User talk:Rantemario

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Rantemario! Thank you for your contributions. I am Doug Weller and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Doug Weller talk 06:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		Great photos for Protestantism in Indonesia! Rpclod (talk) 23:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indigenous people of the Americas[edit]

Sorry but before your edit a large amount of sourced material was removed with the edit summary "citation needed" and to restore it I had to go back to an earlier version. Doug Weller talk 06:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Indonesia

added a link pointing to Papua

Mongoloid

added a link pointing to Filipino

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Indonesian occupation of East Timor into East Timor. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:39, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry User:Diannaa, I forgot to add the attribution. I will avoid the mistake next time. Rantemario (talk) 23:13, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Rantemario. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 06:20, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert on the Taiwan article[edit]

The edit you reverted here was not vandalism as defined on Wikipedia in WP:VANDAL, which you linked in your edit summary. It was an attempt to tighten the section and more accurately represent the sources. I have re-instated the edit. If you have content-based objections to it, please state them. Kanguole 02:50, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to your objections at Talk:Taiwan#Edit to Prehistory section. Kanguole 00:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a bit more – please discuss there. Kanguole 18:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 16:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Larantuka Kingdom[edit]

Hi, I reverted your edit to the Indonesia article because the Larantuka Kingdom was only a minor entity, compared with the other topics in the list you added it to. Can I suggest that if you believe it is noteworthy that you create a Larantuka Kingdom article, with proper citations. Regards Davidelit (Talk) 14:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did some literature lookup when I made Kingdom of Larantuka and while it was an interesting tidbit of history, pretty sure its presence definitely didn't affect Indonesia's history to the point where it warrants its own era. Juxlos (talk) 15:40, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you thank you thank you so much for creating Kingdom of Larantuka article! You are now officially my favorite contributor in Wikipedia. :D Ya, mungkin Kerajaan Larantuka hanya terbatas sampai Flores, tapi, apakah kerajaan sebesar itu tidak dianggap sebagai sejarah Indonesia? Dan apalagi, dengan keunikannya sebagai satu-satunya kerajaan Kristen di Indonesia bahkan di Asia Tenggara. Menurut Anda bagaimana? Salam. Rantemario (talk) 20:34, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's the thing. It's extremely notable but I don't think it's important enough in the grand scheme of things to make its own category in the template.

The main difference between it and many small unlisted polities is the fact that it considers itself a tributary of Portugal and is Catholic - not because it fought its way up until the 20th century (Aceh), say.

Tapi ya kalau menurut anda itu sesuai disana, satu kategori tersendiri, ya sudah.Juxlos (talk) 08:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is extremely notable and important. Maybe because there were many kingdoms in Indonesia, this one is overshadowed by the others. Dan, karena sudah sesuai dengan templat id:Templat:Sejarah Indonesia, menurut saya cocok ditempatkan di kategori sendiri (mau ditaruh dimana lagi?). Hey, sebelum kerajaan Hindu Buddha, Indonesia juga mempunyai its own Prehistoric societies, and have its own category. Wikipedia is all about spreading information, no matter how "big" or "small" it is. Rantemario (talk) 13:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invite[edit]

Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs (talk) 06:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bali[edit]

Apa anda ada sumber bahwa Bali punya bendera provinsi? Hddty. (talk) 08:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note[edit]

Re: Indonesia

You have it all in the wrong order

You are likely to have sanctions (again) -

Accusing another editor of being a Vandal and Ownership in an edit summary - bad faith and WP:PA
Reverting another editor and saying take it to your personal talk page -

The subject actually is Indonesia - that is where the discussion is taken, not your talk page - that is Ownership on your part
Reverting in the way it was done is not Vandalism

Take care - hati hati - you need to understand the words more carefully - and their use. Your not touching the Indonesia article again and going to talk page and explaining in the talk page (as opposed to the edit summary) might show you can exercsie WP:AGF and show that you understand the mechanisms of what WP:NOT means. Thanks for that JarrahTree 09:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christian creeds revert on Christianity article[edit]

Can you tell me why did you revert my edit "of some denominations" with an explanation that there is no citation when the whole paragraph of Christian creeds doesn't have a citation? Why didn't you delete the whole paragraph then? Thinker78 (talk) 18:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rantemario. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Xavier[edit]

Would you describe Julius Caesar as Italian? Historical names are always used, not current names. Giant Snowman 16:51, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grotto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Modern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear Rantemario, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your recent expansion of Christian state. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 05:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Thank you for the Christianity Barnstar![edit]

