User talk:R.K. Elliott

Welcome[edit]

Hello R.K. Elliott and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Getting Started First steps • FAQ • Article creation wizard Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Teahouse • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 02:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your question at the Help desk[edit]

	Hello R.K. Elliott. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved\|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 22:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

Talkback[edit]

Hello, R.K. Elliott. You have new messages at Ukexpat's talk page.
Message added 23:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ukexpat (talk) 23:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Book desert (March 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

The references do not appear to indicate the notability of the concept of book deserts. Please provide references that explain the notability of the concept of book deserts, possibly in connection with how they should be addressed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Book desert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! R.K. Elliott, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Book desert (May 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysquirrel was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Interesting concept, but as the submission mentions, this is a recent idea. Wikipedia should only have articles about topics that have been discussed in reliable third party sources. Unfortunately, the provided sources do not mention book deserts by name, and since they are not included as inline references (with <ref></ref> tags), it is hard to tell how they support the information in the submission, and thus how they are relevant to the topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Book desert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Happy Squirrel (talk) 02:08, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Book desert (August 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

At this point this term is a neologism to describe this concept. It's an interesting one and honestly, the topic as a whole is long overdue for discussion, however I don't know where the topic and term are notable enough for an article at this point in time. Some of the given sources don't actually use the term "book desert" and ones like this one by the ALA don't specifically discuss the idea in the article. This brings up concerns of this being original research. We can't have OR in articles, let alone have an article based primarily on OR. I personally agree with every single thing you've written here, it's just that there isn't enough in the article that is specifically about book deserts.

Now something else to be careful about is the sourcing. Things like about us pages should not be used as a source to establish notability because in this case it's considered to be a bit of a WP:PRIMARY source since it's an advocacy group writing about what they do. What you specifically need here are things like news articles and academic works about this concept. You have this here, but not enough of them to firmly assert notability - and it can sometimes take a lot to really back up a new idea because you need to establish how this concept/term is independently notable outside of literacy as a whole. To add a new, "fun" level of difficulty in this, you need to show where more than 1-3 people and/or groups have written about this topic.

I'm going to see what I can do here, if there's anything I can add or help out with to maybe help establish independent notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Book desert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:52, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Book desert has been accepted[edit]

Book desert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Rebb ing 09:45, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]