User talk:RKT7789

Welcome!

Hello, RKT7789, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:11, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello RKT7789, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Atomwaffen Division have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:24, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Note

Hi RKT7789. I watch the Atomwaffen Division article and have taken note of the brewing edit war there. I have warned the other involved editor about WP:BRD and WP:3RR, but for the purposes of fairness should also note that, should the edit war continue, please do not revert again (out of respect of 3RR) and instead use Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thanks. SamHolt6 (talk) 19:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

I’m aware of the rule, all’s good.RKT7789 (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Nazism and Capitalism and the AtomWaffen Division

Hi there, I just wanted to question your reasoning why you assert AtomWaffen to be Anti-Capitalist, when they are Neo-Nazis, and Nazism as an ideology is Capitalist.

While yes they may claim to be Anti-Capitalist, in practise this is only some Populistic attempt to garner support from those whom are anti-Capitalist.

As I have stated before, it is indeed quite evident that Nazi Germany was a Capitalist State, being that the Means of Production were owned Privately. To negate this and say that the Ideology of AtomWaffen is not in Support of Capitalism in my opinion is very misguided when we know from History Nazism is Capitalist. I will also review your citations and criticise them. Comrade Owain McAllister (talk) 01:02, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Some Marxists consider USSR to have been state capitalist, but we report it as a socialist state because that’s how it identified, true or false. Same thing here. AWD thinks of itself as anti-capitalist and there are valid sources that report it as such, so it goes in the ideology section. Also, Atomwaffen might be many things but populist is not one of them, they cheer Kim Jong Un, Satanism, Osama bin Laden and Charles Manson. Also all citations are from material to people who already are members so it makes even less sense: James Mason quote was from Siege which members have to read, Corwyn Carver was talking to another member in a (leaked) private chat, and ADL was quoting some communique to the members as well. Nazis were capitalist, full stop. But AWD is more like a cult with features of a nazi party. If they genuinely, honest to God believe they are anti capitalist instead of it being a cynical ploy, it wouldn’t even be the weirdest thing. They’re a contradiction. Nazis that admire terrorists of color and North Korea, don’t believe in leadership principle, hate Christians and instead love Islam and satanism, and actually want to attack state apparatus instead of supporting it. That’a actually what I find so fascinating. I mean, these people are sick, vile human beings, but from a research viewpoint.

RKT7789 (talk) 06:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

@Comrade Owain McAllister: And look, you’re a good guy, and not to be a dick, but just in the case you don't know how Wikipedia works. I’m just gonna save you the effort and tell you that quoting M-L theory and marxism.org won’t be considered valid reason for removing sourced material. In Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it...Questionable sources are those that have a poor reputation for checking the facts, lack meaningful editorial oversight, or have an apparent conflict of interest. Such sources include websites and publications expressing views that are widely considered by other sources to be extremist or promotional. But also thanks for talking it to the talk page instead of starting an edit war, I appreciate it.RKT7789 (talk) 07:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Do you seriously think you can justify hyperbole and false statements with face value identification? Is everything just what people call it? Because I don't remember wikipedia calling the DPRK democratic, even tho the name says it is Mononononoke (talk) 07:12, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domestic terrorism in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atomwaffen Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiegel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your work on neonazi articles

I noticed how well written the Atomwaffen Division article is, and I just wanted to say I really appreciate it. Clear, neutral documentation of far-right groups and activities is a good way to expose their actions. A good understanding of these groups is vital for countering their actions. Keep up the good work. Киан (talk) 20:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

I agree completely, that's precisely why I'm here. And thanks, that means a lot to me.RKT7789 (talk) 22:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Order of Nine Angles

I had to close the DRN request for lack of a response. I think your concerns and conclusions are well taken. I will be checking on the article occasionally. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for giving it a shot! Appreciate it. RKT7789 (talk) 00:44, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

debate corner

actually see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Emeraude#what_do_you_mean_%22no_rationale%22%3F%3F%21%21%21_i_just_quoted_james_mason_book_Siege_ie_atomwaffen%27s_mein_kampf ok do you have any secondary sources for "ONA Satanism (factions)" in Atomwaffen Division, meybe we should just delete all the ideologies without a secondary source? Gooduserdude (talk) 12:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

@Gooduserdude: All of them, per wikipedia policy. AWD never itself admitted to being ONA affiliated, it's based on research done on the group by CWE experts and journalists. Don't take it personally, revert wasn't some personal attack towards you.RKT7789 (talk) 12:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

you know what REALLY clutters the infobox?, things like

• Futurism
• Homophobia
• Neo-fascism
• White supremacism
• White nationalism

is not included in Neo-Nazism anyway? Gooduserdude (talk) 12:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

