User talk:RanDawg

More Questions[edit]

I'm getting tired of scrolling w/o a scroll wheel on the schools stupid mouses. I read about something called a double redirect, what is it, why does it need to be fixed, and how do I fix them?RanDawg 14:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you study programming, you will find that redirects are like pointers. They point the readers to another page. For example, HKCL points to Hong Kong Central Library. Then we may have a representation like:

HKCL  -->  Hong Kong Central Library

However, note that the redirect is just an arrow. It does not specify the content of the target. The target could be anything. In case the target of a redirect is itself a redirect, then problems come up. Say:

Pagename 1 --> Pagename 2 --> Pagename 3

This kind of situation is called a double redirect.

In most cases double redirects, or better termed, "redirects that target redirects", aren't big problems, as the real target can be traced continuously following the arrows. However, as I've said before, the target can be any page. If the target can be a redirect, then why can't the redirects cause a cyclic flow and finally go back to the source? Say:

P1 --> P2 --> P3
 ^             |
 |             v
P5 <--------- P4

Normally when the user tries to retrieve a page which is a redirect, the target page will be displayed because the route is automatically traced by the server. However, the process ought not re-iterate in case the above cyclic situation happens. Otherwise the server will break down due to improper user data. (In this context "improper user data" refers to the cyclic redirects)

So to solve this problem, the MediaWiki engine could do nothing but to stop tracing redirects at one hop. In other words, if a reader tries to retrieve Pagename 1 as of the second chart above, the server will output Pagename 2 saying it is a redirect to Pagename 3, instead of hopping to Pagename 3. With this regulatory feature, the server will not crash when it encounters cycles.

But this causes a decrease in readability. When a user retrieves Pagename 1, he wouldn't get anything useful but a redirect link, which is Pagename 2 asking the user to click Pagename 3. So, to solve this problem, whenever editors see redirect targets as redirects, they should retarget the redirect. In the Pagename 1 case, you should edit Pagename 1 (instead of Pagename 2, which is what you get when you deliberately click Pagename 1 without forcing "redirect=no"). Then the situation becomes:

Pagename 1  (skipped) Pagename 2 ---> Pagename 3
  \                                     /
   -------------------------------------

This fixing process is called "fixing a double redirect".

Of course, the cyclic situation, as I've said above, is just a dramatic magnification of the double redirect situation. If something like that ever happens in real life, the pages would be brought to WP:RFD as "improper redirects" or even "deliberate technical vandalism".

Hope this long essay helps your understanding to the stuff. Exam in 10 hours, I ought not talk too much. --Der yck C. 14:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch. Forgot the first question. The keyboard up/down buttons have the same function as the scrollbar when you view webpages. Hope this trivia helps. --Der yck C. 14:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That helped. Good luck on your exam!RanDawg 18:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did you do the boxes? Theres no wiki codeRanDawg 17:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prepend a spacebar to the beginning of each line. Alternatively, you can use <pre> ... </pre>. --Der yck C. 05:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For my page on Reform the resistance, I need to add references. How would I do that?RanDawg 14:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are actually a few ways to add references. One way is to simply add a "references" section and bullet/numbered-list the reference items in it. The other way, which creates numbered footnote anchors, required some wiki markup. At the point where you want to add the note flag (something like ^[1]) you add a <ref>Something</ref> tag, where the "Something" is the thing you want to display in the footnote. At the bottom of the page, you add a <references/> tag or a {{reflist}} template. For an example of both types of referencing, you may see an article that I've long been working on, Lam Tin. --Der yck C. 04:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So how do I get it so when you click on the [1] it will go to the link at the bottom of the page? I saw this on the Lam Tin Article, but couldent get it to work.--RanDawg 17:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to look at Wikipedia:Footnotes for an elaborate tutorial on how to use the ref tags. I think that page will give a better explanation than I could. --Der yck C. 04:31, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now there's a lot of security stuff about my password. Is this wikiwide or just me and I need to get a better password?--RanDawg 14:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is wiki-wide. Everybody gets the same notice. Don't worry, and remember don't tell anybody your password even if it's very secure. --Der yck C. 05:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How would I make a user taskbar?RanDawg 14:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User taskbar? I'm not sure what specific thing are you referring to, but most likely the "taskbars" can be created as tables on user pages, or alternatively you might want to use {{to do}}. --Der yck C. 03:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been given permission to use pictures from a band, how would I upload them and prove I have permission to use them.--RanDawg 17:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should upload the picture and put a copy of the written permission given by the band into the Summary section. Then, according to the guidelines, you should also mail a copy of the written permission to (somewhere I forgot) as stated on the uploads page. --Der yck C. 06:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ADOPT[edit]

