User talk:Rhal zahi
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Billy Meier. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 08:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi again and thanks for your message on my talk page. Wikipedia has a clear Conflict of interest policy, so as the above paragraph says, if you feel that your own work is useful and should be included in the article, then you should suggest it on the article's talk page where other editors without a conflict can decide and if they agree, can add it for you. You can do this using the Template:Request edit. Thanks, Melcous (talk) 23:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Billy Meier[edit]
 | Your recent editing on Billy Meier is suggestive of someone editing with a WP:AGENDA. Please remember to remain neutral when adding to or removing material from articles. Remember that any claims of fact that are not of a purely uncontroversial nature must be supported by citations to independent reliable secondary sources. Sources that promote fringe theories are rarely considered reliable. See also Fringe Theories. Thank you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC) |
My intention is to make this page Neutral. If I have an agenda is to present several opinions to keep it neutral. Currently this page is not neutral and it has several statements based on links that does not exist.
Rhal Zahi
Alert[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Your edits to the Vogel and Meier articles promote a fringe point of view, which is impermissible on Wikipedia. Guy (Help!) 20:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)