User talk:RajaYuvan

Welcome![edit]

Hello, RajaYuvan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page A. R. Rahman have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. = Arjayay (talk) 10:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to A. R. Rahman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Technically indistinguishable accounts editing the same topics: Arrahman718272 and MusicLover77778888. If there is any further socking or evidence unpaid editing, you will be blocked indefinitely. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RajaYuvan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wish to get unblocked so that I can edit other pages with valuable contributions and reliable sources. RajaYuvan (talk) 08:04, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request to Unblock.[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RajaYuvan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia because I understand that using multiple accounts is abusive and repeated editing without reliable source is offensive and will not continue that and make useful contributions to Wikipedia pages

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: block has expired. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unable to edit.[edit]

Why I'm unable to edit the page Ilaiyaraaja ? Is there any problem ? RajaYuvan (talk) 00:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problem in saving edit.[edit]

My edits in the page Ilaiyaraaja is not getting saved. What's the reason ? RajaYuvan (talk) 00:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

warning[edit]

It's obvious that you don't understand or are unable to follow basic editing requirements and are causing disruption, even though it may not be intentional. If this continues then your editing privileges will be revoked. Can you explain why this edit of yours is bad? —SpacemanSpiff 07:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware of adding sources. I sincerely apologize for that and will not repeat the mistake and try to contribute to the pages with reliable sources. RajaYuvan (talk) 07:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

YOu're at it again now at Ilaiyaraaja, so it's very obvious that you lack the competence required to edit here and despite my last note, this behavior of yours continues. I will block you soon, unless there's a credible explanation, but the next time I will just block you, no more warnings as you are wasting the time of many productive editors here.—SpacemanSpiff 16:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits.[edit]

So many data have been deleted by unknown persons. I report vandalism. Lock this page for the protection. RajaYuvan (talk) 16:13, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for lacking competence to edit here.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 16:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added the deleted information.[edit]

I just add the deleted information with sources. Unknown people delete the informations which are already present in the page with reliable sources. RajaYuvan (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request.[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RajaYuvan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just reverted the edits. Somebody deleted all the valuable information of the page. So I added the information again with reliable sources. I request to unblock.

Decline reason:

This request does not address the competence issues raised. As such, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 21:30, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RajaYuvan (talk) 16:22, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RajaYuvan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the wikipedia rules and I agree that I lacked competence in editing. I sincerely apologize for that and now clearly learned how to handle the pages so I request the administrators to unblock me as I wish to contribute more for the development and wellness of Wikipedia by adding more information with apt sources

Decline reason:

This unblock appeal does not provide any demonstration of competence. Given your history, we are not going to unblock your account without some actual evidence that you understand how to use the site. You can provide this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Save.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RajaYuvan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm now familiar with our basic rules and read the guide to improving articles thoroughly. I agree that previously I lacked competence but now I'm clear about everything. I assure you that my previous mistakes will not be repeated and I apologize for attempting multi reversions which is totally wrong. Now I understand the Wikipedia rules clearly. I wish to continue contributing more valuable data to Wikipedia pages hence I request you to unblock me

Decline reason:

Obviously not. If you wish to be unblocked, follow the instructions you were given above. Yamla (talk) 11:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please follow the instructions given in your last unblock request to demonstrate your competence. 331dot (talk) 08:28, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]