User talk:Rachna1324

May 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to BTV has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: BTV was changed by Rachna1324 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937127 on 2014-05-22T09:47:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ResellerClub Logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ResellerClub Logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Asus ZenFone may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[http://www.btvin.com/videos/watch/8359/best-budget-smartphones- Best Budget Smartphones - BTvIn(Bloomberg TV India]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:43, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the the impression that those Bloomberg India citations were spam, judging by your editing history. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 13:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rachna1324 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not promoting or representing any company as such. It's just that I find Bloomberg News very informative but I guess I should have used news from across channel instead of just keeping to one channel. I love the world of Wikipedia and I don't want to offend the administrators or users and also I don't want to resort to any sort of advertisement or indulge in any activity which doesn't adhere to Wikipedia policies. I am sorry that you felt that I am indulging in some practices unacceptable by Wiki Community. If you could unblock my account I will be very grateful and also I will make sure to use other channels as references too.Rachna1324 (talk) 07:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

By attempting to evade your block using the sock puppet Missawesome03, you have demonstrated that your actions were not in good faith. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rachna1324 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The sole purpose to create another account was just to do what I like as in letting people know that there are other valuable references on internet. I still will stick to my point that I am not representing any company and that I am an individual. If you yourself look the quality of Bloomberg videos that content which they carry is by and large better than other news channels. If you unblock my previous account Rachna1324 I won't have any need for using any other account.

Decline reason:

We don't permit single-purpose link canvassing-only accounts. Your unblock request will be considered if you stop adding links to btvin. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:03, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rachna1324 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sure I agree to that and I won't be just using btvin as a citation.

Decline reason:

Similar to Ohnoitsjamie, I think you should agree to not use btvin as a citation at all from now on. PhilKnight (talk) 11:44, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would amend that from I won't be just using btvin as a citation to I won't be ~~just~~ using btvin as a citation. - i.e., you agree to stop posting links to btvin. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:44, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rachna1324 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok fine I won't be using btvin citations at all.

Accept reason:

Following your agreement not to add btvin citations, I've unblocked your account. PhilKnight (talk) 15:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rachna1324/sandbox[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Rachna1324/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Fayenatic London 09:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]