User talk:Rockkooky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Baboon has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

April 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ross School (East Hampton, New York) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ross School (East Hampton, New York). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.   Tentinator   15:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ross School (East Hampton, New York) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 16:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ross School (East Hampton, New York). Wikipelli Talk 16:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Elockid (Talk) 17:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rockkooky (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I made the edits that got me blocked in 2010 when I was much younger and immature.Rockkooky (talk) 21:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per Origamite's note below, your disruptive edits were from April of this year, not 2010. Unless you're admitting to socking as well? Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You seem to be a few years off; you were not blocked in 2010, but in April 2014. How much have you matured in 7 months? Origamiteis out right now 22:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]