User talk:Richard Doherty

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Richard Doherty, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:56, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Second Battle of Alamein[edit]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. If you want to change the name of this battle you need to gain a consensus by opening a discussion in the article's talk page. At present it runs through the whole of Wikipedia as the second battle. The article's name is Second Battle so refering to it in the article as #3 is just confusing and unhelpful! To change it you need better reasons than just making it so. Stephen Kirrage^{talk - contribs} 19:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to RMS Titanic may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Edward Pemberton Leach may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|birth_place=[Londonderry]], [[Ireland]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Military History[edit]

Greetings to Wikipaedia. Are you the Richard Doherty who writes books? Landing at Cape Helles might interest you, if you fancy a little light copy editing.Keith-264 (talk) 09:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious also -- are you indeed the author, historian, and iconoclast Richard Doherty? If so, I am overjoyed that you have joined the Wikipaedia community. Yours, Quis separabit? 19:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Willie Doyle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

duties in an outstanding fashion for almost two years, he was killed in the Battle of Langemarck (Third Ypres, known commonly as Passchendaele, on 16 August 1917, having run “all day hither and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to RAF Coastal Command may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RAF Coastal Command, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ebrington Barracks[edit]

Hi - I noticed that you removed some carefully sourced material from this article and replaced it with material which was neither sourced or properly linked. Please can you read our guidelines, particularly WP:SOURCE, carefully. You are free to add properly sourced material to the article but not to remove material which is already properly sourced. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi in return,

I'm not sure what your standards are for describing material as 'carefully sourced' but what I removed from the Ebrington article was highly inaccurate, e.g., no American soldiers were based there during the Second World War; James VII/II did not build a star fort there in 1689, information regarding the use of the barracks was completely wrong (it was not the base of the 27th (Inniskiing) Regiment or the 109th). What I replaced it with is accurate information. I have no idea how to show attribution on this site, however.

Hi - On the 27th and 109th are you saying that the Department of the Environment of Northern Ireland is wrong? And on the star shaped fort are you saying that the article by Simon Tait in the Independent on Sunday is wrong? These sources surely would meet the standards required by WP:SOURCE. I have now added in the material on the Cheshire Regiment and the South Wales Borderers (with sources) which is very welcome. Dormskirk (talk) 22:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

Yes, I am saying that neither the 27th nor the 109th were 'originally' based at Ebrington. (Incidentally the Department of the Environment is now simply that; it doesn't have 'of Northern Ireland' included and hasn't had for many years.) DoE has produced some highly inaccurate material on this and other subjects to do with the City of Londonderry. I suspect that they believed they were describing the Childers-linked Royal Inniskilling Fusiliers but the 109th was the 2nd PoW's Leinster Regiment (RC); the Inniskillings' second battalion was the 108th. What makes you think an article by Simon Tait in a newspaper is an authoritative source? The only star-shaped fort on this site was built in the 19th century and I spent much time explaining to Ilex staff (including their then CEO) that this was so. King James VII/II was never on the east bank of the Foyle. The Cheshires did not join the BEF; the force that went to France in August 1914 was the Expeditionary Force. The 'British' prefix was added only in the autumn of 1914 to distinguish from the Indian Expeditionary Force which arrived at that time. The French port at which the Cheshires landed is correctly le Havre - French place names with a definite article use lower case letters - le Havre, le Mans, les Andelys; the authority is Michelin and the AF. How and why could a barracks be used as a fuel and munitions depot? RN and RCN ships refuelled from a tank farm at Lisahally and drew munitions from NAD Kilnappy, safely out in the country and protected by blast walls in case of accident. There is so much wrong with this article that it would be better scrapped. Your reliance on inaccurate and unreliable sources adds to the arguments of those who treat Wikipedia with distain. As an editor I would not allow an author to cite Wikipedia as a source but would encourage him/her to seek another source that would be regarded with some respect. As an author I have found Wikipedia useful on occasion as a guide to a proper source. Anyone writing about Ebrington or the Siege of Derry, for example, would be well advised to stay away from Wikipedia on those grounds.

Hi - I am trying to work with you but your comments are unhelpful in the extreme e.g. "there is so much wrong with this article that it would be better scrapped." Some of us work very hard to make wikipedia helpful to the reader! I know you are new to wikipedia but if you "have no idea how to show attribution on this site" I would encourage you to read the guidelines including WP:SOURCE before editing. I understand your view that the DoE has produced some highly inaccurate material but you have produced no alternative sources. It is sometimes easier to prove a positive than a negative: do you have any alternative information on where the 27th and the 108th were based (including a source)? Was it St Lucia Barracks? Dormskirk (talk) 20:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Richard Doherty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]