User talk:RIP B1058

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, RIP B1058, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 04:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks RIP B1058 (talk) 17:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cygnus NG-21 has been accepted[edit]

Cygnus NG-21, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UtherSRG (talk) 14:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@UtherSRG Please have a look on Draft:Progress MS-26 and tell should it be ready for mainspace or not. If ready, please do it. —RIP B1058 (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please approve Draft:VIP Bazar metro station when you are free.@UtherSRG ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 11:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I only occasionally dip into AFC reviewing. You are better off waiting for the regular review non-queue. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No actually the queue is 2 minths long for reviewing, "This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,032 pending submissions waiting for review." ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 17:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So i asked separately ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 17:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It used to be four months long. You're getting closer! Joking aside, I'm sorry that you want to rush ahead, but Wikipedia has no deadline. Please be more patient. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK holding my patience. ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 18:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please edit your signature[edit]

Your signature is so big and distracting that it messes up the ability to read pages. Please remove the yellow "fog" around the lettering and remove the icons. It makes page reading really annoying. Ergzay (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1)I saw you as the first person to call my signature distracting.
2)I have followed rules for signatures as listed WP:SIGIMAGE.
3) Lots of signatures exist and that too of prolific editors, find them on Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#RfC:_disallowing_new_signatures_obsolete_tags. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 13:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mixed all ideas into one and used only one icon of RIP or tombstone. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 13:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
More info on my signature at #Your signature —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 13:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're following WP:SIGIMAGE but not WP:SIGLENGTH. The wikimarkup of your signature, not including the timestamp is 276 characters. Especially you should be making sure that your signature does not "give undue prominence to a given user's contribution". Your signature is trying to make you stand out too much. If you really want to keep it do know that people will look at you badly for it as you're effectively shouting "Look at me!". Ergzay (talk) 13:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also not a single person has a signature as obnoxious on the page you linked. I've been on Wikipedia for close to 20 years and I've never seen a signature as obnoxious as yours. Ergzay (talk) 13:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1)I am taking in a calm and composed manner, not shouting
2)WP:SIGLENGTH, I didn't knew
rest after chapter in signature —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 13:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also WP:SIGAPP: "Your signature must not blink, scroll, or otherwise cause inconvenience to or annoy other editors." (Bolding mine) Ergzay (talk) 13:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for adding on to this, but I feel the same way. Whenever you reply multiple times on a thread, it becomes really annoying to follow the entire conversation. I didn't want to tell you this earlier because I thought it was just me. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One more thing item I saw. You're using {{transform-rotate|180}} template in your signature, which is a violation of WP:SIG#NoTemplates for all the reasons listed there (apparently it breaks talk page archiving). Ergzay (talk) 14:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since these unanswered thoughts, suggestions and answers clog up, while I am changing preferences and researching for suitable alternatives:
1) most signatures if violate the signatures length is trimmed and preferences themselves have this markup length and we are automatically bound to follow them.
2) I never want to stand out, I just idolize martyred booster B1058 and I follow the self imposed rule, "First edit, then describe yourself (my user page)." If my signatures is bad, my recent user page edit was worst. But it was made for praying of B1061. Thus signature had similar motive.
3)no signature is obnoxious as i said grabbed other's ideas and amalgamated it to make my signature. I got fog or in more clear terms "text shadow" from,one of those users. Yes it's text shadow not fog.
3)NASAlization font is not available on wikipedia, I tried a 1000 times to implement it but failed and i want worm logo in my signature at any cost. Black worm logo exists as of rocket lab electron so no problem in changing. But I need a substitute of rotate by font or by span style allowed template and i am still searching it. —🪦VSVNB1058 (TALK) 15:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ergzay how's it followed a style from User relativity (don't want to tag him see at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#RfC:_disallowing_new_signatures_obsolete_tags) ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 16:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a lot better, though it's still very "loud". Also your link is broken. Ergzay (talk) 16:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will wok and decrease more ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 16:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean if you really want it you can keep it that way. You just need to realize how you're seen with that. It makes you really obvious. Ergzay (talk) 16:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bro just tell which link is broken i can open both user and talk page links from signature. ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 16:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1) As the documentation says, they're only trimmed if you don't use templates, which you were.
2) Having a large bright yellow signature (or bright yellow fog) makes you stand out. But having a loud busy user page is completely fine. User pages are supposed to be as colorful and wild as you like. I've seen some really crazy ones.
3) I've seen text shadow on people's signatures before, but it was more subtle rather than being very bright and standing out.
4) You can invert the text without using a template, if you have space for it using CSS, but you're not "NASA B1058" you're "RIP B1058", but anyway that's just a minor nitpick. Ergzay (talk) 16:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am RIP B1058 i tried to add nasa in my idbut looks like changing username isnt allowed. RIP is denoted by tombstone. I am searching a lighter shade of yellow ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 16:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I got lambda symbol as match and used instead of rotating ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 16:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks nicer, btw, just so you know, you can set any colors you want by just specifying the color hexcode like #1C8D6A. Ergzay (talk) 20:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ya but I chose to have any from yellow shade only as yellow/gold will signify to signify the martyred booster, this color is used by royals, fighters,etc. so used yellow ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 12:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RIP B1058 I'd suggest adding some & nbsp; (remove the space) or use <span class="nowrap"> into your signature to prevent it from being broken in half in line breaks which makes it look strange when it wraps the page. Ergzay (talk) 12:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 12:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and understand WP:NOTSTATS[edit]

