User talk:Rakeshroshan1992

If you have any doubts regarding my contributions. please leave message on my talk page.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Rakeshroshan1992! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:36, Wednesday, July 25, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

"Clear citations provided"[edit]

Please don't add citations unless it is clear exactly what content in the article the citations are supposed to verify. . . Mean as custard (talk) 11:16, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure will make it clear from now. Thanks for verifying. Rakeshroshan1992 (talk) 11:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth (August 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rakeshroshan1992! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth[edit]

I have moved you client work back to draft Draft:Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth. Please leave it for independent reviewer to accept but stop removing decline template and moving it especially not after you indicated you're paid to create this by the subject. And besides that, also stop removing the decline and moving them to mainspace like here whether you'r paid or not. –Ammarpad (talk) 09:20, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Already got paid for the content and also will revamp decline request. Made a new section on your talk page regarding it. Depending on independent reviewer from past 4 weeks but no response. Will review and move article to main-space as per the client request. Rakeshroshan1992 (talk) 11:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We are a volunteer organisation and unlike you, do not wish to exploit an encyclopedia for promoting your subject by piss-poor writings.Consequently, your work needs to be scrutinized by a neutral pair of experienced eyes to maintain the quality of the encyclopedia. That we are all volunteers, the concept of time delay is immaterial.

Consider that, we are gracious enough to help you to craft a good article, despite being volunteers and fully knowing that you are exploiting us to generate an article (if that is remotely feasible per our notability guidelines) in the sense that you will be the sole one to be rewarded with a dole of favors.

And, as long as you choose to edit over here, your primary allegiance shall be to the Wikipedian community and our policies and guidelines.We don't give a damn as to the wishes of your client and any effort to circumvent those will lead to a revocation of editing privileges.4 weeks, 4 months, 4 years.Does not matter an iota.∯WBG^converse 12:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hope all your arguments are valid for me but there should be limit to abuse me with provoking language rather i just simply put forth my concerns that doesn't seems to be invalid as a user. I hope this message is taken in positive note for our administrators. Rakeshroshan1992 (talk) 16:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth (October 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ammarpad were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Ammarpad (talk) 05:24, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth[edit]

Draft:Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Vijaya Bhaskar Jatoth during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 06:51, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article. Rakeshroshan1992 (talk) 11:38, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]