User talk:Rajpalsinghr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2018[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Naagin (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend () 12:13, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Rajpalsinghr", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it seems to be impersonating a real person. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. AussieLegend () 12:22, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Rajpalsinghr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 13:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Rajpal Singh Rajput 13:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

bio[edit]

[balaji 1]

Rajpalsinghr, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Rajpalsinghr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty clear to me that you were making unsourced edits from this IP address, and once I blocked that IP for adding unsourced content in violation of WP:CRYSTAL, you logged in and made the changes from your account. 1) Stop making squirrely edits like this. Edit while logged in, not whiled logged out. 2) When your block expires, I strongly recommend you stop making edits about yourself, like the Draft:Rajpal Singh Rajput article you're trying to build. You have a clear conflict of interest, and if you keep making promotional edits, you're going to be blocked indefinitely. Wikipedia is not a social networking platform or a marketing website. We only care about notable people, i.e. ones that have received a great deal of bona fide, independent press coverage. (Not interviews, not press releases.) An actor with one credit to his name, I'm sorry to say, is not notable yet. See WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Naagin (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 05:53, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Naagin (TV series). Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 07:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rajpal, per these changes, even if we Wikipedia editors were to assume that you are the actor in question, and that you were indeed going to be working on Naagin S3, all content must be verifiable by our readers. This means (basically) that they need to be able to click a link and be taken to a reputable website that supports the claim being made. If there are no news sites that are reporting on your participation in the series, then we have to omit the content. Once the series airs and your name appears in credits, then we could include the information, provided that our editors feel your role is significant enough to include. And once again, Wikipedia is not a promotional platform. You should not be here to promote your upcoming work. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Rajpalsinghr. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 14:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]
Please note that your failure to heed the advice already given you by other editors above (and now also by me at the at the Teahouse) could so easily result in you being blocked again if you persist in trying to promote your name in articles without supplying any evidence to that effect. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:06, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, most recently this, where you again submit unsourced claims about your role in a project. As noted multiple times, we require all content to be verifiable. If there is nothing published about your participation in a TV series, then the content, from our perspective, is unverifiable. Additionally, you should not be using Wikipedia to promote yourself. You have a clear conflict of interest, and you should not be editing subjects that you are closely linked to. If the self-promotion continues, you will find your editing privileges revoked again. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Cite error: There are <ref group=balaji> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=balaji}} template (see the help page).