User talk:RebelHeart23

January 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to When The Horses Are Running And The Dogs Are Silent, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Stickee (talk) 14:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RebelHeart23, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 18:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Multiple Accounts

It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Mike V • Talk 18:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Living for Love. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

"madonnarama.com" is a fansite and therefore is NOT a reliable source. Please don't use that as a reference. Also, don't add unconfirmed rumors to articles. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edit on Upcoming Gwen Stefani studio album

Hello RebelHeart23! I appreciate your recent contribution to the aforementioned page, but with much research, there is no evidence that your edit is trustworthy. If in fact it is trustworthy, please cite your sources. Carbrera (talk) 23:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)