deleted. As for better sources for Butlin's information you have a good point but I'm not sure where one would find such sources. I did manage to use a couple of references from Butli's own website to back up some of the information I added yesterday but a lot can only really be found on sites like butlinsmemories and bygonebutlins. However if you find any better sources that would be great.

Yes, replying on wikipedia just type your message below the previous one, but start your paragraphs using colons to indent the reply so first reply one colon ":" at the start of each paragraph, reply to that two colons "::", reply to that three colons ":::" and so on. At the end of your reply just add four tildes ~~~~ to attach your signature.
A while back I found this document on Butlin's server. It's heavily slanted towards the past 10 years but contains a lot of good information and a list of other relevant sources. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 22:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info. It's not exactly user-friendly, but I think I can manage to get the hang of that.Pushbutton (talk) 06:57, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Butlins logo large.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Butlins logo large.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:40, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Butlins_logo_75_years.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Butlins_logo_75_years.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COI advice[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Butlins, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Orphaned non-free image File:Butlins logo large.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Butlins logo large.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Butlins logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Butlins logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Butlins logo large.PNG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Butlins logo large.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Skycity-logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Skycity-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Something to Ponder[edit]

Hey Pushbutton,

Sorry I've not been concentrating on Butlin's topics recently, but I turned my attention back to the Billy Butlin article and found something intriguing Three sources:

  1. National Archives
  1. Late 30's Butlins Brochure
  1. 1941 LNER Poster

From the looks of it, Butlin constructed Dovercourt (notable as the location of Hi-de-Hi) and sold holidays there but it was run by Warner. However to absolutely assert this we need further sources on the nature of the "in association with" deal. Wondered if you knew anyone that could shine further light on this - perhaps at Butlins Memories? Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would probably explain why the chalets seen on "Hi de Hi" look so much like the ones at Butlin's! Very interesting news indeed. I do know someone who might have more knowledge of this than me. Rocky Mason was a manager at Butlin's for over 30 years so I will ask him if he knows anything, and if he does have any useful info or other sources he can point us to I'll let you know as soon as possible. To be honest though, after reading the article you linked to, my guess is that whoever wrote that was mistaken in saying Dovercourt camp was built by Butlin's. I think most probably it was built by Warners and operated exclusively by them. The Warners section on butlinsmemories.com states that the camp was aquired by Warners in the 1930s, yet according to the article in your link it was only built about 1937 at the very earliest so it seems unlikely Butlin's would have built it then handed control to one of their competitors within a couple of years. http://www.butlinsmemories.com/warners/camplist.htmPushbutton (talk) 11:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's an mistake, the same architect designed Skegness and the records were taken from his collection identifying Butlins Ltd as the client. A History of the Butlin's Railways also claims the existence of a Butlins Dovercourt train ticket. Sources about the 1938 Kindertransport scheme (for which Dovercourt was requisitioned) claim that it ran as a Butlins for 1 season (I presume 37-38) before closing, whilst personal recollections [1] refer to Warners signs in the camp at that time. It is certainly clear that Post-War it was a purely Warner operation, but it is less clear pre-war. Of course the relationship between Warners and Butlins was different at that time with sources reporting Billy as being on the board of Warners at that period and Warner completing construction of Filey for Butlin a few years later. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 17:51, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes indeed. After a closer review of all this it looks like there absolutely was a connection, probably a very short lived one, between Butlin's and Dovercourt. How odd. On the Butlins Memories site in the Warners section it says it was "aquired by Warners in the 1930s" so it appears it was built by Butlin's prior to that, but Skegness was meant to be the first Butlin's camp and it only opened in 1936, so it begs the question as to when Warners aquired it. I'm receieving emails from several long serving Butlin's managers who worked for the company around that time so once I have collated the info from their answers I'll post again here.Pushbutton (talk) 22:30, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And another one although slightly more ambiguous, but close to the actual time period: [2] The list of places it gives includes the sites of Butlin's funfairs, so Butlin was based in Dovercourt but whether it was as a camp or fair is less clear - should point out this book is written by George Orwell. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well I didn't get as many responses as I expected to the emails I sent out about this, maybe partly because it's Christmas and people are thinking about that rather than updating wikipedia Butlin's articles like me! However from the responses I did get from some former Butlin's managers they seemed as surprised as me to hear of the connection between Butlin's and Dovercourt, but when I pointed them to the evidence you have listed, they couldn't help but agree that it looks conclusive and indeed Dovercourt must have been built by and operated by Butlin's very briefly. As I said it would explain why the chalets at Dovercourt that were shown on "Hi de Hi" were identical to Butlin's ones. I wonder how many other camps Butlin's was involved in that we maybe still haven't discovered? I'll leave it to you to update the article accordingly.Pushbutton (talk) 07:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please consider self reverting your changes and gaining consensus on the talk page. Butlins Website uses the term "Skegness Resort" regularly and prominently. Further their web master has attempted to rename the article and mentions to the Resort name. So claiming that it is not officially called that is not supported by the sources (which you have incidentally removed) Further, please note that where you deleted a note that it was formally known by the apostrophied name claiming that it is wrong to say it was formally known by the unapostrophied name (which would be right if that was the claim you removed.) I'm mobile just now, and it's not easy for me to revert these edits but I will do it at the first opportunity until these changes are discussed. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 12:05, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Centro Properties Group, you may be blocked from editing. Arctic Kangaroo 14:28, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arndale Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Pushbutton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pushbutton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pushbutton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]