User talk:Redmonddeshun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Redmonddeshun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Electriccatfish2 (talk) 00:08, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Redmonddeshun. You have new messages at WP: PERM/C.
Message added 00:08, 11 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Electriccatfish2 (talk) 00:08, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to God Forgives, I Don't does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Dan56 (talk) 04:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Chapter V (Trey Songz album), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 04:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 4 (Beyoncé Knowles album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Never remove such large sections of information, which is perfectly valid. If you have any questions or issues, post it on the talk page of the article. That is what it is there for. AARONTALK 22:48, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 4 (Beyoncé Knowles album) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. GoShow (............................) 22:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Pink Friday. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 03:05, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded[edit]

Please review MOS:ALBUM for information on article structure in WP:ALBUMS. You need to explain large-scale changes using an edit summary when making challengeable edits like your recent changes to Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded. Also, the certification table you attempted to add at Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up is only appropriate when an album achieves multiple certifications, hence the pluralized section title "Certifications"; if in fact it does, such a section shouldnt be bundled with the unrelated charts table (MOS:ALBUM#Charts). Dan56 (talk) 23:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Dan56 (talk) 02:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you have some valid retort to the structure at MOS:ALBUM, then please express it at the article's talk page. Otherwise, promotional aspects should be placed before the reception (chronologically, logically, etc.) in an article body, as they started before the album was received/released. Blindly reverting editors who justified their edits to you is disruptive. Dan56 (talk) 03:04, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]