Jump to content

User talk:RissederEngel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi RissederEngel, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Good luck, and have fun. --Lwarf Talk! 10:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Switzerland national under-21 football team[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox next time. -- Matthew_hk tc 08:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Hello RissederEngel, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for creating articles on Swiss football. Perhaps you may be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Football, a project by football fans around the world to improve Wikipedia's coverage of football. If you have any questions on Wikipedia, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. AecisBrievenbus 22:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Majstorović.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Majstorović.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Uploaded images[edit]

Hello. I have just deleted a fair number of images you had uploaded about various football players. These images are copyright and as such can only be used under very specific conditions, one of which is that the image be irreplaceable. Typically, images of living footballers can reasonably be expected to be replaced by free equivalents. Let me know if you have any questions about this. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 06:23, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Players in Bold[edit]

Hello, I have noticed that you bolded the players in the FC Basel current squad, the consensus at WP:Football is that this should be avoided. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs for more details. If you have any problems with the policy feel free to raise them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football, Regards, King of the North East (T/C) 21:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article was actually a fork of Swiss Super League#League Champions, so I don't really know why it should be restored. I might technically restore it, but I would immediately open an AFD for it, which in my opinion would be likely successful, given the circumstances. Tell me if I'm wrong (but I don't think so, given the fact I make a comparison of the two articles before writing these words to you). --Angelo 00:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop[edit]

stop If you keep vandalizing pages as you did here, you will be blocked. Please stop. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wait i am confussed all i did there was continue the discussion about Samet Gündüz saying:

sorry i am new at this and i copyed what the one above said thinking it was addressing the person i was saying to. sorry for putting your signature, it was an honest mistake. but the reason i ask about it was before the article was deleated when Samet Gündüz was on the second team of basel. which ment before he was in the thrid tier of swiss soccer and never received any senior caps from the main FC Basel team so he was not that important and i agree that article was right for deletion. However, he was just promoted up the the main team on FC Basel and will be getting much senior caps. so before when the article was deleted i understand it should have been however the sercomstances have changed and the reason for the prior deletion has diminished (because he is getting senior caps) and i feel that the article should exist. User:RissederEngel 12:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


how is that vandalizing a page. nothing mean was said nor anything untrue. like isn't that the point of a talk page? i am just wondering why you delted the article again when the sercomstances have change. Like it is a senior team ranked in the top 50 in europe (i believe #42) so i do not understand why you are not letting the page and also when i conituded the talk you say i am vandalizing the page...? if you want we can talk on my page? like with the reasons i am presenting why are you still not putting the page back User:Rissederengel) 16:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New users don't change archive bot counters, remove archive links and skillfully, selectively delete text from others' talk pages. You've been warned. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i sware i did not touch that part of the page like all i did was write "sorry i am new at this and i copyed what the one above said thinking it was addressing the person i was saying to. sorry for putting your signature, it was an honest mistake. but the reason i ask about it was before the article was deleated when Samet Gündüz was on the second team of basel. which ment before he was in the thrid tier of swiss soccer and never received any senior caps from the main FC Basel team so he was not that important and i agree that article was right for deletion. However, he was just promoted up the the main team on FC Basel and will be getting much senior caps. so before when the article was deleted i understand it should have been however the sercomstances have changed and the reason for the prior deletion has diminished (because he is getting senior caps) and i feel that the article should exist. User:RissederEngel 12:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)" like if i wrote that then does it automatically changes it? (i ask because i do not want to mess up again). and will you please put back the article? or was the counter chanegd from before when i acedently put your signature? for if that is the case i already apologized for it and i do not know why you are threatening me now for a mistake which was made before User:RissederEngel) 17:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The diff speaks louder than. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what? i am sorry i don't understand what "the diff speaks louder then" means =/, sorry my english might not be that good. user:RissederEngel 17:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:FC Basel vs St Gallen.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:FC Basel vs St Gallen.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.20min.ch/sport/fussball/story/17343671. As a copyright violation, File:FC Basel vs St Gallen.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:FC Basel vs St Gallen.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 06:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello RissederEngel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Simone Grippo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Swiss club location.PNG[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Swiss club location.PNG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grasshopper-Club Zürich.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grasshopper-Club Zürich.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:YoungBoysLogo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YoungBoysLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass93! (what I've been up to/drop me a ___) 14:31, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]