User talk:Quantumdots-X

February 2020[edit]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Manu Prakash. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. You need to read the WP:Manual of Style, including MOS:SECTIONHEAD, WP:REFPUNC, & MOS:CAPS. David Biddulph (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Suhail Chinya Salimpasha has been accepted[edit]

Mohammed Suhail Chinya Salimpasha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KartikeyaS343 (talk) 06:43, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quantumdots-X (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, I believe the block enforced is wrong. The article tagged for deletion violates the obvious procedure of obtaining Phd and Other Degrees in "India" quantumdots-x (talk) 03:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Nick-D (talk) 01:14, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What's going on with Verifyitsme (talk · contribs)? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 29300[edit]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Quantumdots-X (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #29300 was submitted on 2020-03-05 04:59:00. This review is now closed.

--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 09:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quantumdots-X (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that placing the deletion request was a hasty decision and Accept my mistake; Further on I will work according to the guidelines quantumdots-x (talk) 03:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to explain your connection to Verifyitsme (talk · contribs). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quantumdots-X (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that placing the deletion request was a hasty decision and Accept my mistake; Further on I will work according to the guidelines.

Verifyitsme (talk · contribs) is a schoolmate of mine who logged in the same device when my account was banned from further edits.

We run a fact check group :)

 quantumdots-x (talk) 10:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So after you got blocked, "your schoolmate" logged in on the same device to make a single edit to an article that you had previously been the primary contributor to? That's meatpuppetry even if it's true, and there is good reason to doubt it. Huon (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Uses of technology[edit]

Hello, Quantumdots-X. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Uses of technology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:13, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]