User talk:Ramsso

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ramsso! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 talk 20:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects[edit]

Hi there Ramsso. I see you've been creating pages which just consist of a link to another page. If you'd like the page to redirect to another page (i.e. go directly to the target when you go to the redirect page), than you can use this code: #REDIRECT [[<TargetPageNameHere>]]. If that doesn't make sense, or you have any other questions, feel free to drop by my talk page. Cheers - Kingpin13 (talk) 21:08, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Blocked[edit]

When reviewing some of the images you uploaded without licenses, I came across one case where you had copied this image and claimed it was your own. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images - you can't take images from other websites and simply upload them here claiming them as your own. To prevent further problems with copyright violations, I have blocked your account indefinitely - this does not mean forever, but it does mean that you will stay blocked until such time as you let me know you understand what the problem was and agree not to do it again. Thanks. Shell babelfish 01:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image upload problems

File copyright problem with File:Saint Katherine 53 Almond.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Saint Katherine 53 Almond.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY (TALK) 22:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Baltim, frozen plant 1.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Baltim, frozen plant 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 23:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Saint Katherine 49 Snow storm.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Saint Katherine 49 Snow storm.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY (TALK) 23:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Damanhour 1.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Damanhour 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 23:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Baltim Snow 1.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Baltim Snow 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY (TALK) 23:10, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Dahab 17.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Dahab 17.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY (TALK) 23:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Dahab in April.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Dahab in April.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY (TALK) 23:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Shar'eya hail & snow 1.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Shar'eya hail & snow 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY (TALK) 23:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Saint Katherine 87.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Saint Katherine 87.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Mount Kathrine 1.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Mount Kathrine 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Saint Katherine 54.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Saint Katherine 54.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:010-snow.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:010-snow.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ramsso (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

There is a retired administrator named Shell Kinney who blocked this IP Address for years. This pathetic action from her behalf affects all the people using this IP Address. This IP Address block must be removed since it's illogical

Decline reason:

This isn't an IP block; your account is directly blocked, and rightfully so. Given the ad hominem comment against the blocking administrator and the fact that you don't discuss why you're blocked in any reasonable way, this request is obviously declined. Kinu t/c 19:03, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ramsso (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't know but we can send to you a printscreen of what's written in front of us and you'll see that it say "Shell Kinney" has blocked this IP Address entirely! That's what appears on the screen!

Decline reason:

No, the IP address is autoblocked because this blocked account used it; the block message makes that pretty clear. --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ramsso (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So...! What shall we do! How did we now benefit from the Wiki unblock service! How can this IP "autoblock" and the account block be solved. Thanks in advance

Decline reason:

Addressing the actual reason for your block would be a good start. You'll also need to address the socking concerns below. Unfortunately, you seem to have continued the problematic copyright problems with several of your socks; that's going to make it hard to trust your ability to discern the problem here. Kuru (talk) 01:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please disclose all of your other accounts, aside from the ones that have already been tagged as your sockpuppets. --Kinu t/c 00:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ramsso (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Unlike the administrator Kingpin13 who provided help with the linking issue between pages which we weren't able to do correctly. He helped us and didn't block the IP Address, that's while the admin Shell blocked the IP Address as a whole when saw a problem with image uploading. The policies of images use in Wikipedia is perfect but we weren't able to implement those rules and make use of them while uploading the image in the interface of articles. Moreover, UNLIKE what that Shell weirdly claimed no one from our side claimed that we are the pictures' owners because UNDOUBTEDLY i'm not a good photographer and we don't have a camera. We used those image as they perfectly delivered the message and where valuable representatives for the content and we DID provide the names of the real owners of the images we knew their owners. We failed to find the names of other photos' owners. And SURELY the rules of this issue are pretty clear on Wikipedia but they weren't easy to conduct inside the interface of uploading images. And there are some other weird issues like deleting a logo that we uploaded and i'm its designer! And we mentioned in the boxes of the interface of uploading images that we are the owners of the logo that we really designed, however it was erased!

Decline reason:

There are a number of problems with your request. Firstly, I agree with Anthony Bradbury about your use of first person plural implying this is a shared account. Secondly, I suggest you stop criticizing Shell Kinney, who as far as I can tell acted properly. Lastly, even if you created a logo, if it's copyrighted, then it can be deleted if it's unused. PhilKnight (talk) 14:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In addition to the problems discussed in the above unblock requests, your phraseology suggests that this account is used by more than one person. Shared accounts are absolutely forbidden. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]