I saw that you wish to be adopted. Is it okay if I become your adopter? Please reply at my talk page. Thanks. --Der yck C. 16:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So it's my pleasure to adopt you. Happy working together =] What do you wish to start with? Or should you wait until you have a problem and then come to me? --Der yck C. 08:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've change the template on your userpage to show that you've already been adopted by me. You can have a look at it. --Der yck C. 08:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know how to create my own page, with references etc. i.e. how to do the [citation needed] RanDawg 13:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. To create a new page, you can start from a redlink on an existing article. (redlinks are links showing in red words; they link to edit pages of nonexistent articles) For the "citation needed" flag, you can use {{cn}}. How's your progress with the articles? --Der yck C. 15:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm doing pretty well with my articles, but progress is slow because I have dial-up at home and can only work on them at school. RanDawg 18:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't matter. But be aware that since you use shared computers, the IP you use may be previously used by vandals, and therefore you may be blocked due to collateral damage. Sometimes your IP will be blocked as "open proxies" when you actually aren't, because of the large number of vandals using the same IP. I encounter this situation fairly frequently. So if you encounter an autoblock due to collateral damage, leave a message so that some other admins or I can help you. --Der yck C. 11:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Good advice, as most of the people at my school would do that sort of thing. RanDawg 14:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a hard-ban against Open proxies. However, private or "closed" proxies are generally allowed. So you may consider using private proxy servers to edit, so as to avoid being rotated to IPs previously used by vandals. --Der yck C. 05:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All the proxy servers are blocked by our school server. Which of course is mandated by law. I think that whole concept is stupid, but since I can't vote, I don't have a voice. Yeah, im ranting. sorry. RanDawg 14:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do I insert a image into a page/userbox. I tried to do that with my WCS userbox, but it didn't work.RanDawg 18:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To insert an image, use the tag [[Image:(image name)|(optional formatting options, eg thumb, left, right, size; can be used in combination)|(optional caption)]].

For example, [[Image:Sin Fat Road, Sai Tso Wan.jpg|thumb|left|450px|Sin Fat Road near Sai Tso Wan Recreation Ground]] will become:

Sweet! After a few false starts, I finally got a picture of a wolverine in my WCS userbox. RanDawg 18:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not bad, you can move on to more contentious edits. Then you will find your real purpose on Wikipedia. Everybody has something that others cannot produce. Show others your ability. --Der yck C. 10:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What happens when two people edit the same page simutaniously? How will the edit come out? On an unrelated note, how do I make a page different colors?RanDawg 14:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An edit conflict will occur. The editor who pressed the save button later will have his request rejected. To make a page show different colours, you can use HTML and CSS tags, for example, <font color=green>green text</font> will give green text. --Der yck C. 08:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any way to do a #REDIRECT command to an outside link?RanDawg 17:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, redirect works only for pages within the same site. You may see Wikipedia:Soft redirect for further details. --Der yck C. 05:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian Metal[edit]

Hey if you would like to join the project the first thing you should do is add your name to the list of members.--E tac 09:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Justifide life outside the toybox.jpg[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Justifide life outside the toybox.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Justifide life outside the toybox.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Justifide life outside the toybox.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You Tube links in User:RanDawg/cmv subpage[edit]

When adding links to material on an external site, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website has licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sfan00 IMG 13:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Full Armor of God Broadcast[edit]

Comment Full Armor of God Broadcast is facing deletion. Any advice, assistance or help would be much appreciated! Help represent NON-SELLOUT Christian Metal!! Help The Full Armor of God Broadcast keep giving the devil a blackeye on Wikipedia!Ivanhoe610fa (talk) 03:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:The Beauty of the Unknown.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Beauty of the Unknown.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 00:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Beauty of the Unknown.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Beauty of the Unknown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:12, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012[edit]

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Nomination of Justifide for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justifide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justifide until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JudeccaXIII (talk) 03:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:WikiProject Worcester Central School members has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:WikiProject Worcester Central School members, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ‑ Iridescent 13:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Justifide life outside the toybox.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Justifide life outside the toybox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Beauty of the Unknown.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Beauty of the Unknown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]