Dear User:Rantemario, I'm so delighted that the barnstar brought you happiness. I'm glad that you're going to contribute your talents to WikiProject Christianity-related articles too. I wish you and yours a very Merry Christmas! With warm regards, Anupam^Talk 10:15, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anupam, I'm glad that I can help WikiProject Christianity. I wish you a very merry jolly Christmas too! With love, Rantemario (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gereja Santa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SJ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bittrex[edit]

Hello Rantemario,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bittrex for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Owlsmcgee (talk) 09:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... This is another cryptocurrency exchange like Kraken (bitcoin exchange), Coinbase, and Poloniex. Why does this article deemed "unimportant" and have to be deleted and the others not? --Rantemario (talk) 09:13, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptocurrency and Blockchain general sanctions[edit]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

TonyBallioni (talk) 17:29, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

St Andrew's Cathedral, Singapore[edit]

Please do not put a non-official language in Singapore article. Per MOS:FORLANG, non-English language should only be added when it is closely associated, and Indonesian is not closely associated with the cathedral. Otherwise anyone can also add Filipino and other languages, and it will become a mess. Hzh (talk) 10:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also WP:PLACE, foreign language names may be permitted if they are one used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or that is used by a group of people or is a local official name. Are there 10% of sources in Indonesian or are there 10% of Singapore population? Is Indonesian a local official name? Hzh (talk) 10:20, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michelangelo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inspiration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revert Balinese Hinduism[edit]

How about Staatblad no.226 July 1, 1929? I think caste section too confuse, some reference i read explain Balinese using caturwangsa or triwangsa. Btw, triwangsa not thrice born, tri=3, wangsa=dynasty.

Thanks for ur time, let's remove disambiguation. Chinamoonroll (talk) 23:53, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chinamoonroll, Aku tak terlalu mengerti tentang Hindu Bali dan detailnya, tapi kalau kamu tahu apa yang sebenarnya dan detail itu bagus, kamu bisa masukkan ke Wikipedia, ASAL kamu jangan ketik itu tulisan menurut pikiran mu sendiri. Karena itu memang sudah aturan dari Wikipedia:No original research. Jadi kamu kalau mau edit, tolong masukkan referensi" yang diperlukan misalnya kamu tulis klaim sesuatu harus ada referensi untuk membackup, karena Wikipedia ada aturannya. Kamu bisa masukkan referensi dengan menggunakan tag <ref>. Happy editing! :-) Rantemario (talk) 22:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rantemario, Aku masih belajar juga, ibarat skripsi mau apa-apa harus ada referensi, btw aku kebingungan mau upload photo sama ketentuan gimana ya?

Chinamoonroll (talk) 13:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chinamoonroll, memang Wikipedia itu bagaikan membuat skripsi. Setiap klaim yang kita tulis harus bisa kita pertanggungjawabkan. Karena Wikipedia adalah ensiklopedia untuk umat manusia. Jadi, lain kali kamu edit" harus ada sumbernya, ya. Untuk foto paling aman kamu upload foto 100% karyamu sendiri. Selamat datang di Wikipedia, semoga kamu betah. :) Rantemario (talk) 06:59, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editor buat sejarah perang di Bali siapa ya? Aku agak bingung sama perang Edisi perangnya. Sejarah Bali yang pas sih di https://id.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sejarah_Bali masalahnya ga bisa berkaitan setiap halamannya Chinamoonroll (talk) 02:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wah User:Chinamoonroll, aku kurang tahu ya. Aku kurang suka main di Wikipedia Indonesia hehehe. Aku lihat itu artikel parah banget, gak ada referensinya sama sekali. Kalau di Wikipedia English pasti udah di speedy delete itu artikel. Wkwkwk.
Kamu bisa lihat siapa" editornya di https://id.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sejarah_Bali&action=history . Coba kamu konfrontasi satu" untuk berargumen dan tuntut dari mana mereka dapat klaim" informasi demikian. Rantemario (talk) 04:45, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ga ada respon dari orang-orang sana, emang yang bahasa inggris lebih rapi sih, aku klo mau baca wiki milih yang bahasa inggris sih, kecuali yang bahasa inggrisnya kurang lengkap atau ga ada terpaksa. Chinamoonroll (talk) 15:10, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on National Hero of Indonesia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Accusing others of religious discrimination is a serious matter. If you believe I am "just removing Christian Indonesian heroes", you need to bring it up at ANI. As I said previously, the images were bleeding in to the footnotes, making the article look sloppy. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:50, 22 §July 2018 (UTC)

User:Crisco 1492 What is your problem? What resolution are you in? The article looks fine in my 1366x768 monitor on Mac. If you think that those pictures are unnecessary, why don't you delete them all? Please find the middle ground so we both can agree in. Rantemario (talk) 06:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My resolution is 1920*1080. When we are writing for Wikipedia, we need to recognize that our display resolution is not universal, and thus what shows up well for us will not necessarily show up well for everyone.

