User talk:Renee00124

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Lugia2453 (talk) 03:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bjelleklang - talk 18:20, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly[edit]

Hello Renee00124. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

In December of 2013 I was told that I had 6 month to make corrections and updates to this page or it would be deleted. I edited the page, saved it, but do not see a resubmit button.

Help me with...

Renee00124 (talk) 05:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can resubmit the page by adding the code {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page. I can't see it being accepted in its current state, however; there are no inline citations, far to much trivial information such as track listings, and no decent sources. Yunshui 雲水 07:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly (May 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Renee00124, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Electronic harassment, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am now in warring status with AndyTheGrump. I attempted to incorporate the following info into Wikipedia:

1. The Space Preservation Act of 2001 (HR 2977) by Kucinich detailing this technology exists which you tried to imply was the work of a congressman buying into quackery.

2. The Microwave auditory effect - which is a Wikipedia page and another article of substantiation by Princeton Univ.

3. Congressman Jim Guest's official letter subtantiating "Electronic Weapon Torture"

4. A veterans today link compiled on industry insiders. That reminds me I need to add the CNN report on this technology, Directed Energy Weapons, in 1985. And, a lawsuit brought by a NSA contractor detailing technology you attempt to portray as a Dis Info agent as non existent or the work of mentally ill, highly intelligent and educated individuals

4. Anything after Biological Amplications were approved by the author of "Synthetic Telepathy, Early Mind Wars" by Dr. Richard Alan Miller.

5. And I also have explicit permission by Paul Baird who allow inserting of information of how terms came about which are used today by the psychiatric community to discredit people speaking up about this type of COVERT Electronic Harassment.

I am well versed in this arena with, again books published on the subject. Everything else outside of what I used for reference / excerpts is written my me.

Please advise...

Electronic harassment[edit]

I undid your edit as your links didn't work and citations were not properly formatted so I couldn't understand them. Jim1138 (talk) 04:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please peruse the welcome section below regarding how to edit Wikipedia. Please use your sandbox (at the top between Talk and Preferences) to test edits before using. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 04:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

A cup of warm tea to welcome you!

Hello, Renee00124, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Jim1138 (talk) 04:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic harassment[edit]

If you persist in filling our article on electronic harassment with poorly-sourced POV-pushing tinfoil-hattery, I can guarantee that you will end up being blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not a platform for the propagation of batshit-crazy conspiracy theories... AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:46, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Further to this, I note per the discussion here [1] that content you have been adding has been copy-pasted from elsewhere - almost certainly in breach of copyright. Under no circumstances will Wikipedia permit copyright violations - content (except under very specific circumstances) must be in your own words. AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ATTENTION: Government Dis Info Agent. Flattery will get you no where with me . Copyright laws allow "Free Use" of material related to science and technlogy! Let the games begin!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renee00124 17:10, 20 July 2014‎ (talk • contribs)
Nope. Not even close. If you continue to copy-paste material in violation of copyright, you will undoubtedly find yourself permanently blocked from editing - see Wikipedia:Copyrights. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your joking right! The information you posted is straight from copy and pasted material in your brief article.

I posted credible information exposing your attempt to mislead the public and when someone countered the info, which is what Wikipedia is for, a vicious attack by you stating "bat***":

1. The Space Preservation Act of 2001 (HR 2977) by Kucinich detailing this technology exists which you tried to imply was the work of a congressman buying into quackery.

2. The Microwave auditory effect - which is a Wikipedia page and another article of substantiation by Princeton Univ.

3. Congressman Jim Guest's official letter subtantiating "Electronic Weapon Torture"

4. A veterans today link compiled on industry insiders. That reminds me I need to add the CNN report on this technology, Directed Energy Weapons, in 1985. And, a lawsuit brought by a NSA contractor detailing technology you attempt to portray as a Dis Info agent as non existent or the work of mentally ill, highly intelligent and educated individuals

4. Anything after Biological Amplications were approved by the author of "Synthetic Telepathy, Early Mind Wars" by Dr. Richard Alan Miller.