They are, Futurism not necessarily. I personally feel they're a bit redundant but I defer to the consensus of having them. RKT7789 (talk) 12:14, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

"consensus"? there was no talkpage discussion about it, some people just added it and no one removed if you call that consensus (which it is, that is consensus) lets create a new consensus, let just remove all the clutter then Gooduserdude (talk) 12:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

@Gooduserdude: If you genuinely feel strongly about that, you can ask User:Emeraude's opinion on that and I'll be sure to give my input.RKT7789 (talk) 12:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

why do you quote Siege if you only care about secondary sources? i really want know! why? Gooduserdude (talk) 12:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

@Gooduserdude: Take it easy my dude. Where have I quoted Siege directly in article references? There's one instance of ProPublica quoting Siege off the top of my head, but that is secondary source providing their analysis on that bit and not a direct quotation from a primary source, being Siege, and in addition to that it's one of multiple references for the one thing. And if you could keep this discussion in one user page and in one section that would be cool. Thanks.RKT7789 (talk) 12:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

why should i ask his opinion? if he disagress he is free to revert, now what am asking is, can i go ahead and make the desired changes without YOU reverting? thanks Gooduserdude (talk) 12:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Didn't you just say "lets create a new consensus"? That would by definition require User:Emeraude's opinion. I do not wish to offend you, and take this in the friendly, constructive manner it is intended. Is English your first language? Are we using terms that are unclear to you? I'm not first language speaker either and I would be happy to explain some complex concepts that seem to cause unnecessary friction here. RKT7789 (talk) 12:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

i never said he's opinion did not matter(trust me it does), but right now am not asking him, i ask you first! and my first language is swedish btw Gooduserdude (talk) 12:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

@Gooduserdude:I'm not entirely sure at this point what you wish to add or remove, but you don't need my permission, just follow the basic wikipedia policy on sources as it is written in Wikipedia:SECONDARY and you won't get reverted.RKT7789 (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

also i understand english 100% but writing english 60-70% (am no good in grammar) Gooduserdude (talk) 12:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

yes i will keep future discussion there, but just one last thing here, am sorry i tried to attempt something and it did not work, i would actually be really SAD IF ANY single ideology would be removed SO KEEP EVERTHING so thank you and good day Gooduserdude (talk) 07:21, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

btw can you please change this header to something more neutral, "Friendly debate corner" can imply irony and in turn unfriendliness, thanks Gooduserdude (talk) 07:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

This user doesn't know what accelerationism is

And will rely on yellow press definitions slandering theories. Please research u/acc, the CCRU and Mark Fisher if you think Accelerationism is a political doctrine (or related to any human action at all). Words may change but Misnomers exist. In academia true acc still exists, people writing about time theories related to the philosophies of Gilles Deleuze and Lyotard's libidinalism have nothing to do with vulgar politics. Please do your research before attempting to contribute to a public project. Mononononoke (talk) 08:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

@Mononononoke: Original research isn't welcome in Wikipedia, Wikipedia:ORIGINAL. This seems to be the most misunderstood policy. We base the content on secondary sources, or yellow press as you put it. Wikipedia:SECONDARY. RKT7789 (talk) 08:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

It takes about 2 minutes to find secondary literature on actual accelerationism, like the book #Accelerate published by Robin Mackay, or publications on left wing accelerationism by Making University, or even YouTube videos like "A Quick Rundown on Accelerationism", which seem to be sufficient for wikipedia "research" Mononononoke (talk) 09:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Missing cite in Nordic Resistance Movement

The article cites "Senholt 2013" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 07:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Of course, thanks so much for pointing it out, I've been poring through so many sources it completely slipped my mind!RKT7789 (talk) 09:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Nordic Resistance Movement

i found this Organizational structure of the Nordic Resistance Movement from the swedish wikipedia but its in swedish, and i added it and later removed(because it in swedish but should be in english for this article)to the article but i dont know how to make a english version jpg

can you please fix my errors on that page and expand the new sections, thanks Gooduserdude (talk) 09:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Aight I'll take a look after IRL responsibilities.RKT7789 (talk) 09:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

can you please translate the swedish Organizational structure infobox? can you swedish? otherwise try google translate, i dont know how to make a english version jpg Gooduserdude (talk) 12:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Only Polish, English and a bit of Belarusian I'm afraid. Why don't you ask someone from Swedish wiki to translate it, Google Translate results are usually pretty atrocious.RKT7789 (talk) 13:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

