User talk:Roaming27

Welcome

Hello Roaming27, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions (I noticed the Queanbeyan edits), they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Naming conventions

Manual of Style

As a contributer to Australian articles, you may may like to connect with other Australian wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' noticeboard at WP:AWNB.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~ ; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Thank you for signing up!

A Y Arktos 09:47, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Donald Black

Just letting you know I reverted your move and changed it to Donald Black (sociologist) which is correct according to our manual of style. Thought you should know - I assume you are creating a disambiguation page now at Donald Black? Thanks Glen 06:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I've done the nuts and bolts for you at Donald Black, only problem is currently there are no other Donald Black articles on Wikipedia? (unless I can't use the searhc tools correctly!) Can you shed any light? Glen 06:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

PS; Nice to meet you, I'm a Kiwi so we're kinda neighbours? :)

Amateur Radio Service (ARS 1)

{{help me}}

Amateur Radio Service already exists at this site - Amateur Radio. I'm fairly new here so I'm not sure what to do next. I was attempting to learn about how to wikify articles - Category:Articles that need to be wikified Roaming27 05:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

What's your question? What can I help you with? Add the {{helpme}} template back when you've asked so I know to check back. — Deon555^talk_Review 05:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

still learning (ARS 2)

{{help me}}

Hi Deon, someone has created an Amateur Radio Service article, but one already exists here - Amateur Radio. I attempted to redirect but it didn't look right, so I'm not sure what to do next. Roaming27 05:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

So you're saying you want Amateur Radio Service to redirect to Amateur Radio ? — Deon555^talk_Review 05:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

radio (ARS 3)

{{help me}} I'm new and I wasn't sure whether the article should be redirected, deleted or what. I would like someone to tell me / show me what to do with the two articles. I'm on a learning curve :-) Roaming27 05:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Greetings Roaming27! It appears that you are needing to redirect the article to Amateur radio. You can do this by just putting

#REDIRECT [[Amateur radio]]

in the Amateur Radio Service article. I have gone ahead and done this for you, if you have any more questions please feel free to add {{helpme}} to your talk page again. --Skywolf 05:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

RE thx

No worries :D — Deon555^talk_Review 05:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

list of people from Texas

{{help me}}

hmmm, I'm still having problems with redirecting. I've redirected 'Category:People from Teaxs' to 'List of people from Texas'. But the information in 'Category:People from Teaxs' hasn't been moved. Do I need to copy it in or what? Plus the Category 'People from Teaxs' still shows at Oberia Coffin. Thank you Roaming27 07:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Categories and Lists are two different beasts. A list is like a regular article that you can just edit. A Category is an automatically compiled table of all articles wich contain a certain tag. Look for [[Category:People from Teaxs]] in the Oberia Coffin article. And see Help:Category. Simply moving a category to a list cannot work, and I'd suggest against it. Let the category live, it can even be more useful than a list (check out this category search tool). --Dschwen 07:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

cont.

{{help me}}

Thank you Dschwen, now how do I correct the typo in 'Category:People from Teaxs'? And how do I undo the redirect of the category to the list? Roaming27 07:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

I nominated the mispelled category for speedy deletion, also changed the mispelling in the article. In cases where the article doesn't ned to go through a long debate process to be deleted, you can insert the

   {{deletebecause|Reason}}

tag in the article, or in this case category. --Skywolf 07:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry I completely overlooked the spelling mistake, but Skywolf answered that. Don't redirect the category to the list, there is a link in the category header, that is enough. If people want to see the list they can click it. If the want to see the category you shouldn't prevent them from doing so. --Dschwen 09:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Trisha Alexander

I moved the article on Trisha Alexander to Patricia Kay. See the talk page for more information. --Anthony5429 03:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Your welcome. And thank you for using my {{Reflist}} template. Happy WP'ing! --Anthony5429 06:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Calis (novel)

Someone created a Wikipedia link for "Calis (novel)". It's spelt wrongly, so I tagged it with {{deletebecause|Reason}} and gave my reason. However, the page still exists and the tag has been removed, huh? What steps do I need to take next? Roaming27 05:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

You can move the page by pressing the 'move' tab at the top of the page, or if it is a link and not an article then you can simply change the link, hope this helps. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 06:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Note however that Calis (novel) does not exist. Which page were you talking about in this case? Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 06:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Elizabeth Austin AfD

Hi, I noticed you had created the Afd for the Austin article. Looks like you did all the steps correctly; I've never quite figured it out myself as to all the steps which must be followed. One step which is appreciated by editors who have created or worked on an article is for you to notify them by a post on their user talk, so they don't miss the discussion of the article they are interested in. Another aspect of that is if an article is controversial (I have not seen evidence this one is, except for one major deletion of material by another editor shortly before you added the AfD) and one contacts editors to let them know about the Afd, it is best to make the notification neutral in tone and to notify editors on both sides of the issue. Thanks. Edison 14:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Parkes, NSW

I added a new section to Parkes, New South Wales and now the references to the whole article have disappeared, yet they still show when I click on "edit this page". What have I done wrong? Roaming27 23:32, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Fixed. You closed the last ref you inserted with <ref> instead of </ref>. Xiner (talk, email) 23:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. We all need help sometime. Xiner (talk, email)

Flower Pot Men

{help me} When I click on the Flower Pot Men discussion page it diverts me to the The Flower Pot Men (band) discussion page instead. Roaming27 06:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Good point, I have deleted the redirect that was causing the problem.--Commander Keane 06:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Redlinks

I suggest you give up on Wikipedia now if you think we shouldn't do something just because it is time consuming. There are so many people adding vanity entries for themselves on the year articles that if people weren't deleting them all the time the articles would rapidly become unusable. If you want a greater explanation than that I'm removing such redlinks from these articles in my edit summary - the policy is to remove redlinks, I'm removing redlinks. "rm redlinks" would therefore be perfectly sufficient explanation. Average Earthman 08:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Victoria

No problem :) DuncanHill (talk) 01:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday, Roaming27, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a nice day!

-- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 19:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Donald Black (author)

The article Donald Black (author) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no significant coverage in independent reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 16:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Survey

Hi Roaming!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 22:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Donald Black (author) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Black (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Black (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The-Pope (talk) 02:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Roaming27! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:54, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Roaming27! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by: Visiting our website for resources, events, and more Meet other women and share your story in our profile space Participate at and "like" our Facebook group Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience! Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Roaming27. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Roaming27. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Roaming27. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)