5. And I also have explicit permission by Paul Baird who allow inserting of information of how terms came about which are used today by the psychiatric community to discredit people speaking up about this type of COVERT Electronic Harassment.

I am well versed in this arena with, again books published on the subject. Everything else outside of what I used for reference / excerpts is written my me.

You KMIR reference and Alan Drucker comments are 100% copy and pasted.

Again, you have been exposed.

Edit warring on electronic harassment[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on electronic harassment. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE FROM Renee00124 - You are wrong, and based on you initial response, you have a personal interest in insuring disinformation. You attack and the level of anger clearly reveals this fact. The only thing pasted were the links used as "Excerpts" which are allowed under "Fair Use" copyright laws. But lets get to the real reason you are attempting use dis info to deny that patented technology, history and laws, and unclassified documents reveal technological Electronic Harassment exist. Let me guess, you are part of the problem and as I have witnessed first hand those usually, government employees working these programs, who are attempting to keep the information outside of the public domain.

I listed the following:

The Space Preservation Act of 2001(HR 2977) Kucinich's which you conveniently left out but decided to mention Congressman Kucinich as if a kook buying to hysteria - credible

Microwave auditory effect - which is also a Wikipedia page

The Frey effect of microwave transmission documented in American Psychologist magazine in 1975 and a Princeton article on Microwave auditory effect

A link to a letter by State Rep Jim Guest officially detailing "Electronic Weapon Torture"

United States Codes and DOD regulations connected to testing of technology approved for riot/crowd control.

DHS Malintent software article by Foxnews.comn used in these testing programs.

A Veterans Today video with highly credible sources within the scientific community knowledge of this technology dating back decades. That reminds me, I also need to include a CNN documentary in 1985 on Directed Energy Weapons

The information beginning at biological amplications has been approved for use by the author of "Synthetic Telepathy and Early Mind Wars" officially.

Again, the summary is in my voice, again, or material approved for use, under "Fair Use" laws as excerpts.

However, lets get to the real reason you showed up pissed off, egotistically, and believing you an authority on this issue and what is an obvious attempt to manage the perception of the public with total disinformation!

Are you familiar with Wikipedia's Creative Commons License related to copyright material: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_license. It appears not or perhaps your intention and interest is in managing public perception may give you a false sense of twisted power while promoting dis info!

July 2014[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Electronic harassment. St★lwart111 10:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Kuru (talk) 14:17, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE FROM Renee00124

1. The Space Preservation Act of 2001 (HR 2977) by Kucinich detailing this technology exists which you tried to imply was the work of a congressman buying into quackery.

2. The Microwave auditory effect - which is a Wikipedia page and another article of substantiation by Princeton Univ.

3. Congressman Jim Guest's official letter subtantiating "Electronic Weapon Torture"

4. A veterans today link compiled on industry insiders. That reminds me I need to add the CNN report on this technology, Directed Energy Weapons, in 1985. And, a lawsuit brought by a NSA contractor detailing technology you attempt to portray as a Dis Info agent as non existent or the work of mentally ill, highly intelligent and educated individuals

4. Anything after Biological Amplications were approved by the author of "Synthetic Telepathy, Early Mind Wars" by Dr. Richard Alan Miller.

5. And I also have explicit permission by Paul Baird who allow inserting of information of how terms came about which are used today by the psychiatric community to discredit people speaking up about this type of COVERT Electronic Harassment.

I am well versed in this arena with, again books published on the subject. Everything else outside of what I used for reference / excerpts is written my me.

Please advise...Renee00124 (talk) 18:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Useful reading[edit]

If you wish to continue to edit Wikipedia, I suggest that rather than waste your time making random assertions as to the motivations of contributors, and random assertions regarding what you think Wikipedia policy is, you familiarise yourself with actual Wikipedia policies and guidelines. You will find the following a good starting point:

Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Wikipedia:Fringe theories
Wikipedia:Copyrights
Wikipedia:Plagiarism
Wikipedia:Edit warring

AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE FROM Renee00124

Disinformation From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For other uses, see Disinformation (disambiguation). Not to be confused with misinformation.

