User talk:Rdmpage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Rdmpage! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost[edit]

Hi, I have added a short note about your "encyclopedia of life" paper to this week's issue of the Signpost (the English Wikipedia's community-edited newspaper): Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-07-19/In the news#Briefly. As a non-biologist, I hope that I haven't introduced any errors, and that the side remark about Wikispecies isn't too misguided.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 23:49, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks very much for doing this, you've done a nice job summarising the paper. I still don't know quite what to make of Wikispecies, which is one reason I didn't discuss it in the paper. But I hope to meet up with one of it's most active contributors in the next week or so to talk about the relationship between Wikipedia and Wikispecies. Roderic D. M. Page (talk) 03:18, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And another (brief) one in this week's issue. To be honest, I didn't quite understand the precise meaning of the number 53,000; I hope the wording in the Signpost article is sufficiently vage to be correct ;)
Regards, HaeB (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Catalogue of Life (DVD cover).jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Catalogue of Life (DVD cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaurav mockup.png missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:47, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused: The BIOOne page says that volume 108 (!) was published in 2000, meaning that volume 1 was published in 1893 or earlier. The two societies merged. It looks to me that there are not two journals but just one. Perhaps you can have another look at the sources. --Randykitty (talk) 13:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's confusing I agree, and that's one reason why I created these pages. There are two quite distinct journals with different publishers. The current Entomological Americana is the successor to the Journal of the New York Entomological Society (which ended with volume 107). So, the Society renamed their journal using the name of a journal published by the society they joined with. Why they'd choose to do this is anyone's guess. But the two journals are quite distinct. Hope this helps. See also http://www.nyentsoc.org/#!publications/drci2
    • Well, if this is the case, than the article on the current EA should be adapted to state that it was established many years ago and had a different title, until it merged with the other EA and adopted that journal's name. It might be least confusing to merge the two articles (there's not that much to say about either journal anyway) and explain this history clearly. BTW, see WP:JWG for helpful tips on writing journal articles. --Randykitty (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks for the feedback. Just to clarify, the two EA journals NEVER merged, the publishing societies merged, then some time later one adopted the name EA for its journal. When I've time I can flesh these details out. Merging the articles won't help distinguish between these two journals, which is my goal. By way of background, I spend a lot of time locating articles that describe new species my BioStor and BioNames projects and it took me some time to realise that the two EA journals were quite different.--Roderic D. M. Page (talk) 06:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • Well, as you see from my comments above, you need to do a better job of explaining the differences... :-) The way I interpret all this is: there were two societies, each with its own journal. At some point, the societies merged (or one absorbed the other) and one journal was discontinued and merged into the other journal, which took its title. Meaning we should have one article on them, to adequately explain this and prevent confusion. --Randykitty (talk) 11:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
          • It's even more complicated than that, I'm working on a timeline to show the different journals and societies involved. --Roderic D. M. Page (talk) 12:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
          • Please don't delete a page I'm working on! --Roderic D. M. Page (talk) 12:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Table[edit]

Year Brooklyn Entomological Society New York Entomological Club New York Entomological Society
1878 Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society (ISSN 1051-8932) volume 1
1881 Papilio (ISSN 0196-5832) volume 1
1884 Ceases publication with volume 4
1885 Ceases publication with volume 7
1885 Entomologica Americana (ISSN 0096-3712) volume 1 (formed from Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society and Papilio)
1912 Suspends publication with volume 6
1893 Journal of the New York Entomological Society (ISSN 0028-7199) volume 1
1912 Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society (new series) resumes with volume 8
1926 Entomologica Americana (new series) resumes publication with volume 7
1965 Ceases publication with volume 59-60 in 1965
1975 Ceases publication with volume 49
2006 Ceases publication with volume 114
2009-present Entomologica Americana (ISSN 1947-5136) volume 115 onwards

Orphaned non-free image File:Journal of the New York Entomological Society cover art.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Journal of the New York Entomological Society cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Catalogue of Life (DVD cover).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Catalogue of Life (DVD cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jurors for WikiScienceCompetition 2017[edit]

Hi, I see from this query that you are wikimedian working in the academia.

I am helping to organize the Wiki Science Competition. As a New Zealand citizen working in UK you would represent two countries without national jury. Would you like to join as a juror? We are thinking of adding two additional main jurors, you could be one of them.

We start in few weeks, but international jurors work later, from January 2018.

