User talk:Rinkumaurya

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Rinkumaurya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sababbi Mangal, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wgolf (talk) 16:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sababbi Mangal[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sababbi Mangal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 16:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sababbi Mangal has been reverted.
Your edit here to Sababbi Mangal was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3UMniFnLy4) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Unique World Records Logo.svg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Unique World Records Logo.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:01, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Unique World Records. Praxidicae (talk) 20:05, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was updating content for information as Unique World Record is not fake its 100% genuine that why big brands like Reliance, cognizant and Government Ministers are applying directly.

For the Information regarding India Book of Records, you can search on Internet they are asking everyone other fake which is not the case. Even their owner Biswaroop roy is also famous for so many frauds.

As you are undoubtedly aware, that this organization is the well-known and recognized authority on record breaking achievements. They maintains online registry on the achievements and certifies amazing human feats, incredible achievements in the nature of world records. I recently became aware of this concern named India Book of Records and that they have published in their official website in the following link http://www.indiabookofrecords.in/fraudrecordbooks/, http://www.indiabookofrecords.in/fakerecordbooks/ that Unique World Records / Unique Book of World Records is a false/fraud/fake company/firm/concern which is however, not the case. From a bare perusal of India Book of Records, i find that they are misleading the people by creating a false impression that UWR is fake/fraud/false, which is not that case. Further research on their website disclosed that they are trying to mislead the public/prospect clients and achievers of amazing human feats that “India book of Records” is the only recognized book in the country and that other concerns are totally fake, which is unethical and we strongly condemn the same. It is clearly apparent that they have intentionally hosted the false information in their official website to spoil the goodwill and reputation of other bodies. Their malafide is further amplified by their false claims that they are claiming to be the only National Recognized authority on record-breaking achievement, which is not true. In view of this, members of the trade and relevant public including prospective applicants, would be under the mistaken belief that our client is fake/false/fraud, which is not true, thereby causing irreparable loss and damage not only to people, trade and business but also resulting in harnishment and erosion of distinctiveness hard earned by “Unique World Records”. In this regard i would like to bring it to your notice that : Unique World Records has secured the Registration and Certificate of Incorporation as a Public Limited Company with Registrar of Companies, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India with the CIN: U74900PB2014PLC038743 and the Big Joke is India Book of Records is not registered company. Unique World Records is known the world over for verifying record-breaking achievements through a process of authentication based on a proprietary database of record information. Individuals and organizations from many countries in the world regularly apply to have their achievements verified by UWR because of its reputation for authenticity and fairness in verification. From the aforesaid it is clearly apparent that India Book of Records is making illegal benefits by felicitating the world record holders with false/untrue information and the false information is published with a view to associate themselves with UWR registered record holders. Recently Reliance Jio, Cognizant and Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, India got Unique World Records and they never invited India Book of Records because Government and big corporate know what is genuine and what is fake. I hope you understand the scene.

Kindly revert the page i have some links to update like http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2019/aug/27/tamil-nadu-government-launches-an-exclusive-channel-for-school-children-2024606.html

Yours sincerely, Rinku Maurya

India Book of Record is going wrong see more...https://www.bcmtouring.com/forums/threads/india-book-of-records-false-certification.74501/ https://www.consumercomplaints.in/india-book-of-records-asia-book-of-records-world-record-university-fake-doctor-issues-fake-doctors-cheating-public-c1933432 https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/shifting-gears/205942-false-certification-india-book-records.html https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/haryana/hony-doctorate-comes-for-a-price-at-this-varsity/462097.html

https://www.consumercomplaints.in/india-book-of-records-asia-book-of-records-world-record-university-fake-doctor-issues-fake-doctors-cheating-public-c1933432

https://m.tribuneindia.com/article/hony-doctorate-comes-for-a-price-at-this-varsity/462097/amp

https://www.bcmtouring.com/forums/threads/india-book-of-records-false-certification.74501/

https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/shifting-gears/205942-false-certification-india-book-records.html

https://www.consumercomplaints.in/fake-world-records-university-issues-fake-doctorates-for-records-c1939170 Rinkumaurya (talk) 22:05, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning[edit]

Bombing an article with a bunch of random links is not how Wikipedia works. A topic may be criticized with reliable source, providing that WP:WEIGHT is observed. If you continue to make disruptive edits, like link bombing non-reliable source without any accompanying text, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I shared link you can help me how to show it because I seen other page affected due to single link that was too wrong link but I shared genuine link Can u elaborate Rinkumaurya (talk) 22:13, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 22:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Unique World Records Logo.svg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Unique World Records Logo.svg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sababbi Mangal for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sababbi Mangal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sababbi Mangal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Biswaroop Roy Chowdhury, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Skynxnex (talk) 04:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fake Profile, this person is doing illegal activities and should not be made famous to cheat more people attached cyber crime compnaint Rinkumaurya (talk) 04:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]