User talk:QueensEnglish

License tagging for Image:Mark Bacino Headshot.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mark Bacino Headshot.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Mb pic.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mb pic.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DreamCrush Music[edit]

A tag has been placed on DreamCrush Music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cynof Gavuf 09:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Mark Bacino has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Netalarmpoke 04:39, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note that "Pop Job: The Long Player" appears to be the correct name of the album, but the second part may have been mistaken for a comment. —Soap— 21:53, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Mark Bacino himself?[edit]

It is not forbidden, by any means, to edit an article about yourself ... lots of people do it ... but if you are Mark Bacino it is recommended that you tell us that, either on your userpage or right here, so that other editors can understand where you're getting your information from. You may also want to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. —Soap— 21:51, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think that Netalarm up above may have been objecting to your inserting information that isn't referenced to a third-party source (e.g. not yourself). I encourage you to follow that guideline, and it may help also to use edit summaries for each of your edits so it is clear to others what you are doing. —Soap— 21:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

STOP REMOVING AfD AND SPEEDY DELETION TAGS[edit]

Please refrain from removing these tags from articles. You have removed two tags (one Afd and one G-12 from John Zwerenz. This can be construed as serious misconduct. -Ad Orientem (talk) 06:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with John Zwerenz. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. czar · · 06:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with John Zwerenz. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. czar · · 06:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at John Zwerenz, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 07:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, QueensEnglish. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest warning[edit]

Hello, QueensEnglish. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Mark Bacino or other pages, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 10:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]