User talk:RayAYang/Archive 10
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It's an old offer, but please?
Hi
I noticed on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:General_average/New_version that you offered to help do a merge of that article into the original?
It pains me to see an attempted subpage in the mainspace, but I was wondering if you thought about doing a bit of a basic merge? If you're not willing to, then please do let me know, then I can better plan around stuff.
Thanks in advance
[stwalkerster|talk] 23:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Removal of 'onesource' template
I've just been looking at Ralph Greatorex, and I noticed that you removed the onesource tag with the edit summary 'given the great age, unlikely that other sources will be easy to find, that makes this tag more defacing than helpful'. I've just been looking at the ODNB article, and an updated article on Ralph Greatorex was written for the 2004 edition, and further updated in May 2005 and January 2008 (the latest version). Do you think you could check the current edition of the ODNB before assuming that other sources are not available, or that the 1900 ODNB entry hasn't been updated? Carcharoth (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Quite honestly, I don't recall what I checked, given that this was about 2 months back. RayTalk 01:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Addition to listing for Business for Peace Foundation
Hello, I saw your comments at The Business for Peace Foundation and do not agree that it reads like an advertisement or is unverifiable. Please advice how we can resolve this. The foundation is a non-profit, significantly involved in helping transform business towards a more ethical and responsible behavior, it is supported by Nobel winners in economics and peace and is self-financed. Get in touch through my talk page, if you wish.
SteinL (talk) 10:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Harold Lewis
Nina Lewis, Hal's daughter, sent an announcement to all of his friends on May 26 regarding his passing that morning. What do you want, a newspaper article? I see the author of the changes to the text was "Ninamagic" so I have to wonder if that was his daughter Nina. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.250.10 (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, my apologies, but it has to be a newspaper article, or an announcement from an official source, such as a university webpage. We've had a significant number of pranksters and vandals prematurely announcing people's deaths and other things before, and we have to be wary. Unfortunately, there really isn't an easy way to distinguish people on the internet. Best, RayTalk 05:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
This is Roger Lewis, the son of Harold Lewis. I also confirm the death of my father, as was communicated by my sister Nina. I also note that the book on Fuzzy Logic mentioned wasn't actually written by my dad--just check the author information on Amazon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.112.119.60 (talk) 07:17, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, I've checked the author information as you suggested, and restored that part of it. As for the other, the problems I've described previously still hold. I have posted a request at our noticeboard for such matters to see if anybody else can find a source. Best, RayTalk 06:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Ray - I saw your note on the BLP noticeboard, and found a reference for the date of Professor Lewis' death in the university newsletter. I've added this to the article, and hope it's alright. --Kateshortforbob talk 15:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Cathie Taylor
Did you even read the article? It says she won an Academy of Country Music award, which is a valid assertation of notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 00:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Css-logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Css-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello RayAYang! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
You may be interested in this. Peter jackson (talk) 11:20, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Dispute resolution survey
 Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello RayAYang. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Happer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Energy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
| Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
|---|---|
 |
Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 04:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
Kissinger on Latin America
Thanks for your comment on the Latin America section. I added the following:
Hi, Ray, thanks, I agree this section is overly long and should be condensed to accurately describe Kissinger's role. This time of period is quite important, perhaps less so than most Americans realize as it is an example of an American supported coup, led to 1000's of deaths (indirectly) under a dictatorial regime, and state-sponsored terrorism that we (the U.S.) provided some support for. It led to the first US car-bombing in Washington, D.C., and the murder of multiple American citizens.
I could condense it easily to a paragraph or two, but then TheTimesAreAChanging would object that it is inaccurate, when I am actually allowing him to present his view of events, even though it is overly positive with regards to what really happened. What should I do in this situation?
to the talk page there.