National Democratic Party of Germany#Junge Nationalisten

why is it included as Junge Nationalisten and not National Democratic Party of Germany (factions), i mean in that case we should use Finns Party Youth instead of Finns Party (factions), its not like there are factions in that party that are allies, its more Finns Party Youth connections Gooduserdude (talk) 07:47, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

@Gooduserdude: Actually its a pretty complicated case, its precisely the latter case. Finns party originated from the ruins of the Finnish agrarian party, and the original faction are pretty much your run of the mill right wing conservatives, but the party was taken over by the ethnonationalist faction led by Jussi Halla-aho and Suomen Sisu. Actually the guy who got beaten with clawhammer was a moderate Finn Party member opposed to the hardline faction. The Finns Party Youth mainly aligns with the dominant ethnonationalist faction.

Junge Nationalisten acts more independently, for example, they are pro-Ukraine while NPD itself is pro-Russia. But they're still aligned so I guess linking to the article is fine. Its a bit different situation, since there are two different but aligned organizations with differing views, while with the Finns Party the factions struggle inside the main party itself. Politics sure is complicated, huh? RKT7789 (talk) 07:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

ok with that taken care of, should Junge Nationalisten be included? are they allies or mere connections? Gooduserdude (talk) 07:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

I have no strong feelings about this. You could categorize them as either one. They took part in the Finnish independence day demonstration organized by FRM I'm writing about currently and will publish soon.RKT7789 (talk) 08:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

i went ahead and restored the your original version, as it is confusing for the readers (as there is no Junge Nationalisten article itself) Gooduserdude (talk) 08:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

The NPD article mentions them in the infobox, but fine by me, it might be confusing. Published the march section.RKT7789 (talk) 08:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

wait, FRM was banned by finnish government(in which the finns party participated), some loyal ally right? or what was the finns party official position on the ban? Gooduserdude (talk) 08:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

During the Sipilä Cabinet and ban, Finns were led by Timo Soini, and when he was ousted by Jussi Halla-aho and his faction, the MPs of the moderate-agrarian faction split into Blue Reform while the Finns went into opposition. Complicated business as I said.RKT7789 (talk) 08:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

now that i added this section to the npd article, can you please correct grammar typos, and expand that section with information about their nmr allies Gooduserdude (talk) 08:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Done.RKT7789 (talk) 11:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

btw, you seem to be an expert on nazism, what is your university degree? just curious, thanks, also is it in Political science? Gooduserdude (talk) 12:37, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

None, I just write these articles and hope that perhaps someone benefits from them. Strong believer in "sunlight is the best disinfectant". I concentrate on accelerationist groups as they're the least understood but most dangerous. When I became aware of Atomwaffen years ago, I instantly knew we'd hear more from them. Regrettably time has proven me right.RKT7789 (talk) 12:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

"Regrettably time has proven me right." eh? modified qoute from Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984 film):

"“If you want a vision of the future RKT7789, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever.”, Oceania ruled by the National Socialist Order, Eurasia ruled by the National Bolshevik Party and East Asia ruled by the Chinese Communist Party

Gooduserdude (talk) 08:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

that last part was a joke, sorry Gooduserdude (talk) 12:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Nordic Strength

meybe you can start a new article about Nordic Strength ie Nordic Resistance Movement#Nordic Strength thanks Gooduserdude (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

There isn't really all that much info about them, I think it works best as part of NRM until there's more. I prefer that to stubs.RKT7789 (talk) 12:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Far-right allies?

You've made numerous edits to pages surrounding far-right political parties and organizations, claiming many groups are somehow "allies". Please provide citations for these claims before connecting random groups together, simply because they have similar political ideologies. Preferably, primary sources from the organizations themselves, or clarifying that the "alliances" are de facto. 2603:8090:640:1590:B1F9:62B9:7D4:513D (talk) 08:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure you have read the articles, all the "allies" are explained within the articles. And actually wikipedia prefers secondary sources, not what organisations say about themselves but analysis by academic sources. But for good measure I have included both. Only unsourced claim I could find after having a closer look is Great Russia-RIM connection, but it is from a linked article and I shall include it in the body of the article ASAP. For wikipedia policy, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a tertiary source. Anyway, thanks for bringing my attention to that one link, but it wouldn't have necessitated removing blocks of multiple articles. Source doesn't necessarily have to be in Infobox, as long as it is in the article to avoid clutter. If you have questions about some particular thing, I'm happy to answer.RKT7789 (talk) 09:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

