User talk:Radosław Wiśniewski

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Radosław Wiśniewski. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Racklever (talk) 09:08, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bogusław Mec (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JHUbal27 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bogusław Mec and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~JHUbal27 02:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Radosław Wiśniewski, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~JHUbal27 02:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betty Cody has been accepted

Betty Cody, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:46, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dee Harvey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Just as I Am. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

RE: Curtis Lee

Dziękuję. Quis separabit? 13:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

RE: Betty Cody

Zapraszamy serdecznie. Quis separabit? 14:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Herb Jeffries

added links pointing to Independent, Tony Martin and Legacy

Georges Descrières

added a link pointing to National Order of Merit

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larry Ramos has been accepted

Larry Ramos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

BenLinus1214^talk 16:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chip Damiani (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chip Damiani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 22:33, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

A summary of site policies and guidelines you may find useful

• "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
• Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
• We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
• A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
• Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
• Biographies of persons assumed to be alive are held to especially high standards of verifiability -- all unsourced information may be removed, no matter how plausible.
• Noone owns any article here, or even their edits to articles. The text at the bottom of the edit page, right above the "Save page" button basically means that if you don't want someone to change or even remove what you add, then you need to use another site.
• Assume good faith as much as reasonably possible, and then about half-way past the border for unreasonable possibility.
• Users should never make personal attacks on others. It's a good idea to avoid commenting on people, but on content, and then if necessary, actions.

Ian.thomson (talk) 15:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chip Damiani has been accepted

Chip Damiani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Don Covay

I see that you added details of a couple of non-chart singles to the section headed "Chart singles". I'm not sure whether it would be better simply to revert your edit, or to develop the section to provide a comprehensive list of his singles, derived from a full discography such as this one. Personally, I would prefer to keep the heading, and limit the contents to those records that did make the charts, but I didn't want to simply revert you without getting your opinion. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

What I suggest for the time being is that we add a "bubbling under" note to the list - you can add your reference if you like - and then decide on the way forward. As I said, I prefer to limit these lists to singles that made the chart, rather than attempting to be comprehensive, but I don't have a strong view if you would prefer to make it more comprehensive. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

It will be ok if we revert my last edit. The section is headed "Chart singles" not just "Singles" (as I had thought) so let's leave it just as it had been. Radosław Wiśniewski (talk) 13:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Radosław Wiśniewski

I'll leave it up to you. I've added the words "Bubbling under". Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dave Dee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tommy Ramone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Julius LaRosa

• "[i]t's about teaching me a lesson, and telling me that this is your playground". That is untrue. I left an edit summary for you to digest, containing hopefully some useful info. for you. Wikipedia is no playground for serious editors and I have never (since I began editing in 2005) been accused of that particular offense. Quis separabit? 12:13, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

I have gone out of my way to be friendly. When I thanked you for your edits to Betty Cody and Curtis Lee (see above) I didn't get the courtesy of a you're welcome, which a guy old enough to be a grandfather (as you say you are) would have been expected to reply (at minimum). Quis separabit? 12:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Earl Bostic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 19:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

RE 1926

Sadly I do not. However, this edit is about the fact that Julie London is not chattel and was notable in her own right rather than as Jack Webb's wife. Fixed my mistake. Quis separabit? 14:25, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Tense for year articles

First of all, what you wrote doesn't make any sense: "Simple Past Tense not Simple Past". Where does it say what "we use"? Before I made the edit, I looked everywhere. I wouldn't do all that work (and have it reverted) without checking first. WP:WikiProject Years says nothing, I searched the talk page archives, the month / year articles use past tense (so why should year articles use present?), and most importantly, here's what it says in WP:MOSTENSE: "do not use past tense except for deceased subjects, past events, and subjects that no longer meaningfully exist as such." So, you would need a really good explanation to go against that. --Musdan77 (talk) 17:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bogusław Mec

Hello, Radosław Wiśniewski. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Bogusław Mec".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chuck Pyle has been accepted

Chuck Pyle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 07:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Cry of Love

Hi! I wish to apologise for my reversion of your good faith edit for Kelly Holland's age at death. It was accidental. I believe this is only my second edit I have made without an edit summary. Please forgive; I was actually looking for a reference to replace the non-working News and Observer. Fylbecatulous talk 20:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Meghan Trainor discography, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 17:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Interlude65 My mistake. I had tried and google info on the Kansas City police killing and at exactly the same time editing Meghan Trainor article, and by some freak accident I put it to the article. My apology. I never make test edits. I do my best not to make such awful mistakes, and I will try harder and pay more attention. I have to thank you for reverting it. Once again, my apology. Radosław Wiśniewski (talk)Radosław Wiśniewski

WikiProject Wildfire

Hello! I have recently started a new WikiProject and am trying to recruit new members. The project, WikiProject Wildfire, focuses on articles that relate to wildfires. There is a lot of work that needs to be done. From updating templates, to classifying and improving articles. Any level of commitment is welcome! If you care to just add some input on the founding of the new project, awesome. If you would like to take an active role in editing articles, that is awesome as well! Knowledge of wildfires is NOT a prerequisite for joining the project. In fact, it would be great to have some members of the project who are NOT fire-buffs. That way we make sure that articles aren't just written by and for people in the fire community. If this is something you have any interest in, I would love to have you join the project! Please feel free to join the discussion or leave me a message on my talk page. (Note that you are receiving this message from me because I saw you made multiple edits on a wildfire related page, specifically Sand Fire. Not just spamming you at random.) Hope you have a great day! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Ages for possibly living people

Hi. Just to note that we don't add the "and age" parameter in the infobox for an individual who is possibly living. These are generally people aged 90+ that we don't know if they are 100% alive. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 09:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Lugnuts. You're absolutely right. My mistake Radosław Wiśniewski (talk) 09:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Radosław Wiśniewski

No problem! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 09:23, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buster Cooper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Radosław Wiśniewski. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Radosław Wiśniewski. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)