User talk:Rikfriday
Welcome!
Hello, Rikfriday, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Victuallers (talk) 11:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
hi again[edit]
You're welcome. Good luck with your project Victuallers (talk) 13:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
Hi, i do need help:
- (cur) (last) 12:10, 20 September 2008 24.6.189.234 (Talk) (11,793 bytes) (→Etymology) (undo)
- (cur) (last) 12:08, 20 September 2008 24.6.189.234 (Talk) (11,864 bytes) (→Fashion) (undo)
- (cur) (last) 12:07, 20 September 2008 24.6.189.234 (Talk) (12,128 bytes) (→Locations) (undo)
this user deleted all my referenced information on the origin and derivation of the term cybergoth from a game company in the UK in 1988 and all my photos of cybergoth kids at Death Guild in San Francisco
I think there needs to be a separate page for CyberGoth as CyberKids (rave/trance) and CyberGoths (goth/industrial) kids both hate eachother and continue to delete each the other's content in favor of their own.
They attend opposite club and music scenes and they do not mingle.
If San Francisco Cybergoths are a unique culture, there should be a separate page on this subject which I have written before, but somebody moved it to Cyber (subculture) and deleted the entire page.
It's like having a page called Teen Music Lovers and puttting an article about how the Mods and the Rockers all hang out together, or the hippies and the punks run around and party together all night.
Putting them on the same page confuses the reader and there are several references to that face in the discussion page from previous years. Nobody know one from the other.
thanks if you can help.
I prefer the idea of a separate page on San Francisco's Death Guild club which is strictly a CyberGoth club. Nobody likes or listens to trance/rave and trance/rave or 'cyberkid' tourists who come to the club waving their glow sticks now and then are looked upon as a severe source of iritation. The main cybergoth boy who works in the cybergoth fashion industry and sells cybergoth clothes on Haight Street in San Francisco, is a semi-professional sharpshooter and when he practices on the shooting range, he uses 'trance-raver cyberkid photos' as targets.
It's easy to understand if you come to compare the clubs in person, and I think i did a good job of separating the stylistic differences, but I would rather have a seaparte page for Death Guild if we are unique in the world, there is no reason why this rising counter culture should be deleted if the rest of the world is living in the past and prefers to maintain their status quo self image.
thanks again. PS we don't have tildes on our computers here. (Rikfriday (talk) 13:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)).
- First of all, please read WP:ORG, the notability guideline for organizations, and tell me how you think they meet it. Just saying it's notable doesn't make it so. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 15:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Cybergoth[edit]
If you have a good argument why that should be included, take it to Talk:Goth subculture. Zazaban (talk) 01:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
You have virtually no idea what you are talking about. That girl is barely 18, she doesn't know what fetish even means.Kids have been wearing bondage/fetish gear as a social statement since PUNK Rock fashion was invented and it has nothing to do with sex. it's a joke. (Rikfriday (talk) 13:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)).
Hi again[edit]
Sorry missed your message. Have another try? When you are ready. Remember there are 2.5m articles! Victuallers (talk) 11:43, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
Sorry I hadn't heard of this rule against too many reversals of vandalism. A user was randomly deleting encyclopedic references to the information relating to the origin of the term "cybergoth" and all the photos I contributed to the Cybergoth fashion page with no explanation whatsoever. They've been up for a month and were excellent photos and examples of the style.
He deleted several of my referenced sections, but mainly the photos are classic examples of this new style of dress.
There seems to a war against "cybergoths", who are goth/industrial club goers and "cyberkids" who are Trance/Ravers over the word Cyber. there are constant deletions on this page leaning toward erasing cybergoths and adding cyberkids. the word Cyberpunk actually stradles the two genres but has no meaning in the world of club music whatsoever.
I think the two pages should be separated into Cyberkid (trans/rave subculture) and Cybergoth (goth/industrial subculture).
The two factions are warring music factions who HATE eachother and have virtually no interest in either one or the other's music or style.
Every person at Death Guild dresses CyberGoth. The type of Cyber Clothing at Trance Rave Clubs in Europe and Canada which is refered to as CyberKid is unknown in this City.
It is absurd to continue to lump two opposite music cultures into the same page merely because they have the same prefix.
I began to edit the page because a 'Cyberkid' deleted all references to CyberGoth and Cyberpunk entirely and rambled about himself and his friends at his trance/rave club in his city.
I replaced the terms and added referenced explanations of the derivations of the terms and now somebody else is deleting references, explanations and info about the origin of cybergoths repeatedly giving no explanation whatsoever. So i reversed his deletions.
I put all the Cybergoth information on a separate Page earlier this week and somebody moved them all back to the Cyber (subculture) page for no reason.
I would rather they be on a separate page. i will call in Cybergoth, as the 'goth page' has deleted the info on Cybergoth which I added to current contemporat subculture boundries and the Cyber page continues to do the same.
These categories of music and fashion are warring clans who do no get along or go to the same music clubs and have a few accessories in common, but they do not attend the same clubs or otherwise blend with eachother in any way, shape, or form. It is well known at Death Guild, that all the regulars are highly disturbed when some glowstick waving tourist from europe or canada comes wandering in dancing with some annoying glowsticks and flashy things and appears to think they are attending a rave/trance club.
If San Francisco CyberGoths are a unique style of Cybergoths in the world, which may well be the case, as the information I enter about this scene, then I should be allowed to enter the data on a separate page, in reference to the city or purely the nightclub "Death Guild" which may be a unique instance of the birth of a new counterculture which the other cities may not understand whatsoever. It's happened here before. San Franciscan have their own style and taste and have frequently been on the cutting edge of fashion and music in the past 50 years.