My apologies, I removed only specific organizations not cited in the infobox or article (such as CasaPound) in a new edit and gave explanations for other removals. I made an account to avoid confusion due to my dynamic IP. Disoriented1 (talk) 11:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

@Disoriented1:You obviously didn't go through the sources. Fredik Vejdeland was speaking in Der Dritte Weg demonstration like week ago. Their cooperation with Casapound too is mentioned in multiple sources, just picking one for example. Finnish NRM even recently visited James Mason and the article cites them promoting Siege and Atomwaffen. And RIM, their leader even visited NRM Nordic Days event. Just what are you doing, it's like you're removing them at random. FYI, your edits don't show up since you're not autoconfirmed so they can be removed without ever being published, so make a proper case for removal before you do anything.RKT7789 (talk) 11:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

None of the connections I removed were elaborated on in the article, or given as a citation in the infobox. Compare this to the article for the Aryan Brotherhood, where each affiliation is cited next to the affiliate. If the NRM visited James Mason, then explain that in the article as your basis for connecting NRM as allies to Atomwaffen, or cite NRM's visit in the infobox. None of the links you just provided to me are even in the article as citations. I'm not doubting that these groups are connected, but you have to explain why instead of assuming I'm going to read through every source in the article to verify the connection. Disoriented1 (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

@Disoriented1: Actually they don't necessarily have to be cited in the infobox, as long as they are cited. You see, you can tell from the infobox they are allied, if you are curious to know more beyond what is relevant to the article, you can read more from the cited source! Handy, isn't it? It is counterproductive delving into every alliance in the article in detail, as the focus should be the group the article is about. There's this policy that article should be about facts that are relevant to the topic of the article.WP:WEIGHT

That said, a line or two about visiting James Mason might be of interest to the readers, now that you mention it.RKT7789 (talk) 11:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Does WP:CHALLENGE not mean you have to make an inline citation when you're presenting a claim for the first time in an article? For instance, adding https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11288020 as an inline citation when claiming Casapound is an ally of NRM (the only time that is claimed in the article)? If not, my bad. Disoriented1 (talk) 12:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

@Disoriented1:The rule has been that it's not necessary to add citation to the infobox as long as the citation exists in the article, so it's not mandatory but if you feel it's helpful, then by all means add it. I just have aimed to keep citations in minimum in the infobox so it looks visually better. But I suppose it's a personal preference, and now that you bring it up I guess it might cause extra effort to the reader in certain cases. To be honest I don't have all that strong feelings about it and am open to suggestions.RKT7789 (talk) 12:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Far-right politics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WSOY.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Finns party "ethnonationalism" huh? i dont get it

what exact evidence is there that the finns party is not just a finnish version of the sweden democrats cultural nationalism? "ethnonationalism" in the finns party? huh? i dont get it, can you please provide to the contrary if you have some evidence? thanks Gooduserdude (talk) 10:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/finns_party_youth_reject_rule_change_after_fascist_scandal/11234754 this reminds me of sweden democrats did to the ethnonationalist faction of sd so they founded their own party Alternative for Sweden Gooduserdude (talk) 10:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

@Gooduserdude:Cooperating with NRM in cases too numerous to list here and being led by this dude with hate speech convictions would be pretty big red flags, as is ministers celebrating the SS. And the party in general defines Finnishness as something genetic, not acquired and that minorities are genetically predisposed to committing crime. They had to silence the youth wing because they said the silent part loud and openly identified as fascist. As in one event one True Finn Youth leader said that he is a fascist to great applause. Not that the main party fundamentally disagrees with that, they just handle it with a bit more tact.RKT7789 (talk) 11:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

ok, but why do they not have forced Remigration in their party program, what is the point of the ethnonationalist faction taking over the party that if they take over the country there will be no forced Remigration but merely voluntary Remigration, this again sounds like something like the Sweden Democrats please explain that part, thanks Gooduserdude (talk) 08:32, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

@Gooduserdude: There's no such thing as "peaceful ethnic cleansing". Even Richard Spencer supports "voluntary repatriation". What if they refuse to leave voluntarily? Then it becomes a regular ethnic cleansing. Just because a party doesn't outright say they wanna kill fucking many people, doesn't mean they don't. I don't think even NRM says outright they will sardine method all brown people although they definitely would. You have awful lot of trust in the honesty of fascists

also as much as I love putting fash on blast, Wikipedia is not a forum

RKT7789 (talk) 09:19, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

what makes you come to that conclusion? i was merely discussing whenever "ethnic nationalism" should be or not be included in the lede of the wikipedia article Finns Party, btw what does "I love putting fash on blast" mean in this in this context? Gooduserdude (talk) 13:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