We are fortunate that, in the four years since this list passed Featured List, a lot of new images have become available. John Lie, for example, had no image of him until I found a copy of Jalesveva Jayamahe at the used books market; several of the other heroes are in a similar position. But we need to practice self-control.

That your thoughts go immediately to "all or nothing", and this after you accuse me of furthering an anti-Christian bias, suggests that we won't reach a "middle ground". The images in the list need more work than simple pruning (going back into alphabetical order, for example), and I don't see myself doing that with someone whose first response is to assume bad faith and accuse me of religious discrimination. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:40, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rantemario, let me just add that you should really stop with the personal attacks, such as this and this. Drmies (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK guys I am sorry if I accused you of bad faith. Sometimes I'm a little bit aggressive in Wikipedia, you know, because of the vandals and stuff. :( Rantemario (talk) 05:48, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Christmas Island. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kendall-K1 (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Indodax[edit]

The article Indodax has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability, negligible RS coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 09:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rantemario. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Protestant Church in Western Indonesia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bangka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juan Diego, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tilma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Can you please review this Wikipedia page? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ODEM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff at ODEM (talk • contribs) 07:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

parent cats[edit]

balinese hinduism is in hinduism - surely there is no need to add a parent and child cat? JarrahTree 23:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

rather than reverting my revert which leads you into WP:3RR and edit warring - try discussing first. Parent cats are not added unless you can show some very good reason reason why - just adding shows you might not understand category trees work.

Please try explaining why you did the placement of a parent cat with a child cat. Do you understand what I am saying? JarrahTree 23:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As you are not answering, I take your revert as a very uninformed and poor understanding of the parent child cat issue. JarrahTree 23:29, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yang pertama - artikel - dalam - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hinduism_in_Bali - ini cukup - bagaimana? sebab: -

Hinduism in Bali is in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hinduism_in_Indonesia and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Religion_in_Bali

Hinduism in Indonesia is in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hinduism_by_country and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hinduism_in_Southeast_Asia

in turn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hinduism_in_Asia and

To sidestep the category tree and and add 'hinduism' - is not normal WP:CATEGORISATION practice, it gives undue emphasis of the balinese form over and above all the content forms of hinduism the other countries.

There is no explanation anywhere, in the article, your lack of edit summary, or anywhere, as to why the balinese form is something that requires emphasis over and above all other forms the practice in southeast or asia in generalJarrahTree 23:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good points. Okay i am sorry. Rantemario (talk) 03:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please never apologise - please - learn !!! JarrahTree 04:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bali bombings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:LGBT saints[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:LGBT saints requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:52, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English[edit]

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Catholic Church, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 03:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Church article uses British English Oxford spelling. Rantemario (talk) 04:28, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bittrex[edit]

The article Bittrex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability per GNG not established for tiny American cryptocurrency exchange. It has only been covered in industry or local media, which does not signal notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 02:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bittrex for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bittrex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bittrex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 12:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits[edit]

Hi, Your edits show a consistent endeavour to push a particular viewpoint. Threats aside, please remember that Wikipedia is not a platform to promote a specific belief system. Please discuss controversial changes. Thank you. Davidelit (Talk) 02:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even have a bias or promote a faith on Wiki. I don't care. I always adhere to WP:NPOV. It is YOU that seem to keep deleting anything Christian. I don't care if you're converted Muslim now living in Indonesia. I really don't care about your religion. Just please don't do disruptive editing and reverting people's edits just because you feel like it. Rantemario (talk) 06:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Well, there shouldn't be anything Christian on Wikipedia, any more than there should be anything capitalist, Islamic or communist. Wikipedia is about facts. I hope we can agree on that. You still need citations to back up changes. Thanks. Davidelit (Talk) 07:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rantemario! Not quite unrelated to the exchange above: I don't know if you have it on your watchlist, but an IP is up to a slow edit war[1] in Buginese people. Maybe you can help out to have an eye on it, because the POV-pushing goes in a similar direction. –Austronesier (talk) 18:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll add that article on my watchlist. Rantemario (talk) 06:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some article expansion help[edit]

