User talk:Raymm

Welcome!

Hello, Raymm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Phoenixrod 23:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse Me...[edit]

Hello Raymm,

Yesterday (April 28) you wrote: "Quote"Responded to your comment re my comment on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusion, hoping for further conversation.--Raymm 23:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)"Unquote"

On my talk page. But after carefully reviewing my contributions, the page's history and the talk page history I never edited this page! Please explain why you left the message you did on my talk page?

Booksworm Talk to me! 11:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages vs. forum[edit]

Hi. Regarding my "This is not a forum" comment, please read the Wikipedia talk page guide lines about the purpose of talk pages. Take a careful look at the subsections "Keep on topic" and "Stay objective" under the "How to use article talk pages" section. You need to discuss about material that will improve the related article. If the discussion is general (ie. a simple query about a specific event in the show), then it's not the right place.

And BTW, I'm not the one who completely removed the section. ThuranX did. But anyway, welcome to Wikipedia! :) -- Lyverbe 21:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's better to answer on the page of the person you're in contact with. Add a ":" before each reply to indent it. -- Lyverbe 01:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

Here's how you do it...

[[User:Raymm|''' Raymm ''']][[User talk:Raymm| talk ]]

which will look like...

Raymm talk

Just make changes to your own specifications and there you have it. I stuck it in a dedicated page ( User:Anticrash/Sig) and when i wanna link to it I use {{:User:Anticrash/Sig}} and add ~~~~~ and it shows up as...

Anticrash talk 01:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you very much. How do you figure out/learn that stuff?--Raymm 00:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Heroes[edit]

YOur section is a forum posting, not a discussion of how to improve the article or incorporate new information. It's hypothesizing facts about the future plot of the show. despite that, someone was nice enough to answer it for you. Peter was seen exploding in his dreams, and in numerous other ways. You asked how he could Survive the blast, and we've seen Sprague survive plenty of blasts. Factor in that peter can heal like claire, and there you go. beyond that, you need to watch the show. Wikipedia is NOT a forum for the hypotheses of the fans. (th Wonders is more appropriate , or the NBC.com forum. Do NOT re-add the forumlike section. Thank you.ThuranX 02:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, I do watch the show, and I have not seen anything conclusive that shows that the explosion is Peter exploding and not a bomb behind him exploding. I honestly think an assumption is being made by viewers/readers/editors that doesn't have support. My comments are intended to improve the article. If there is info that conclusively establishes Peter's body itself explodes, I think it would improve the article. It certainly would improve it for me, as I haven't seen anything that establishes what I believe is an unsupported assumption.

Also, both Peter and Claire have not come back to life while a glass/tree branch remained in their body, only regaining life when it was pulled out. And, as far as I know, neither has healed after having a limb torn off. Claire' video included broken bones, but her body remained intact.

Anyway, far be it from me to upset the community by asking a fair question.--Raymm 00:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, emphasising I'm not trying to fight, I'm just trying to learn, at Editing Comments - Others Comments I see this:

  *In general, editing others' comments is not allowed. Exceptions are:
  * If you have their permission
  * Removing prohibited material such as libel and personal details
  * Removing personal attacks and incivility. Please read WP:ATTACK#Removal of text and WP:CIVIL#Removing uncivil comments before removing anything.
  * Unsigned comments: You are allowed to append —The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]). or one of its variants to the end of someone's comment if they have failed to sign it. The form is —The preceding unsigned comment was added by USER NAME OR IP (talk • contribs)., which results in —The preceding unsigned comment was added by USER NAME OR IP (talk • contribs) ..
  * Interruptions: In some cases, it is OK to interrupt a long contribution, either by a short comment (as a reply to a minor point) or by a headline (If the contribution introduces a new topic. In that case, add "Headline added to (reason) by Raymm 20:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)"). In such cases, please add —This is part of a comment by USER NAME OR IP , which got interrupted by the following:  before the interruption.
  * When a long comment has formatting errors, rendering it difficult to read. In this case, restrict the edits to formatting changes only and preserve the content as much as possible.
  * On your own user talk page, you may remove comments from others, although archiving is generally preferred. The text of another user's comment, however, may never be directly edited to misrepresent the person or change the meaning of the comment.

I'd be grateful if you could explain under which exception you judged that you could delete my comment--Raymm 01:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree that deleting the entire section was disrespectful. -- Lyverbe 11:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support Lyverbe.--Raymm 21:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption[edit]

If you're interested checkout my user page and my talk page to see if you'd like to be adopted.Sam ov the blue sand 00:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your page shows a lot of style. Yes, I would be grateful to be adopted.

As a first question, can you tell me if I'm using the Edit Summary the right way?

Template space[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your contributions, but the Ontario Partition Act template you've made is not exactly the sort of use template space is meant for. I've substituted the template into the article, and intend to delete the template itself unless you have an objection, in which case I will nominate it through the formal deletion process. Templates are for collections of links that connect different articles (like the property law template on the Partition (law) page, which lays out all the key concepts of property law. Cheers! bd2412 T 20:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, hearing no objection I've gone ahead and deleted both templates. You are more than welcome to add the info to the partition article, of course. It's just not the sort of thing that would go in template space. bd2412 T 00:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]