User talk:Qubacubazamniauser

April 2024[edit]

Hi Qubacubazamniauser! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank u I tried my best but thing I’m not trying do vandalism I’m trying to make simple edits page is missing Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 05:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sarah, Duchess of York. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

U aldready made lose edit privileges I asked fix something but u did not Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omega nugget (April 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Omega nugget and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qubacubazamniauser! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omega nugget (April 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Asilvering was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

asilvering (talk) 05:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Princess Alexandra of Hohenlohe-Langenburg[edit]

The article Princess Alexandra of Hohenlohe-Langenburg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Tindall[edit]

I have returned this to a redirect to her mother's article. Mia is a 10-year-old child who is not notable in her own right; notability is not inherited. The fact that she has been seen publicly in what anyone can recognize as a family situation (e.g., her great-grandparents' funerals) does not make her notable. Please do not create biographical articles of non-notable minor children of notable parents. Risker (talk) 06:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IT LOOKS LIKE I WAIT 20 WHOLE OTHER YEARS Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 08:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe longer. At this point, this child is the daughter of notable parents whose notability comes from their excellence in their chosen profession. The fact that her extended maternal family has a lot of very notable people is in no way a guarantee that she herself will become notable during her life. Risker (talk) 16:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WELL I CANT CREATE ANY ARCILE ALL THEM HARD FIND INFO I KNOW LOVE WIKEPDIA U LEADERS DRIVE ME CRAZY Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 01:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]