User talk:Rawwbots

Welcome![edit]

Hi Rawwbots! I noticed your contributions to Bird (transportation company) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! POLITANVM ^talk 13:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Hello Rawwbots! Your additions to Pruning (artificial neural network) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. (from this journal article https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/014311699211796) Thank you. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 06:45, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rawwbots! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Legal technology that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Greyjoy^talk 10:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning. In the short time you've been on Wikipedia, you have not made any constructive edits. You appear to be using Wikipedia as a platform to express your opinions, either on Talk pages or, worse, in the articles themselves. If you persist, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Final warning. Thanks for the thumbs up Bbb23 .It seems you had rather use your time to poke nose in others business than doing something constructive. This ain't a place to post your threats.

You now are making disruptive edits in a different way, principally by adding or changing material without sources. You are also using embedded links in the prose of the article, which is not permissible. You are introducing factual errors. You are misusing the Prod template in your quest to eliminate articles from Wikipedia but not using the normal deletion processes to do so. A reasonable response to these comments would be helpful; another snarky one would not be, unless of course you don't care if you're blocked for this behavior.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are requested to cite here the actuals with reference, and those which you claim to be altered without reference. I had look into it and post my observations. Any and all of these edits are done with thorough investigation of this subject. Once again, i request that you be courteous enough not to make threats of being banned. I had be more than willing to take the time and effort to escalate the subject. Rawwbots (talk) 14:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With the exception of one edit that was reverted as unsourced by another user, I reverted most of your edits of May 20 with detailed edit summaries. Look at them, and if you have questions, let me know. And please learn how to WP:INDENT in discussions like this one.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:45, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Lil Nas X shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 17:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Bellomini[edit]

You added a picture of Bellomini to the article. You claimed that the picture was your own work and taken 50 years ago. It's rather amazing that you kept such a picture. Where were you (and Bellomini) when you took it?--Bbb23 (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since i was unfairly never given the opportunity to meet in person and seek his consent, and as i believe every Wikipedia user has his fair right to see who actually Bellomini is, i thought it's best not to telegram him. --Rawwbots (talk) 16:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have marked the image as a copyright violation. While U.S. Government works are public domain, Pennsylvania state works are not. We'd all like to be able to use whatever images we like, but reality calls, and copyright is a thing. Uses x (talk • contribs) 17:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Uses x. Rawwbots, continuing to behave like a jerk will not increase your longevity as a Wikipedia editor. You may think it's cute, but it's not.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ThanksUses x, i will upload that again. We all know who's the jerk here Bbb23. I assume many will be in agreement that Drmies's nomination indeed was a terrible mistake and which will be dealt with soon. Surprisingly, my job seems to get easier every time you log in!!!!