User talk:RegionalQueenslander

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Here's some lamingtons to welcome you to WikiProject Australia!

G'day RegionalQueenslander, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email help@wikimedia.org.au.

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your userpage.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Article titles
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 11:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Bracey (sports presenter) has been accepted[edit]

James Bracey (sports presenter), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 07:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Singing Ship has been accepted[edit]

Singing Ship, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 11:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Abo (July 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 18:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, RegionalQueenslander! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 18:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ricardo Gonçalves has been accepted[edit]

Ricardo Gonçalves, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 06:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Holt has been accepted[edit]

Josh Holt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Storchy (talk) 10:38, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Joseph Lee has been accepted[edit]

Thomas Joseph Lee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 12:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting content[edit]

Generally, if content is reliably cited and doesn't violate some policy (like copyright or defamation of living people etc), it's generally best not to delete it. It may be that it needs to go into a different section or be given some context. In particular, information that is no longer current (e.g. the closure of the Gladstone Mater Private Hospital) may need to be rewritten in the past tense and/or moved into the history section (or a history section created to contain it). Obviously exactly what is done depends a bit on the structure of the article. I hope this helps. Kerry (talk) 07:35, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Cousins (builder) has been accepted[edit]

Robert Cousins (builder), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:50, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CapriCon (Australia) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, CapriCon (Australia), is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 10:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nate Byrne (October 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roz Kelly (sports journalist) (October 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe O'Brien (journalist) has been accepted[edit]

Joe O'Brien (journalist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 TT me 12:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Brihony Dawson[edit]

On 22 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brihony Dawson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Australian Brihony Dawson debuted as the first non-binary host of reality TV franchise The Challenge, they decided not to imitate the "ominous" style of the U.S. host? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brihony Dawson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brihony Dawson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:CapriCon (Australia)[edit]

Information icon Hello, RegionalQueenslander. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CapriCon (Australia), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Diana Fisher[edit]

On 2 February 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Diana Fisher, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 05:32, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Abo has been accepted[edit]

Sarah Abo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pbritti (talk) 17:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CapriCon (Australia)[edit]

Hello, RegionalQueenslander. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CapriCon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:53, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Jeff Watson (journalist) is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert James Diamond for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert James Diamond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert James Diamond until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 13:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Katherine Bennell-Pegg is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:32, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, RegionalQueenslander. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roz Kelly (sports journalist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Charles Cousens is an excellent article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RegionalQueenslander. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Roz Kelly".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nate Byrne[edit]

Hello, RegionalQueenslander. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nate Byrne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 23:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know[edit]

Hi, I was thinking about nominating Vanessa Hudson for a DYK hook. If you don't know what they are, take a look at the main page. Every day interesting facts appear on the main page with "Did you know" a small fact about an article subject. I was thinking of nominating Hudson for "Did you know Vanessa Hudson is the first female CEO of Qantas Airways in its 103 year history?"

If I nominate, I feel you deserve credit too given you wrote the article. Good work on that btw. If you wish to co-nominate, ill go ahead and process the hook nomination and list you as co-nom. Cheers MaxnaCarta (talk) 23:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Ray Wilkie is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:32, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, RegionalQueenslander. Thank you for your work on William Beak. Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very interesting article, thanks for your contributions!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henry Beak for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henry Beak, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Beak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]