It would fit there but generally it hasn't been included in similar cases because some feel its a term of abuse like "white nationalist" and causes bickering. In this context it means insulting fascists.RKT7789 (talk) 18:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Shandon Simpson

A telegram channel is not a "nexion" or terrorist group, this is equivalent to saying that following a twitter user makes you apart of a terrorist group, furthermore there is no evidence that Shandon knew what o9a was or even believed in it. Without direct quotations from the article there is not even proof that Shandon was apart of this telegram channel either. None of the sources cited for the section you added on Shandon say anything to do with him being apart of o9a group or nexion with the other person who plotted a terrorist attack. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quutamo123 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Your recent editing history at Order of Nine Angles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nthep (talk) 17:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Far-right politics

Hey, thanks for your work on the Finnish far-right. Friendly request, could you leave edit summaries for larger edits? don't mind if you don't for minor typos etc...just makes it easier to review other erditors contributions, of which yours have all been very helpful and constructive. Thanks again. Bacondrum (talk) 01:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Of course, my bad, thanks for the heads up!RKT7789 (talk) 06:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

• Hi again, thanks for your contribution regarding Estonia, all really good work. Can I ask you again to include edit summaries? Just makes it easier to review additions and is generally considered best practice. Here's the relevant help page Help:Edit summary. Terviseks! Bacondrum (talk) 21:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry, totally forgot right away, my bad, I swear I'll shape up from now on. Thanks for putting up with my absent minded ass.RKT7789 (talk) 05:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

No worries at all, sorry to badger you about it. Cheers!

atomwaffen "white ethnostate" label

the SPLC is not a reliable source, i mean the infobox should show atomwaffen OWN! motives not the ones SPLC assigned them, "wanna white ethnostate" is just a general label they automatically give such groups just like "far-right" or "neo-nazi" if you read siege, you find out they have very little to do with hitler and more with the anarchist satanists like manson and mason etc, so can you please provide further evidence that THEY THEMSEMSLEVES! want a state, because in reality they DONT want a white ethnostate, they want something out of their satanist fantasy book "iron gates" Gooduserdude (talk) 08:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

@Gooduserdude: I don't have to, because contrary to your claims, SPLC is recognized as a reliable source. In fact, as a secondary source, SPLC is even more reliable than a primary source, like an Atomwaffen website. WP:PSTS. Take it easy. RKT7789 (talk) 08:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

it does not have to be from atowaffen website, i just want objective proof they want a "state", i mean how could (satanist) anarchists want a state? does that not contradict itself? Gooduserdude (talk) 08:34, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

@Gooduserdude:One could argue claiming they're anarchist nazis is a contradiction in itself. Atomwaffen has identified as "National Socialist" countless of times but I don't know they would have ever identified as anarchist. And don't conflate Atomwaffen using "anarchy" with anarchism. Anarchy, in this context, is a limited period of lack of government following a state-collapse, anarchism is trying to permanently abolish all hierarchies.RKT7789 (talk) 08:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

ok, maybe i am mistaken about the subject, i read siege and got the impression that their future state structure reminds me of a anarchist commune, they obviously don't believe in leadership principle or a central state structure Gooduserdude (talk) 09:05, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

@Gooduserdude:It is true that James Mason doesn't talk much about the shape of the future state in Siege, for him, its a foregone conclusion that all readers want a nazi state. The book is targeted at people who already are hardcore nazis, and aims to convince them of the need for armed combat and terrorism, that's why it keeps hammering home the need for "chaos and anarchy". I can see how this might mislead a reader.RKT7789 (talk) 09:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

sweden democrats

can you please give me your opinion if it should link (in the ideology section)Swedes|Swedish nationalism or Sweden|Swedish nationalism, i changed to the later, since their not ethnic nationalist, i thought of this because you claimed there is no such thing such as voluntary remigration, does this mean jimme åkesson secretly plans to commit forced remigration (does that amount to ethnic cleansing as you claimed?) if he comes to power and sd moderation is just a tactic? Gooduserdude (talk) 08:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Not having delved into the subject, go with whatever your sources say.RKT7789 (talk) 14:40, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Far-right politics in Finland and Estonia

Hey RKT7789, thanks for all your great work at Far-right politics. I think your work on Finland and Estonia is excellent and it's getting to the size now where we might want to create a separate article. You clearly have a lot of knowledge on the subject. So do you want to create a new article? I was thinking about taking your work and using that as the basis for the new article, but seeing as you did all the work I thought you might enjoy doing that yourself. Then we could summerise at the far-right article and link to the more detailed article where you could continue to expand without consideration for the size restrictions imposed when expanding the existing Far-right politics article (which is quite large as is). Cheers Bacondrum (talk) 22:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

