User talk:RandomXYZb/Archive 1

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vand on my user page. «razorclaw» 21:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Animal Ethics

I noticed you attached a copyvio note to this article - please make it clear where it is a violation from. Thanks! – Riana _ऋ 11:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

• Apologies. First use of db-copyvio. Have corrected the oversight. Gilesbennett 12:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for responding to my helpme request! Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 19:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

My user page

I know. I reverted more vandalism and realized you had not gone back far enough. In essence, I ended up trashing my own page. I was sitting here cracking up. When it comes to recent changes coupled with active vandals, these mistakes are easily made, so don't stress it! When all else fails, sit back, look through the page history, and revert to an older (aka 'last good') version. the_undertow ^talk 20:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

O Boy! The crazies are hitting me all at once. Thanks for helping me out. I feel so vulnerable. Haha. Must...get...dressed...today. the_undertow ^talk 21:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

O, you were referring to the emo content on my talk page. My talk page isn't protected, so anyone can edit. But don't worry about reverting my talk page because I don't mind the vandals expressing their opinions. the_undertow ^talk 03:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for cleaning up the vandalism on my userpage. Take care. King Lopez ^Contribs 09:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

mushIT

Being a new member, I accidently deleted the speedy deletion tag on the article mushIT. I have changed the article though and hope it fits into the mould of an encylopedic article.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by mushIT (talk • contribs)

Nice work

With anti-vandalism out there. Cheers, Dfrg.msc 22:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary on CSD pages

Hello, when nominating a page for speedy deletion, please leave an edit summary saying this so it makes it easier for recent changes patrollers and for people to determine what changes you made to the article. Thank you. — The Sunshine Man (a.k.a Tellyaddict) 10:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Great, just thought I'd tell you. Happy editing! — The Sunshine Man (a.k.a Tellyaddict) 10:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

When leaving {{db-copyvio}}, please do it in the format of {{db-copyvio|URL of website copied from here}}. Thank you. — The Sunshine Man 11:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

On the Hatim at-Taai article. Regards — The Sunshine Man 11:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Great, I dont think you need to add the nowiki tags, you simply just add {{db-copyvio|http://www.google.co.uk}} (for example) but which ever is easiest for you. — The Sunshine Man 11:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Articles on Whitworth brothers

Thanks for the note. Even if the subjects were notable the articles would have required a lot of work. We may be dealing with a young contributor. I have left suggestions on the user's talk page in the hopes that the user will not get discouraged, but will more carefully choose, research and compose articles. Kablammo 14:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Signing

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! Oreo202 chat 15:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for vandal fighting! Oreo202 chat 15:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Much appreciated! Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 21:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Reverting changes to User:Skankyyoda

I'd appreciate if you didn't revert helpful changes to userpages. Although you weren't to know of my affiliation with Skankyyoda (unless you had actually read the page where it clearly states our friendship), it would probably be wise to check what has actually been changed to see if it is vandalism or a useful edit... It would be nice if you refrained from reverting any future edits that I might make in Skankyyoda's page. Thanks. D4g0thur 03:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding; I can see where you were coming from. D4g0thur 07:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

shock_site_edit_war

You fascist. Why the hell do you keep on deleting my perfectly legal article. I read trough all the Wiki rules before posting. Just that you dont agree with the content doesnt mean you can delete it. Read the Wiki rules, it clearly stats you need to be ojective. Im calling you fascits from a objectiv point by the way, just stating a fact. I base that fact on you deleting good information which the world should know. Ravo5002 09:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

My response copied from Ravo5002's talk page Thank you for your comment on my talk page regarding "shock site edit war". If you look into the matter a little further, I think you'll find that I didn't in any way comment, delete, or otherwise involve myself with the page concerned. My only involvement was to post a warning to you regarding vandalism to other people's user pages. I've subsequently also reverted the changes you made to your own talk page subverting the warnings from myself and other users. Gilesbennett 11:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

The 4 Skins

Just writing to confirm that I am the author of the recent changes and to permit re-use under the GFDL. These changes are a summary from my web site ( http://the4skins.tripod.com/ which is shown as a link on the wikipedia page) for use on other web sites and has already been used on sites such as knowledgerush.com . Hope this is ok and will allow the changes to stand and give some further detail on this band.

I tried using the advice to email to permissions from my e-mail associated with the site (the4skins2004@yahoo.co.uk) but with no luck,it said that it wasnt a valid e-mail address. If there is a different e-mail address I'd be grateful if you could send it onto me

Thanks

Tommy Cassidy --The4skins2004 19:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Validity of Myspace and other social sites in Wikipedia

I'm a new user and merely expressing my coolest site findings and entered it in. I'm a little annoyed that my page is now 'flagged' and must be deleted as I tried to copy what 'myspace' did with their page in order for it to look a little more formal than how I would express to my own friends. So I want to know how it works when 'myspace', kaboodle, and other social sites can even have their links AND logos on wikipedia when my page about FASHION and my newest website find for this interest is considered propaganda? Please let me know as I am eagerly awaiting your response. —Preceding unsigned comment added by trendiki (talk • contribs)

notability

I see, according to your helpful link of notability in entries, that you require a secondary reference to make this notable. When further researching other social sites within wikipedia- I noted: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playahead that has no references (as I didn't take the time to reference trendiki.com) as well as it's alexa rating is 75,678 (much different from it's 2,000 ranking statement) and I see that Trendiki holds 62,000 spot. Not much to brag about- but I also noted another "social site" on your list "deadjournal" ranking at 89,155- really not popular. Trendiki 20:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)