In any case I hope you can spread the news. Let me know.--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexmar983, yes, I'd be happy to serve on the jury. --Roderic D. M. Page (talk) 09:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Can you tell me your best email? I inform Ivo from Wikimedia Estonia! I feel really lucky, it is great that you can accept so fast, really--Alexmar983 (talk) 09:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]
The best email address is [remove just in case for the spam] --Roderic D. M. Page (talk) 09:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ok!--Alexmar983 (talk) 09:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prof. Page, many finalists are declared in these days, so the work of the final jurors is going to start in circa four weeks. I am verifying that they are all available as planned. You will use the tool Montage to trim and rank the national finalists, please take a look to this page when you have time.--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:13, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexmar983, yes, still happy to do this. --Roderic D. M. Page (talk) 09:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
ok I'll inform you when we are close. Next week at least two countries with juries will reveal their finalists.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you please reply to my mail of last week? The voting has started on montage. You are one of the missing juror to vote.--Alexmar983 (talk) 19:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexmar983 I've done my voting now, sorry for any delay.
No problem, we still miss few jurors. I'll send another email with another category of images in few days, or even tomorrow. Thank you for voting.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:34, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to bother, but I remind you to cast votes for some of the campaign on Montage.--Alexmar983 (talk) 04:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please vote? It won't take you too much time.--Alexmar983 (talk) 01:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cite Q[edit]

Jeffrey T. Williams; Kent E. Carpenter; James L. Van Tassell; Paul Hoetjes; Wes Toller; Peter Etnoyer; Michael Smith (21 May 2010). "Biodiversity Assessment of the Fishes of Saba Bank Atoll, Netherlands Antilles". PLOS One. 5 (5). Bibcode:2010PLoSO...510676W. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0010676. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 2873961. PMID 20505760. Wikidata Q15625490.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

Б. А. КОРОТЯЕВ (2018). "ДВА НОВЫХ ВИДА ДОЛГОНОСИКОВ РОДА MECYSMODERES SCHOENHERR, 1837 (COLEOPTERA, CURCULIONIDAE: CEUTORHYNCHINAE) ИЗ ВЬЕТНАМА". Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie (in Russian). 97 (3): 473–482. doi:10.1134/S0367144518030115. ISSN 0367-1445. Wikidata Q99838137.

赵修复 (May 1993). "In Memory of the Late Prof. Maa Tsing-Chao (T.C.Maa), the Pioneering Explorer of Fujian Insect Fauna". Wuyi Science Journal (in Chinese). 10: 1–3. ISSN 1001-4276. Wikidata Q89665527.

Conrad L Schoch; Barbara Robbertse; Vincent Robert; et al. (30 June 2014). "Finding needles in haystacks: linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for Fungi". Database. 2014 (0): bau061–bau061. doi:10.1093/DATABASE/BAU061. ISSN 1758-0463. PMC 4075928. PMID 24980130. Wikidata Q30582014.

A B Kury; A Pérez G (31 December 2002). "A new family of Laniatores from northwestern South America (Arachnida, Opiliones)" (PDF). Revista Ibérica de Aracnología. 6: 3–11. ISSN 1576-9518. Wikidata Q93091690. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 August 2020.

Richard C Wilkerson; Yvonne-Marie Linton; Dina M Fonseca; Ted R Schultz; Dana C Price; Daniel A Strickman (2015). "Making Mosquito Taxonomy Useful: A Stable Classification of Tribe Aedini that Balances Utility with Current Knowledge of Evolutionary Relationships". PLOS One. 10 (7): e0133602. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1033602W. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0133602. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4520491. PMID 26226613. Wikidata Q21003923.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

B. A. Korotyaev (October 2018). "Two New Species of the Weevil Genus Mecysmoderes Schoenherr, 1837 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae: Ceutorhynchinae) from Vietnam" (PDF). Entomological Review. 98 (7): 899–906. doi:10.1134/S0013873818070114. ISSN 0013-8738. Wikidata Q99837830.

Stephen Jackson; Colin Groves (16 June 2015). Taxonomy of Australian Mammals. p. 536. ISBN 978-1-4863-0014-3. Wikidata Q94499626.


Alfred Kaltenbach (December 1980). "Hofrat Professor Dr. Max Beier zum Gedenken" (PDF). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien (in German). 83: 763–781. ISSN 0083-6133. JSTOR 41768843. Wikidata Q47036032.