User talk:Rausch

Welcome!

Hello, Rausch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sławomir Biały (talk) 04:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ivan Vahylevych[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ivan Vahylevych requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim Song (talk) 15:43, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thread at WT:WPM[edit]

I have started a thread at WT:WPM regarding the undiscussed move of Category:Differential geometry to Category:Differential geometry and topology. I disagree with this action. Please comment. Le Docteur (talk) 18:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The term Differential geometry and topology is more widespread and more precise. Most of mathematicians think so. Gvozdet (talk) 08:35, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Why are there separate AMS classifications for the two subjects? The fact is that while there is substantial overlap, they are not the same thing and should be distinguished. Also, there is consensus at WT:WPM to undo your massive and undiscussed changes. Le Docteur (talk) 12:07, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not your claim is true is one thing, but you've made major changes without discussion. Moreover, you're being rather insensitive to the nature of your changes. Many of the topics you've modified have essentially no connection to differential topology or differential geometry, other than your contentious assertion. Rybu (talk) 00:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a whole procedure for renaming categories this way, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. If and when such a change is agreed you can ask for a bot to do all the work. These sort of changes need discussion beforehand because they are liable to cause trouble. Dmcq (talk) 13:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to guess when a category rename will end up being "controversial". Let's discuss this matter here at the math project talk page. Several people have objections to the rename, which you may want to address. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I too am hoping that you will come discuss this at WT:WPM. I don't understand why you would want to merge the two categories. I think they are different subjects, but you might have a good reason to merge the categories that I haven't thought of. I'd like to hear what you think. Ozob (talk) 16:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Differential geometry and topology[edit]

I have nominated Category:Differential geometry and topology (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ben (talk) 08:45, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rus[edit]

Can you explain this revert? --Illythr (talk) 22:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

I do not understand some idea : [1]. As such, Legendre polynomials can be generalized (In what way?) to express the symmetries of semi-simple Lie groups (not SO(3)?) and Riemannian symmetric spaces. (not euclidean ?) Can you explain me it? Thank you very much. Gvozdet (talk) 21:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should post this question to Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics. I think I've done some edits on that article, but the particular assertion you quote probably goes beyond what I know about the subject. Michael Hardy (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to this question on my talk page here: Talk:Associated_Legendre_polynomials#Generalizations linas (talk) 21:35, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zero mass particles[edit]

Hi, I replied to your question on my talk page. Basically, there is no such thing as a "classical zero mass particle", and to talk about photons, one must first perform quantization. The lagrangians you wrote are correct, but they are not for photons. linas (talk) 20:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And, yes, Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics is probably a better place for such questions. linas (talk) 20:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Gvozdet (talk) 09:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Russian[edit]

To prevent any further edit warring at WP:IPA for Russian, I suggest you take a look at the information at Russian phonology. The reason we are using the retroflex symbol for Russian instead of the palatoalveolar one has to do with electropalatographic studies by Jerzy Rubach. Of course, it's still common (I suspect for typographic reasons) for sources to use ʒ or ž for this symbol. If you'd like to discuss changing the conventions, I think Wikipedia talk:IPA for Russian would be a good place for that. — Æµ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi]} 03:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Navigation[edit]

Hallo Rausch, When you create an article like Vambi, mentioning and bolding alternative names, please remember to provide access from those names. I've made a redirect from Kissumbo and added an entry to the disambiguation page at Ubo. It not only helps readers to find your article if it's what they need, but also reduces the likelihood of a future editor carelessly creating a duplicate article at a different name. Thanks. PamD 11:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]