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2010) See also: Denial and deception

Disinformation is intentionally false or inaccurate information that is spread deliberately. It is an act of deception and false statements to convince someone of untruth. Disinformation should not be confused with misinformation, information that is unintentionally false.

Unlike traditional propaganda techniques designed to engage emotional support, disinformation is designed to manipulate the audience at the rational level by either discrediting conflicting information or supporting false conclusions. A common disinformation tactic is to mix some truth and observation with false conclusions and lies, or to reveal part of the truth while presenting it as the whole (a limited hangout).

Another technique of concealing facts, or censorship, is also used if the group can affect such control. When channels of information cannot be completely closed, they can be rendered useless by filling them with disinformation, effectively lowering their signal-to-noise ratio and discrediting the opposition by association with many easily disproved false claims.

Contents 

   1 Examples
       1.1 Napoleonic wars
       1.2 World War II and Cold War
       1.3 Disinformation by the KGB
   2 Media
   3 See also
   4 References
   5 Bibliography
   6 External links

Examples

In espionage or military intelligence, disinformation is the deliberate spreading of false information to mislead an enemy as to one's position or course of action. In politics, disinformation is the deliberate attempt to deflect voter support of an opponent, disseminating false statements of innuendo based on a candidate's vulnerabilities as revealed by opposition research. In both cases, it also includes the distortion of true information in such a way as to render it useless.

Disinformation may include distribution of forged documents, manuscripts, and photographs, or spreading dangerous rumours and fabricated intelligence. Its techniques may also be found in commerce and government, used to try to undermine the position of a competitor.

Napoleonic wars

In early 1799, a French fleet under Vice-admiral Bruix was to depart from Brest, bound for the Mediterranean. In March, the French purchased the chasse-marée Rebecca and in April, they sent her with four swivel guns and seven men, carrying a capitaine de frégate with false dispatches for Ireland and the mission to let herself be captured. Rebecca gave herself up to the hired armed cutter Black Joke on 27 April 1799, luring Admiral Bridport to Ireland, away from the route of the French fleet which successfully sailed south-west into Bruix' expedition of 1799.[1][2] World War II and Cold War

A classic example of disinformation occurred during World War II, preceding the Normandy landings, in what would be known as Operation Fortitude. British intelligence convinced the German Armed Forces that a much larger invasion force was about to cross the English Channel from Kent, England.

In reality, the Normandy landings were the main attempt at establishing a beachhead, made easier by the German Command's reluctance to commit its armies. Another act of World War II–era disinformation was Operation Mincemeat, where British intelligence dressed up a corpse, equipped it with fake invasion plans, and floated it out to sea where Axis troops would eventually recover it.

The Cold War made disinformation a mainstream military and political tactic. Military disinformation techniques were described by Vladimir Volkoff.

Disinformation by the KGB

According to senior SVR officer Sergei Tretyakov, the KGB was responsible for creating the entire nuclear winter story to stop the Pershing missiles.[3] Tretyakov says that from 1979 the KGB wanted to prevent the United States from deploying the missiles in Western Europe and that, directed by Yuri Andropov, they distributed disinformation, based on a faked "doomsday report" by the Soviet Academy of Sciences about the effect of nuclear war on climate, to peace groups, the environmental movement and the journal AMBIO.[3][4] Another successful example of Soviet disinformation was the publication in 1968 of Who's Who in the CIA which was quoted as authoritative in the West until the early 1990s.[5] Media

Conspiracy theorists often accuse governments of spreading disinformation in a "war for your mind" but also sometimes accuse each other of being "disinformation" agents. One publishing company, The Disinformation Company, actually focuses on current affairs seeking to expose disinformation, and has been involved in television series, conferences and books. Its website collects "the most shocking, unusual and quirky news articles, podcasts and videos on the web," mostly submitted by site visitors. But the Disinformation Company itself has been accused of spreading propaganda (such as 9/11 "Truth" material) by "The Unrepentent Marxist" critic Louis Proyect.[6]

