User talk:Ricoculous

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to The Skeptic (UK magazine). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:22, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1) I added two paragraphs of content, all of which can be verified by using the references already available within the page. Please present any evidence suggesting the content was unreliable, or alternatively, don't copy and paste generalised criticisms.

2) You state it is recommended, not obligatory to discuss potentially controversial edits. I did not however think the edit would be controversial - the explanation I provided for the edit was valid.

3) All edits were, and will be genuine. Read and fact-check before blindly deleting.

Ricoculous. I think there may be a Conflict of interest in making any edits to this article. If you are no longer working for the magazine, etc, that would be a different. Please refer to the link to make sure there are no direct conflicts, then if there are, only add to the discussion page and not the main article please. There seems to be no problem if you do, or don't declare COI and are not directly involved with editing the main page, you can however add to discussion with references and leaders, it seems. Skeptic sid (talk) 00:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]