Greetings,

It seems you also work on articles related to Indonesia, I was looking for article expansion help at articles like Islamic advice literature, Draft:Aurats (word) an article about historical linguistics and in article several sections are in need of expansion, besides presently those do not have coverage about Indonesian. Please do visit those articles as and when time permits you and pl. do help in article expansions if those topics interest you.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 08:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't have enough knowledge about Islam nor the interest for it to contribute to your said articles. Rantemario (talk) 10:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pembalikan[edit]

Halo, apakah bisa berikan justifikasi kenapa suntingan saya dibalikkan? Saya menyertakan rujukan pada suntingan saya. Wirjadisastra (talk) 16:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Benerin dulu itu formatnya berantakan gak sesuai dengan standar wikipedia. Rantemario (talk) 16:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bisa beritahukan bagian mana yang berantakan dan standar mana yang jadi pedoman Anda sehingga menyatakan suntingan saya berantakan? Wirjadisastra (talk) 16:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bisa lihat sendiri kan dimana typonya di [2] ? coba bandingkan dengan artikel lain sebuah negara misal united kingdom. wikipedia ada standarnya gak boleh suka-suka tulis artikel. Rantemario (talk) 16:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oke. Terima kasih. Typo saya betulkan. Wirjadisastra (talk) 16:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recognised national languages itu kok ada bahasa indonesia ? Rantemario (talk) 17:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Preview dulu lah, double check, jangan langsung save. Rantemario (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bahasa Indonesia kan memang bahasa nasional. Btw, kamu bisa bantu betulkan loh kalau ada yang salah alih-alih main revert. Wirjadisastra (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aish, coba kau lihat infobox negara UK itu format infobox yg benar. jangan sampai kamu dibanned karena dianggap vandal karena dianggap ngerecoki atau berantakin artikel wiki. Rantemario (talk) 17:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Benar versimu itu bagaimana? Coba edit lah biar aku tahu. Wirjadisastra (talk) 17:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesian province motto[edit]

May I know why you are removing the transcription of the provinces' motto without giving an explanation? For now I'll put it back until you can give a reasonable explanation. Thank you. Cal1407 (talk) 06:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portuguese Indonesians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Betawi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional content[edit]

Hello, I'm Davidelit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jakarta have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Davidelit (Talk) 07:09, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK sorry. Rantemario (talk) 10:56, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnotes and see alsos[edit]

You have restored several hatnotes which purport to distingush Javanese things from Japanese things: [3]language, script, and people.

Keep in mind the purpose of hatnotes:

Mention other topics and articles only if there is a reasonable possibility of a reader arriving at the article either by mistake or with another topic in mind. [my emphasis]

It is not clear to me what scenario you have in mind -- perhaps that someone types "Javanese" into a search engine when they intended to type "Japanese"? That seems farfetched. Just because they're distinguished by a single letter doesn't mean that it's a common error.

Beyond that, you've also restored a See Also link on Indonesia-Japan relations to the Japanese people article. But the Indonesia-Japan relations article is about states, not about individuals. That change was reverted by another editor, and I hope you'll accept that as consensus.

I don't know your motivations, but all this certainly smells like spam -- trying to increase the visibility of Java-related articles by linking to them from Japan-related articles. --Macrakis (talk) 20:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

it is YOU what is your problem. that disambiguation links to avoid people confusing javanese and Japanese have been there since forever. why did u suddenly remove them all ? you don't need to know my motivation, just so u know that I am a proud native Indonesian. no offence, but u are not even Japanese nor javanese. you're greek. Rantemario (talk) 01:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's keep the discussion about the issue, not about personalities. How long those dab links have been there is irrelevant. The question is whether they're useful to our readers. The fact that you are a "proud native Indonesian" isn't relevant either.

So, to get back to the question, what evidence do you have that Javanese and Japanese are commonly confused? --Macrakis (talk) 15:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's been two weeks now, and you've presented no evidence that Japanese and Javanese are commonly confused. --Macrakis (talk) 20:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari[edit]

I invite you to please join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari.

Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects.

I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you.

Thank your for the work that you do on Wiki[mp]edia! Peaceray (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please remain civil[edit]

Hi Rantemario! By now you might know that I appreciate your passion about topics that are of concern for you, but frankly, this edit summary[4] of yours went too far. It was quite rude and inappropriate. We have a consensus in WT:INDONESIA about script cruft, and Ibrahim Muizzuddin simply applied this rationale to various province articles regardless of which kind of script, thus also including Arabic-derived Jawi[5]. So please don't make such hasty conclusions about other editors "motives" (as in this case, apparently, just because they have a Muslim user name). Austronesier (talk) 21:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry lol. Rantemario (talk) 01:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]