See also 

   Active measures
   Black propaganda
   Counter Misinformation Team
   False flag
   Fear, uncertainty and doubt
   Lie
   Information warfare
   Internet police
   Maskirovka
   Mind control
   Propaganda
   Operation INFEKTION
   Active Measures Working Group

References 

   James (1837), Vol. 2, p.256.
   Roche, vol.1, p.327
   Pete Earley, "Comrade J: The Untold Secrets of Russia's Master Spy in America After the End of the Cold War", Penguin Books, 2007, ISBN 978-0-399-15439-3, pages 167–177
   AMBIO, AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment
   J. Ransom Clark, "Crude, Anti-American Disinformation: "Geheim" and "Top Secret" Magazines: Purveyors of Crude, Defamatory Disinformation"
   "The Real McCain". August 17, 2008. Retrieved July 4, 2013.

Bibliography 

   James, William (1837). The Naval History of Great Britain, from the Declaration of War by France in 1793, to the Accession of George IV. 2. R. Bentley.
   Roche, Jean-Michel (2005). Dictionnaire des bâtiments de la flotte de guerre française de Colbert à nos jours 1. Group Retozel-Maury Millau. ISBN 978-2-9525917-0-6. OCLC 165892922.

External links 

   Disinformation - a learning resource from the British Library including an interactive movie and activities

[show] 

   v
   t
   e

Media manipulation [show] 

   v
   t
   e

Propaganda techniques [show] 

   v
   t
   e

Soviet Bloc disinformation in the Cold War Categories: 

   Communication of falsehoods
   Black propaganda
   Propaganda techniques
   Psychological warfare techniques
   Espionage techniques

Blocked[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Specifically, you have continued to POV push fringe material immediately after coming off a block for edit-warring over the same material. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

IronGargoyle (talk) 07:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE FROM RENEE00124

Why have I been blocked? I am not using copyright information. I am an author of 4 books on this subject published on amazon.com. I am using links for reference purposes only. I am beginning to perceive Wikipedia as a perception management operation especially after what happened with Julian Assange. Again, why am I blocked for 100% detailing Electronic Harassment in my own voice? Perhaps what you are mistaking as copyright infringement is the result of extensive research done by me to write the books. Again, why am I blocked again??????Renee00124 (talk) 18:36, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're blocked for going straight back to the article you were blocked for editing before and pushing your own point of view. Exactly as the above block notice said if you had taken the time to actually read it.
I am not entering into a discussion with you as to whether your point of view is correct since it is pointless talking with someone so obviously paranoid. Short version, your conspiracy theories have no place on wikipedia.
If you have a serious interest in contributing to Wikipedia, try an unrelated topic. GDallimore (Talk) 13:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE FROM RENEE00124

This is obvious disinformation. What has happened here is that someone decided to create a bogus article to manage the public's perception, of the heinous official crimes being committing against U.S. citizens before someone created an accurate, fact based article related the new paradigm of Electronic Harassment today in the militarized police state / military technology happening from state-of-the-art operation centers today and destroying many lives. I am totally not surprised that you would question my input as paranoid after a scant article that is in itself a copy and pasted. Labeling anyone as mentally ill, speaking the harsher truths, has served to keep these programs, literally under the radar and will to allow a human guinea pig program to flourish. You ought to be ashamed of yourself using Wikipedia this way. You people teaming up on me and refusing to allow credible historical information, documenting official patents of technology, the laws approving its use after 911, etc., are not the real patriots. Those of use placing our lives on the line are. You are cowards who are using Wikipedia to create a false public impression and after the Julian Assange incident I would not be surprised if you are part of the problem, STRATEGICALLY, and not the solution.Renee00124 (talk) 18:36, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. There's a New Sheriff in Town!Renee00124 (talk) 18:36, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly[edit]

Hello Renee00124. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 23:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Renee00124&oldid=1141048220"