@Bacondrum:I'd be happy to do that. You trim the excess from the far-right article as you see fit, I'll work on the new article. I wouldn't have minded at all if you had created the article, but thanks for being considerate. Edit: Far-right politics in Finland, there we go, still some work to do, but now you have free hands with the far-right article. RKT7789 (talk) 07:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Brilliant, already a detailed and comprehensive article. Between the Nazis and the Soviets, it is such a gut wrenching period of history. That photo of murder in Tampere, it's too much to bare. I can't even imagine living through those times, utterly terrifying. Cheers. Bacondrum (talk) 21:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@Bacondrum: You said it, comrade. Personally I think it's very important to learn and write about lesser known fascist scenes and make them known, lest we forget.RKT7789 (talk) 03:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Absolutely, couldn't agree more. Bacondrum (talk) 04:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

@Bacondrum: You must have set off some warning bells somewhere with that comment because immediately some fash showed up trying to whitewash the Vaps in the Far-right article. I mean we got a picture of their members doing a nazi salute and in the text below you trying to insist they've got nothing to do with fascism. Artur Sirk even refused to touch money that had been touched by Jews. I mean come on, what are you doing dude. Some shameful shit. RKT7789 (talk) 13:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

That's pretty offensive to call me a "fash" and claim I was attempting to "whitewash the Vaps". While there is no doubt they were at the very least a populist radical-right group and were fascist-like with their Roman salute and black attire, there is certainly some debate in the literature as to whether they were in fact true fascists. --Nug (talk) 18:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

I agree it's pretty offensive to call anyone a fascist. Having said that, it does look like an attempt to whitewash the article. The sources in the article do describe them as fascist, RKT7789's work and related claims are really bloody solid. This is a laughable comment "were fascist-like with their Roman salute", think about how silly that sounds. That's like saying "they were fascist-like with their swastikas and sig runes". Bacondrum (talk) 21:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Clearly you haven't taken the time to read the sources on the topic, if you had you would know there was deep anti-German sentiment pre-WW2 and despite the view of Artur Sirk, the Vaps movement had in fact repudiated anti-antisemitism and racism, and had adamantly denied that they themselves were fascist, see pages 70-77 in The Radical Right in Interwar Estonia by A. Kasekamp. Sporting a Swastika doesn't necessarily indicate an adherence to Fascist ideology, as indicated by the continued use of the Finnish Airforce as seen here. --Nug (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

@Bacondrum and Nug:"Despite of their leader's antisemitism they had repudiated antisemitism." And I know how that is, I too sometimes wear a swastika. Completely apolitically, of course.RKT7789 (talk) 00:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Just for shits and giggles...haha Bacondrum (talk) 02:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yrjö Ruutu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WSOY.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Notice of discretionary sanctions

Your comment "You must have set off some warning bells somewhere with that comment because immediately some fash showed up trying to whitewash the Vaps in the Far-right article." is pretty offensive, and violates numerous Wikipedia policies and behavioural guildlines such as WP:CIV, WP:NPA and WP:AGF. You appear to be relatively new here, so you may not be aware that there is a discretionary sanction regime in place for topics related to Eastern Europe, for which the article Vaps_Movement would fall under. Therefore I have placed a formal notice on your talk page. Cheers, --Nug (talk) 18:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ruutu

Hi, about the Yrjö Ruutu party. I don't know if you understand Finnish, but here is my rough translation from the National Biography of Finland:

"A new party uniting nationalism and socialism was planned by Ruutu in 1925. The concept of ‘National Socialism’ was developed, which, despite its name, had nothing to do with Adolf Hitler. ... In 1932, at the middle of the economic recession, the "Ruutuites" founded the Finnish National Socialist Union."

You can find more information also on Finnish wikipedia: https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suomalaissosialistinen_puolue

Ruutu admired Strasserism and Kemalism, but to call his party "Nazi" is not correct. For example, Ruutu wasn't an anti-semite, supported democracy and international cooperation and rejected militaristic expansionism. After the war, he was a member of the communist Finnish People's Democratic League — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virtuus (talk • contribs) 17:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

@Virtuus: "However, Ruutu sympathized with the Nazi party's Strasser wing and was bitterly disappointed when the party, after rising to power in Germany in 1933, abandoned its socialist program." Seems like one of these statements has to be untrue. But well, I have no strong feeling if you revert my edit, "nationalist and socialists" is just a roundabout way of saying the same thing.RKT7789 (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

He admired Strasserism for its "third way" of combining socialism and nationalism, but rejected many other ideas of Nazism. For Ruutu, Nazi antisemitism was irrational, as German Jewish scientists and artists had brought so much national prestige for Germany.