The people who attend the nightclub are mostly centered around Haight Ashbury, the birthplace of American Rock and Roll in the 1960's. (Rikfriday (talk) 13:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC))
September 2008[edit]
Sorry I hadn't heard of this rule. A user was randomly deleting encyclopedic references to the information relating to the origin
of the term "cybergoth" and the Photos I contributed to the Cybergoth fashion page with no explanation whatsoever. They've been
up for a month and were excellent photos and examples of the style.
He deleted several of my referenced sections, but mainly the photos are classic examples of this new style of dress.
- Sorry guy, but the style in your picture gallery wasn't new. The pictures showed only a handful of simple Goths. And Goths look like the people on your photos since 25 years. There was nothing Cyber and there was nothing new. --Ada Kataki (talk) 09:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
There seems to a war against "cybergoths", who are goth/industrial club goers and "cyberkids" who are Trance/Ravers over the word Cyber. there are constant deletions on this page leaning toward erasing cybergoths and adding cyberkids. the word Cyberpunk actually stradles the two genres but has no meaning in the world of club music whatsoever.
I think the two pages should be separated into Cyberkid (trans/rave subculture) and Cybergoth (goth/industrial subculture).
The two factions are warring music factions who HATE eachother and have virtually no interest in either one or the other's music or style.
Every person at Death Guild dresses CyberGoth. The type of Cyber Clothing at Trance Rave Clubs in Europe and Canada which is refered to as CyberKid is unknown in this City.
It is absurd to continue to lump two opposite music cultures into the same page merely because they have the same prefix.
I began to edit the page because a 'Cyberkid' deleted all references to CyberGoth and Cyberpunk entirely and rambled about himself and his friends at his trance/rave club in his city.
I replaced the terms and added referenced explanations of the derivations of the terms and now somebody else is deleting references, explanations and info about the origin of cybergoths repeatedly giving no explanation whatsoever. So i reversed his deletions.
I put all the Cybergoth information on a separate Page earlier this week and somebody moved them all back to the Cyber (subculture) page for no reason.
I would rather they be on a separate page. i will call in Cybergoth, as the 'goth page' has deleted the info on Cybergoth which I added to current contemporat subculture boundries and the Cyber page continues to do the same.
These categories of music and fashion are warring clans who do no get along or go to the same music clubs and have a few accessories in common, but they do not attend the same clubs or otherwise blend with eachother in any way, shape, or form. It is well known at Death Guild, that all the regulars are highly disturbed when some glowstick waving tourist from europe or canada comes wandering in dancing with some annoying glowsticks and flashy things and appears to think they are attending a rave/trance club.
If San Francisco CyberGoths are a unique style of Cybergoths in the world, which may well be the case, as the information I enter about this scene, then I should be allowed to enter the data on a separate page, in reference to the city or purely the nightclub "Death Guild" which may be a unique instance of the birth of a new counterculture which the other cities may not understand whatsoever. It's happened here before. San Franciscan have their own style and taste and have frequently been on the cutting edge of fashion and music in the past 50 years.
The people who attend the nightclub are mostly centered around Haight Ashbury, the birthplace of American Rock and Roll in the 1960's. (Rikfriday (talk) 13:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC))
Re: Your helpme requests[edit]
Hi there. What seems to be occurring is considered a content dispute. You should discuss the content on the talk page of the article in order to gain consensus for whether or not it should be included. As for the three-revert rule, the only exception is the reversion of blatant vandalism. The removal of content by someone who does not feel that the content should be in the article is not blatant vandalism, it is a content dispute...see WP:3RR. You may also wish to take a look at WP:DR. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 15:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Re: Your helpme requests[edit]
there is always a dispute on that page over the word cyber being used for Trance/Ravers and Cyber being Cyber Goths.
They are unrelataed and don't mix and hate each other and should be on different pages.
I made a separate page for cybergoth and it was moved by an unknown person to the cyber page and then deleted.
(Rikfriday (talk) 21:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)).
The Da Vinci Code[edit]
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to The Da Vinci Code, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.
In addition, employing second-person writing ("you", "yours"), unless in a direct quote, is not appropriate for an encyclopedia, as indicated by WP:YOU.
If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 16:54, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. Please do not edit war with other editors, or revert their removal of your edits, unless you can cite a valid, policy-based rationale in your edit summary, which you failed to do when you reverted my removal of the material you had added to The Da Vinci Code article. If you wish to edit on Wikipedia, please familiarize yourself with its guidelines and policies (some of which I linked for you above), and adhere to them. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 03:20, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
The article The Dual Mirror Language of Leonardo Da Vinci has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- appears to be original research; references given do not support the theory
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 16:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of The Dual Mirror Language of Leonardo Da Vinci for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Dual Mirror Language of Leonardo Da Vinci is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dual Mirror Language of Leonardo Da Vinci until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem of joy (talk) 18:13, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Maya Clock of Spirals and Spheres[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Maya Clock of Spirals and Spheres requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Σ talkcontribs 22:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
September 2011[edit]
Your addition to Maya calendar has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rik Friday[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rik Friday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bihco (talk) 18:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Attribution[edit]
Re your recent edits to The Last Supper (Leonardo da Vinci): it is well established here that necessary and sufficient attribution of images is provided by the image description page, in this case commons:file:DaVinciCodeSolution.jpg. If you disagree, I suggest you ask your copyright lawyer to contact the Wikimedia Foundation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Very reluctantly I have to admit that a) the CC licence says: attribution "as specified by the author" and b) you have requested attribution beneath the thumbnail. I consider this highly unusual but do feel free to ask at Wikipedia talk:copyright problems whether we accept these terms (and where I shall propose deletion of the image as blatant promotion of a non-notable fringe theory by the author of that theory). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)