PS I don't understand responding by Talk Pages: should I respond on the subject talk page, the user talk page, both; or are they linked somehow? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veritas Aeterna (talk • contribs) 18:14, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Veritas, the best place to discuss this is on the talk page of the article proper. I will respond there. Best, RayTalk 20:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Resolving Disputes
Hi, Ray,
What should I do with regards to the Henry Kissinger section dispute I am having with TheTimesAreAChanging? He continues to undo my edits despite my request that he wait until our dispute is appealed. He does not seem to be participating in our Talk Page discussion on the article. What happens next?
Thanks,
Veritas Aeterna (talk) 08:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
PS I am also unfamiliar w resolving disputes so don't know if this is the right way. Is there a way I can appeal to a wider jury? Further, if there is a decision, how is it enforced? It seems TheTimesAreAChanging will just continue to change my edits if there is no enforcement.
- I reverted you once, about something that was never discussed and for which you had no consensus. You edit warred to get it back in without discussion, and I acquiesced. That you are a POV-pusher, with a tendency towards hyperbole, should be obvious to any neutral observer. Hopefully, Ray will explain more calmly and politely than I that we really do not need to keep adding vastly more content to the article, as you just did, but instead that it should be cut and summarized with fewer quotations.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- I do indeed hope Ray will be more calm and polite. You've reverted me many times, despite the evidence, and so I've had to appeal our dispute. I've added changes to update the history of the section, and to provide more balance. The original discussion was overly exculpatory of Kissinger's actions, and based on dated sources. I have kept most of TheTimesAreAChanging original material in, to preserve that point of view, ignoring his personal rudeness, dismissive remarks, and personal attacks. I would say the POV pushing is on the other side and the evidence is clear. If the judgement is against what is indeed the truth, I will accept it, and it will be a pity that this Wikipedia article will remain as inaccurate as it was originally, but so be it. Yes, the article can be written so much more clearly than it is now, and with a much better representation of the truth, but then it will not preserve TheTimesAreAChanging's source material that tends to minimize Kissinger's role in the coup based on outdated (e.g., the Church Report, when not amended to account for subsequent revelations from the declassified documents from the Chile Declassification Project, including reports that show where the committee was deceived or evidence was withheld), or self-serving sources (e.g., Kissinger's memoir, which not surprisingly would place him in a better light than others might).
- Veritas Aeterna (talk) 08:50, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi All, I am currently travelling outside the country and rather busy. I will comment when I return. All the best, RayTalk 02:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
RfA: thank you for your support
Ray, thank your for your support and constructive criticism during my recent RfA. I will do my best to treat it as a "learning experience" in my future editing. Warm regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and thanks for tagging this for notability back in 2008. The tag's still there and you may want to read over WP:Notability (schools) and WP:NOTABILITY and add the reasons for your concern to the Talk pg. Alternatively, you could take it to the Notability Noticeboard or AfD, or remove the tag if you are no longer concerned. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Boleyn, a cursory google search not providing in-depth reviews to establish independent notability of this album, I've just gone ahead and redirected it to the artist. It can't be that important if nobody's bothered to improve it for that long. RayTalk 16:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for tagging this for notability. 4 years later, it's unresolved. If you still think it doesn't meet WP:NALBUMS, you may want to make it a redirect to the artist, or take it to WP:N/N or AfD. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Boleyn, thanks, have redirected it to the music group. This is my usual habit when these things come up these days. Best, RayTalk 18:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Jussychoulex has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Nice work on the entries on Sergio Campanato and Morrey–Campanato spaces
Hi, Ray. this is an appreciation of your work on the entries listed in this section title. Also, I would apologize not having answered earlier (I should answered you perhaps 4 years ago!!! :D ) to your kind message about my work on the Signorini problem entry: I had a bad time then, but this is no excuse for villainy. All the best, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 18:35, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Daniele, thanks very much for your kind words. You do a lot of good work on Wikipedia, and I'm glad you're still at it. Best, RayTalk 18:02, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure which is expected to close in a little over a week. If you have received this message, it is because it appears that you participated in the 2009 AC RfC, and your contributions indicate that you are currently active on Wikipedia. Ncmvocalist (talk) 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Holiday cheer
|
Holiday Cheer | |
| Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be a newbie, a good friend, someone you have had disagreements with in the past, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS |
Article Feedback deployment
Hey RayAYang; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
changes to marc hauser's page
ray, i edited the opening lines of my bio as the misconduct issue doesn't belong there. i have not removed or edited the misconduct section because that does belong there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdhauser (talk • contribs) 21:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, please respond at the talk page for the article; I'll respond there. RayTalk 21:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Zygmunt Vetulani
In this case I refered to professor's CV, but as many people may find it not insufficient source (and they're right), I added a reference to Polish President's official website. Francesco 13 (talk) 17:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Edits to Scott Gration
Hi: Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate your guidance as I learn the ropes. Re: copyright -- thank you for the guidance on text from press sources. Re neutrality: I am sensitive to maintaining NPOV, which is why I have only cited the views / opinions of others and not my own in all of my edits, have sought to ensure all all viewpoints expressed in referenced articles are reflected, and have improved references / removed only text that is not properly sourced / referenced. Please remember that sharing other's favorable views on the subject does not necessarily constitute bias toward the subject, just as including unfavorable views on the subject does not necessarily indicate bias against. All of my contributions are sourced and express the public views of sources available in the public domain, as consistent with the COI policy.
Please let me know where / how I should be disclosing any conflict of interest. In the edit summary? Elsewhere?
Thank you, Jpl24 (talk) 16:30, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, you're doing great. The edit summary was a good place to disclose conflicts of interest. Best of luck with continuing editing. RayTalk 03:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Notability of Japanese ambassadors
In the context established by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susumu Shibata, may I ask you to to take a look at two related articles. I wonder how to measure consensus opinion about Tsukasa Kawada and List of Ambassadors from Japan to Algeria? --Ansei (talk) 17:28, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for mentioning these to me. I am waiting for the RFC to close, and then we may take action on these articles depending on the result. RayTalk 20:56, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
zeteo
Hi Ray, first of all I apologize for being so embarassingly slow in responding to your kind messages. The site is down because the provider temporarily shut it down because of mal-organized database queries. I have posted a message here, please comment there if you like. Thanks, Jakob.scholbach (talk) 04:51, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
An article on Osamu Hirota, Tamagawa University
Since you are from japan, I have left a message of the above title in the japanese wikipedia page of Help for Non-Japanese Speakers. Will you be kind to check it. Solomon7968 (talk) 13:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- I am not Japanese, to put it mildly. RayTalk 19:02, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- OOps Solomon7968 (talk) 13:25, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Arbitration
I mentioned you.[1]
Dear0Dear 22:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Eliane Plewman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Eliane Plewman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Alberto Calderon.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Alberto Calderon.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
William J. Luti
Ray, your name is all over Bill Luti's page except where it counts - accurate biographical data. There is a ton of material on Luti on the web from a complete biography to a host of press articles; most having to do with his involvement in justifying the 2nd Iraq war by manipulating "intelligence" to conform to his (and his bosses') point of view. That unjustified (by the facts) war cost thousands of lives, yet Luti's Wiki page has but one source referenced and no mention of this singular seminal event in his life. By the way, without that event, Luti's name would be largely unknown and he certainly wouldn't have a Wiki page. FYI, I would fix it myself but I went to college, graduated, and served in the Navy with him, and I don't feel it would be "fair" for me to author an accurate piece. CarlitosCorazon 09:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharleyHart (talk • contribs)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Patrick Hastings.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Patrick Hastings.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Inactive peer review volunteer
Hi RayAYang, you're receiving this message because you were previously listed at the list of volunteers for Wikipedia's peer review process, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the volunteers list, so that the list is kept up to date and editors who do need help can better find active editors. If you become active again and would like to add yourself to the volunteers list again, you can do so at any time by visiting the volunteers list.
Thank you for volunteering to be on the list previously, and all the best on your WikiVoyages! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:02, 12 April 2021 (UTC)