It would be more accurate to describe his ideology as "right-wing social democracy" in the way of Eduard Bernstein. I'll try to find more sources and add material to the article. --Virtuus (talk) 17:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Erik Mättö for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erik Mättö is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Mättö until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 22:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Patriotic People's Party moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Patriotic People's Party, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Cool suggestion

This podcast was quite good. Almost certainly non-RS, since it is a podcast from a masters student, but interesting nonetheless and potentially useful in helping frame the skull-guy network. Might ask if the interview-ee's thesis is available somewhere. Jlevi (talk) 16:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC) (please use {{reply to|Jlevi}} on reply)

Glad you liked it! RKT7789 (talk) 17:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peasant March

The article Peasant March has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ratlines (World War II aftermath), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue-and-Black Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rauma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Ensio Uoti.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ensio Uoti.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Hjalmar Bonsdorff.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hjalmar Bonsdorff.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atomwaffen Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alsatian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Hi thanks for creating Jussi Leino which I’ve just reviewed. Is it based partly on the fi.wiki article? If so I need to add a template to the talk page. Thanks. Mccapra (talk) 14:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

@Mccapra: Thank you for the review. And yes it is!RKT7789 (talk) 14:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok great. You’ll see I’ve added a template into the talk page. Any time you base a new article on one from another wiki, you need to add that template so we preserve attribution for copyright purposes. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 15:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Suggestion For Subsection Re: ONA Article

May I make a suggestion? The subtopics of "4.2 In Montenegro" and "4.3 The Legion Ave Satan offshoot" feels out of place being under the topic of "4 Terrorism and Crime." Could we create a new subtopic under "3 Organization," called something to the effect of "3.3 Known Nexions & Associates" and then we can move all subentries about ONA nexions, offshoots, and known associates to that subtopic?" SeptaNiner (talk) 14:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your use of neo-Nazi websites

Hey RKT7789/Volcel Partisan, you say on your userpage that you don't like Nazis, but why are you then using the Neo-Nazi website Vastarinta.com as a source in Wikipedia? See this edit for example. Why are you breaking Wikipedia's sourcing policies and giving traffic to neo-Nazi websites? --Sankari (talk) 10:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

@Sankari: Primary source is acceptable in that case that yes, Vastarinta sold the magazine, besides its backed by secondary source by Combating Terrorism Center. Relax with the wikilawyering newbie.RKT7789 (talk) 10:42, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Ping

Hi, which part of dont ping me to that discussion, did you not understand? Where did I stop you from presenting your opinions? I don't want to mute people but you are not leaving me another option. Venkat TL (talk) 07:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Flag of SKS.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of SKS.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 16:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wagner Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kolovrat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Justice Party (United States)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on National Justice Party (United States) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from adl.org/resources/backgrounder/national-justice-party. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. interstatefive  17:22, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:National Justice Party.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:National Justice Party.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of National Justice Party (United States)

Hello, RKT7789

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Curbon7, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, National Justice Party (United States), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Curbon7}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Curbon7 (talk) 19:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of National Justice Party (United States) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Justice Party (United States) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Justice Party (United States) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QueenofBithynia (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

File:National Justice Party.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:National Justice Party.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Siniristi 1933.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Siniristi 1933.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 01:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brandon Russell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Dawn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

License tagging for File:JM Siege.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JM Siege.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Translating

Hi, I noticed you seem to have translated John Rosberg from the fiwiki original. Please note that translations require attribution, see WP:HOWTRANS. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:57, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing: I'm adding attribution to all my translated articles...even if a little late.RKT7789 (talk) 09:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Okay, cool. Ideally it should be added with the first edit, but better late than never.

