User talk:RedBeansNotRice

March 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Tommi1986. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:Systemic bias without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 18:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Systemic bias, you may be blocked from editing. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 18:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i'm a troll. what can you expect out of me?

no fear, i won't do it again.

though the argument still stands, wikipedia needs more humor. RedBeansNotRice (talk) 18:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the first time was a test edit... RedBeansNotRice (talk) 18:51, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Systemic bias, you may be blocked from editing. Beccaynr (talk) 19:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

wait what did i do RedBeansNotRice (talk) 19:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 19:22, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedBeansNotRice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for my immature and inappropriate behavior on the site. I've recently taken more of an interest in actually building and expanding an encyclopedia; my trolling was unacceptable and I understand that now. I was immature then and hope that I can be forgiven now.

Decline reason:

Nothing here convinces me you aren't a troll. Yamla (talk) 18:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i made ``one joke`` what did i do RedBeansNotRice (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a troll? PhilKnight (talk) 19:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

occasionally comedically and what i call myself? yes

in reality? i do not attempt to be a troll. regardless of what my user page may say. i'm not on wikipedia to troll, i'm here mainly because i have too much free time.

though i will agree that it is suspicious for a new account to be created and be labeled in user profile "a troll." i used to have a wikipedia account three years ago but i forgot what it was called after i lost my email and i've never needed one again; i wasn't active anyways. edit: i do apologize for anything i've done, even unintentionally or as a test edit.RedBeansNotRice (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

edit because i cannot edit: i do apologize for anything i've done, whether intentionally or even as a test edit. RedBeansNotRice (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You called yourself a troll and all you have done is trolling, so "if it walks like a duck...." You are obviously not here to build the encyclopedia. This is not a social media site or chatroom for you to use as a playground. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

fair. i'll not try to argue this with one who was in prison for 19 years (a suitable time for much self-reflection) RedBeansNotRice (talk) 20:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedBeansNotRice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been over a year since I made my mistakes and was blocked; I cannot give proof that I don't wish to troll other than a promise that I won't. I'm sorry for my disruptive behavior, and I fully understand and accept that I was rightly blocked. I do, however, want to do work on Wikipedia - like add articles for games I play and enjoy that currently simply don't exist on the site. RedBeansNotRice (talk) 21:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm skeptical given your outright trolling. Please given an example of an edit that you want to make. Be specific. Type out the exact edit. Don't say something general like "I would fix typos". You can make a new unblock request with your answer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

RedBeansNotRice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This might be a bit of a big thing for me, but the reason I'm asking and being so insistent is because I wanted to create a Wikipedia page for Library of Ruina. Currently it is mentioned in the Lobotomy Corporation game page, but it is a niche game and so doesn't have its own (even though it's a superior game to LobCorp) RedBeansNotRice (talk) 15:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This might be a bit of a big thing for me, but the reason I'm asking and being so insistent is because I wanted to create a Wikipedia page for ''Library of Ruina''. Currently it is mentioned in the Lobotomy Corporation game page, but it is a niche game and so doesn't have its own (even though it's a superior game to LobCorp) [[User:RedBeansNotRice|RedBeansNotRice]] ([[User talk:RedBeansNotRice#top|talk]]) 15:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This might be a bit of a big thing for me, but the reason I'm asking and being so insistent is because I wanted to create a Wikipedia page for ''Library of Ruina''. Currently it is mentioned in the Lobotomy Corporation game page, but it is a niche game and so doesn't have its own (even though it's a superior game to LobCorp) [[User:RedBeansNotRice|RedBeansNotRice]] ([[User talk:RedBeansNotRice#top|talk]]) 15:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This might be a bit of a big thing for me, but the reason I'm asking and being so insistent is because I wanted to create a Wikipedia page for ''Library of Ruina''. Currently it is mentioned in the Lobotomy Corporation game page, but it is a niche game and so doesn't have its own (even though it's a superior game to LobCorp) [[User:RedBeansNotRice|RedBeansNotRice]] ([[User talk:RedBeansNotRice#top|talk]]) 15:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}