User talk:RaincoatDance
Welcome[edit]
|
Copy edit notes[edit]
Thanks for your copy edit of Chengara as part of the GOCE's June blitz. I think your changes were all generally good. I took things a bit further, particularly with layout and tone. You can see my changes in this diff. Here are some notes:
- Names with multiple initials should have the initials separated by a non-breaking space: N.N. Rajappan → N. N. Rajappan (MOS:INITIALS)
- As this is an international encyclopedia, distances and other measurements should be given in metric and imperial units; this can be accomplished using Template:Convert.
The village enjoys a tropical climate
andThe best weather is from October to February
are subjective, with tone issues for an encylopedia. We should just state the facts. Change enjoys → has and rephrase the second. I ended up rewriting that paragraph for cohesion.- Watch the acronyms, and expand them when possible.
- Loanwords not common in non-specialized English (e.g.: panchayat) get italics (MOS:FOREIGNITALIC).
- mid is not a complete word and needs to by hyphenated: mid summer vacation → mid-summer vacation. Note that this differs from midsummer, which is marked by the summer solstice.
- The article lacked cohesion with 12 different L2 headers in the body; I tweaked the layout a bit and organized some of these as L3 headers.
- There was redundancy with a list of worship centres under "Institutions" repeated in the prose under "Religion"; I removed the former
- Keep in mind that section headers get sentence case: Tribal Agitations → Tribal agitations
The major service providers are [...] among others
Major ... and others is generally redundant. For an encyclopedic summary just list the major points. By saying they are "major" indicates it is not an exhaustive list, and unnecessary to tag on "among others".private buses satisfy the transportation needs
to say they "satisfy" the needs is an opinion and needs a citation. However, because this is something that could be outdated anyways, better to rephrase so that it is a neutral statement without implying the buses are adequate or inadequate to the village's transportation needs.Attachakal-Malayalapuzha road and Attachakal-Kumblampoika road
if these are roads connecting Attachakal to Malayalapuzha and to Kumblampoika, then they should have an en dash in the name instead of a hyphen; the en dash indicates separation, as in a from/to relationship.- The tribal agitations section mostly describes past events and so needed to be in past tense. I tagged it for updating.
Extra stuff:
- For the infobox, it's recommended to not use flags unless the subject has a strong national connection, as the graphic can give undue emphasis and violate neutrality (MOS:INFOBOXFLAG).
- The infobox should only state the most important key information about the subject (MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE). I removed the zero km coastline as irrelevant.
- The lead could be expanded to reflect the content of the article, but it probably isn't worthwhile when so much of the body is unsourced.
I think you did a really good job considering the quality of the article. Try to watch for some of the things I mentioned in your next copy edits. Pay attention to the details and you'll get the hang of it. – Reidgreg (talk) 16:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice! Some of those points I never realised, and about the tone and opinions, I guess I wasn't being bold enough to correct them. – RaincoatDance (talk) 16:57, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Rosetta Barnstar |
| Thank you for translating articles. Eostrix (🦉hoot hoot🦉) 12:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC) |
June 2020 GOCE blitz bling[edit]
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to RaincoatDance for copy edits totaling over 6,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE June 2020 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 17:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC) |
Thank you for participating in the blitz! Please consider voting in the GOCE coordinator elections which are open through 30 June. – Reidgreg (talk) 17:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Some falafel for you![edit]
|
hello! :) Ishbel Dyke (talk) 12:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC) |
A kitten for you![edit]
Hello! Thanks for joining the EUSci edit-a-thon!
Onymous Otter (talk) 12:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
The article Torre Roble has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable building.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 15:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Sotero Prieto Rodríguez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:NSCHOLAR, in fact, he allegedly committed suicide just because of his lack of accomplishment.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 13:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Sotero Prieto Rodríguez for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sotero Prieto Rodríguez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sotero Prieto Rodríguez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 16:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Reality shifting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article heavily relies on anecdotal evidence and social media trends as a basis for its claims. The fact that reality shifting gained popularity on platforms like TikTok does not inherently validate its legitimacy or make it worthy of an encyclopedic article. Without substantial scientific research or scholarly consensus supporting the existence or efficacy of reality shifting, the article lacks the necessary foundation to provide readers with accurate and reliable information. Also, the inclusion of outdated studies, such as the CIA's research on altered states of consciousness in the 1950s, does not contribute to the credibility of the topic in its present context. Neuroscience has made significant advancements since then, and it is crucial to prioritize contemporary research when discussing such topics.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Reality shifting for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reality shifting (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Janhrach (talk) 10:48, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)