I've added it to the Rosberg one (talk page). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Action (UK), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Neo-Nazism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I will do that.RKT7789 (talk) 01:47, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Nordic Resistance Movement (Allies)

why did you list golden dawn as a "former ally"? golden dawn still exists Gooduserdude (talk) 16:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

@Gooduserdude: Barking up the wrong tree here, I didn't add them. I have no knowledge of Golden Dawn one way or the other.RKT7789 (talk) 06:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

i mistook your edit with User:Haisollokopas, you added the allies list but User:Haisollokopas added golden dawn, i will ask him Gooduserdude (talk) 15:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Far-right politics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New Yorker and Golden Dawn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Waffen SS Foreign Volunteers

Thanks for trying to contribute to the page in the title. However, please do not cite random catalog pages for content, as this is unverifiable. Also, posting from Finnish or Polish website does not help the typical reader. While this is an international forum to be sure, you want to cite RS with pages numbers etc. instead of just providing a generic link to a catalog listing for a certain author. Thanks. Obenritter (talk) 18:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

@Obenritter: Thank you for your comment, I have subsequently improved the references. Hope they are fine now.RKT7789 (talk) 05:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

That's much better. If you would be so kind, can you convert them into SFN style so as to match the rest of the page? Thanks. --Obenritter (talk) 12:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Sure thing.RKT7789 (talk) 14:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Ajan Suunta 1939.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ajan Suunta 1939.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 21:16, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Karl Algot Jansson.png

The file File:Karl Algot Jansson.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

duplicate

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Category:Satanism and Nazism

A quick look at the Diaboli article’s history revealed that you added the category. A quick look at the discography showed that later releases do indeed have NS-related lyrics. Nevertheless, there is not a single word on the matter in the article itself. The same applies to quite a few more articles in the same category, some of which I have removed because they lack evidence or because they simply don’t belong there, full stop. I didn’t check if you added the category to all of them, but as you created it, it might be the case. If you add such a category, please make sure the article reflects that, meaning there should be at least a few words on the connection between Satanism (specify which branch: CoS, O9A, other) and Nazism in that specific case. --2003:F5:FF1C:E900:A556:9187:52D3:607B (talk) 15:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Flag of SKS.svg

The file File:Flag of SKS.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused svg with rendering problems, superseded by File:Flag of SKS.png.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:54, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Flag of SSTP.svg

The file File:Flag of SSTP.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused svg with rendering problems, superseded by File:Flag of SSTP.png.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:54, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Christian nationalism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

thank you !!!

Hi, I just wanted to thank you for your editing work here, especially by helping to expand the article on Christian nationalism with a broader, more international scope. It is very much appreciated! I also wanted to thank you for your recent additions to the Russian Imperial Movement page and the article about the Atomwaffen Division. Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 19:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, I Will try to keep it up!RKT7789 (talk) 04:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Awesome!! Yeah, English Wikipedia is too focused on the US. Expanding the content is so helpful and important, plus adds a lot of context that everyone should know more about! Thank you! :) Cheers. 98.155.8.5 (talk) 20:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:AryanFreedomNetwork.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AryanFreedomNetwork.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 06:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Brandon Clint Russell2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brandon Clint Russell2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 06:38, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Neo-Nazism into Waffen-SS. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:51, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ActiveClubNetwork.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ActiveClubNetwork.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Artturi Vuorimaa

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from nl.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 16:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Slipped my mind, thanks for the heads up!RKT7789 (talk) 16:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Order of Nine Angles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Mirror.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

James Manson category

Regarding the Manson Family category, I do not think James Mason applies here. He is not mentioned as a member of the family on the article itself (or at all for that matter) despite the fact that he might've known members. With this logic, people like Dennis Wilson should also be included in the category. What do you think is best? Is there any supplementary sources that might prove his association to the family more clearly which can be added into his article/the family's article? Thanks! digiulio8 (talk) 18:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

@Digiulio8: He is mentioned in Manson's article: Charles_Manson#Cultural_impact .RKT7789 (talk) 08:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Right, but even in that source the author distinguishes between the Family proper and James Manson. James was in Virginia and Ohio while the Family was committing murders and did not yet have any association with Charles Manson. His open praise of Manson begins years later in the '80s with the inception of "Siege" and the Universal Order, where he would be in contact with Charles Manson, 12 years after the Family had disbanded. digiulio8 (talk) 13:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Paavo Talvela

Hi! Inspired by this edit of yours, I went diving in my sources about Finnish far-right/fascists for missing specifics we should mention in the article for Paavo Talvela. Heimosodat and Lapua Movement are already briefly covered (but could do with some expanding), but beyond those the only concrete thing I found was a brief mention of him being in the background (fin. "taustalla") in founding Academic Karelia Society (Page 114 in "Suomalaiset fasistit" by Silvennoinen et al., 2016). Including this is a no-brainer, but I was wondering if you had any further tips on things that are missing? Ljleppan (talk) 11:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

@Ljleppan: Hi! That pretty much covers his political activism, but he was also pro-active in setting up the Finnish Waffen SS. RKT7789 (talk) 11:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll work on incorporating these into the prose. Ljleppan (talk) 11:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC)