User talk:Ranze/2012

Hello, Ranze, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Muscle soreness

Re: your question on my talk page, I'd also be cautious of the claim that concentric exercise causes no muscle soreness, but personally, I don't know either way. I've heard people say anecdotally that avoiding eccentric contractions during exercise results in much less or no soreness...but this seems a potentially terrible thing to do to your body, and I think most people do both types of contractions together when they exercise, and personally, I've erred on the side of more eccentric exercise because it leads to greater control, less risk of injury, and also is good for repairing damaged tendons. If you've scoured other sources and can't find it, I'd definitely support you in removing that fact from the page, or perhaps mention that a specific person claims it true, unless others back it as well. Cazort (talk) 18:36, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Gemini Gymnastics

Thanks for creating Gemini Gymnastics, Ranze!

Wikipedia editor Ironholds has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:

Hey; this article doesn't have any footnotes (it's not clear which reference is for which bit of information). Other than that, it looks great, though - let me know if you need any help fixing the issue!

The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on Ironholds's talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the the Teahouse.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for the speedy reply :). So, notability is the initial burden articles face, and sources are totally the way to prove that. However, the reason we have a notability policy is that a core principle of Wikipedia is that our information be verifiable - a reader can look at a statement and be able to say "I can tell where this came from, because the source is linked". So we really do need to format the ones you used information from as inline links :(. I appreciate it may be hard to identify which bits are sourced from where - it might take a bit of time - but it should be possible if you know how to format inline citations. If you do, I'm happy to help with trawling through the references finding citations for each bit of the article. If you don't, I'm happy to teach you as well :). Regards, Ironholds (talk) 14:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Cool :). Okay, so I'll make the necessary changes and you can see how I do it. There's also a really great tutorial on referencing at Help:Introduction to referencing which I really do recommend - it makes the practise very easy to pick up (and makes me slightly annoyed that it didn't exist when I joined way back when ;p.) Ironholds (talk) 00:01, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Okay - done! Let me know if you know of any more sources you want me to include (or want to include yourself) :). Ironholds (talk) 00:12, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monogatari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perrine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mars Society (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Washington

Sex in space (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Logan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lun Lun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lunlun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Troll doll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeffrey Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Intact dilation and extraction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dilation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

A bold and proper edit

I tip my virtual hat. Please call on me for assistance if, as I suspect, this edit meets with resistance or incivility.

Happy editing! David in DC (talk) 14:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dubay v. Wells, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fourteenth Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of C Punk

The article C Punk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page with only 2 links

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Passengerpigeon (talk) 00:48, 24 December 2012 (UTC)