I was just glancing at your edit history and a tremendous number of your edits is just adding random statistics to spaceflight pages. Please understand the WP:NOTSTATS section and also WP:TRIVIA. You seem to really like adding lots of these types of things to articles and updating them but that's not really the purpose of Wikipedia. You need to make sure anything you add is actually important and notable. Ergzay (talk) 16:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I remember I just forgot to add ref to my recent addition to List of spaceflight records are there more please show@Ergzay ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 01:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Point out the pages i will correct, sometimes ones pov is perceived differently by others, i mean where say i thought i have refs in handy but not provided, its important as per others to add refs. ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 01:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regularly updated is astronaut lists, spacecraft lists, a non-others updated booster timeline graph, a second stage configurations graph, Expedition pages. Rest i dont remember ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 01:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These are articles where the new elements found are just added, most cases where every element on page has citations i add citations ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 02:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Soyuz MS-24
added a link pointing to Belarusian
Spaceflight participant
added a link pointing to Belarusian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert[edit]

@Ergzay hi you reverted my removal. Actually the reason is that template doesnt work for terminus and interchange stations so i needed to remove it. no one uses and i need the colouring of infobox header as blue, green, etc. So i am addig it to all metro stations and manualling writing like "Kolkata metro interchange". Pleaee undo your revert as i dont want two-revert rule template edit ban. ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 10:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RIP B1058 Don't discuss this type of thing on people's talk pages. Discuss it over on the talk page of the article. I had already started a discussion and pinged you. Ergzay (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding train station wiki pages[edit]

One note, you should check out WP:NTRAINSTATION.

Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline.

Every single station shouldn't be needing to have it's own page on wikipedia unless it's notable in some way, and importantly there's reliable sources that can be quoted regarding the station. Not saying you're violating this, but just something to watch out for. Ergzay (talk) 12:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt knew this but i want an article for every Kolkata metro thats why i keep them in drafts as current one Draft:VIP Bazar metro station, whenever I am free and the time is non spaceflight I simply add what is collected during the intervals and when I think it's ok I submit it for review and get it into draftspace. I tale enough time to make these pages. Worth noting is another notability guideline of trains, not to focus on primary sources too much like metro operator website and that article cited focus on station instead of line. ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 12:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copying requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Smart Lander for Investigating Moon into Exploration of the Moon. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. This isn't the first time you've been warned about copying material without attribution. -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually i didn't because the whole paragraph was written by me, sorry i forgot to do the add missing citations and attribution ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 16:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need AFC Approval for mainspace[edit]

@Qcne nice to meet you, please approve this or atleast review whenever you are free ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 19:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i forgot to show the article is Draft:VIP Bazar metro station @Qcne ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 02:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VIP Bazar metro station has been accepted[edit]

VIP Bazar metro station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 02:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ritwik Ghatak metro station has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ritwik Ghatak metro station. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:53, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bro i have used those things in the article while making, ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 06:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon I have left afc comment on this issue, please review and understand future recreation was allowed by @Alalch E. back then, just merge history. ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 06:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2 more drafts are Draft:Barun Sengupta metro station and Draft:Beleghata metro station are made but I will work on them in near future once their status will be a bit clear of inauguration (I mean if are they opening in 1-2 months or not as per media reports (use translators). Some work is left on Beleghata like safety limit and an FOB, so i am just chillaxing (relaxing) before making those two) and i get some images on Wikimedia Commons of completed stations to add.
The point to notify the drafts is o show I am inheriting on the data available when they were actually an article. ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 07:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Esplanade, Kolkata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howrah Maidan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

Hi there, has this been announced anywhere? I have heard differently, but haven't seen anything published either way. Daniel (talk) 11:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel this is the homepage Stadium of al ahed ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 13:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It hasn't been finalised that the match will be played there, nor has it been publicly announced. Once the stadium is announced in a reliable source (and I expect it won't be in Iraq), we can then add it. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 13:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thats their home stadium na?@Daniel ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 14:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, it isn't. Their home stadium is in Lebanon. However, due to the political situation in Lebanon, AFC Cup teams cannot travel to play home games there. They have used Oman and Iraq as home stadiums during the knockout phase. However, Australians are banned from travelling to Iraq, so it is highly unlikely the match will be played there. The AFC Cup website still lists the location of the final as "TBC", and until they update it, we shouldn't speculate where the Final will be played. Daniel (talk) 20:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel oh extremely sorry mate I didn't knew this thanks for explain ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 06:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Daniel https://olympics.com/en/news/afc-cup-2023-24-football-cc-mariners-vs-abdysh-inter-zone-finals-leg-2-result says karbala stadium ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 09:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Still hasn't been announced by AFC. I suspect the staff writer for that website used the information on Wikipedia as a source. Daniel (talk) 12:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 13:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RIP_B1058&oldid=1220710355"