User talk:Rod Oliphant

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Rod Oliphant! Thank you for your contributions. I am WereSpielChequers and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Ϣere SpielChequers 19:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Laurence Oliphant (Scottish politician)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Laurence Oliphant (Scottish politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 20:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Laurence Oliphant (Scottish politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laurence Oliphant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article for creation - Thomas Oliphant[edit]

Thomas Oliphant (musician and artist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sionk (talk) 05:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Laurence Oliphant (Scottish politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Perth

The Ash Grove (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Thomas

Thomas Oliphant (musician and artist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to All Through the Night

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Thomas Oliphant (musician and artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ash Grove (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Lushington[edit]

The article James Lushington has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. B music ian 01:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry St George Tucker[edit]

A tag has been placed on Henry St George Tucker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LegacyOfValor (talk) 07:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Peers[edit]

A tag has been placed on Charles Peers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LegacyOfValor (talk) 07:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Russell Ellice[edit]

A tag has been placed on Russell Ellice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LegacyOfValor (talk) 07:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William Devaynes[edit]

A tag has been placed on William Devaynes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LegacyOfValor (talk) 07:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lancelot Oliphant[edit]

A tag has been placed on Lancelot Oliphant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 07:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Oliphant (musician and artist)[edit]

The article Thomas Oliphant (musician and artist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References on this article are gibberish. I count only 1 real reference; the rest are not entered properly. Should this be fixed, article could be retained, but i also see it is not a noteworthy person

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 07:43, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Balcraig Castle[edit]

The article Balcraig Castle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks citations

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 07:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've opposed the deletion, because references have now been added. All the same, the references can be improved. Sionk (talk) 12:32, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Lushington[edit]

A tag has been placed on James Lushington requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 07:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William Wigram[edit]

A tag has been placed on William Wigram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 07:50, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Laurence Sullivan[edit]

A tag has been placed on Laurence Sullivan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 07:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Smith Burgess[edit]

A tag has been placed on John Smith Burgess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 07:54, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elliot Macnaghten[edit]

A tag has been placed on Elliot Macnaghten requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacob Bosanquet[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jacob Bosanquet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 07:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Shepherd (governor and chairman)[edit]

A tag has been placed on John Shepherd (governor and chairman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 07:58, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Peers[edit]

A tag has been placed on Charles Peers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 08:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Russell Ellice[edit]

A tag has been placed on Russell Ellice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 08:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry...[edit]

About all those speedy-deletion nominations - they have all been declined by me or by another administrator, and I have explained to the over-enthusiastic New Page Patroller why they were not appropriate. Apologies and regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JohnCD, Please can you also look at Thomas Oliphant (musician and artist). He wrote "Deck the Halls with Boughs of Holly" (that alone makes him highly noteable), he has an entry in the Dictionary of National Biography. He wrote the chorale for the king's wedding. He translated portions of Wagner's opera "Lohengrin", which were then conducted by Wagner. What am I supposed to do to save this entry? If the article needs improving, then I need someone else to help me.Rod Oliphant (talk) 10:56, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've opposed the new deletion request on the Thomas Oliphant article. Hopefully the proposer will see sense and not take it any further. However, I agree with them that the article requires a bit of cleaning up. In particular, sources should give sufficient information to allow other people to verify the facts. Several of the sources need to be expanded, so other readers can know where to look. For example " National Library of Scotland" does not explain what source you referred to. Published books should generally cite the author, title, publisher, date of publication/edition and ISBN number (if one exists). See WP:CITE. Hope that helps you! Sionk (talk) 12:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Written before I read Sionk's note above.) That was a WP:Proposed deletion or "PROD", and the template message at the top explained that, because that method is intended for uncontroversial deletions, anyone (including you) could prevent it by simply removing the template. Deletion would only take place if after seven days no-one had objected. In fact I see that someone else has already dePRODded the article. Once dePRODded, an article cannot be PRODded again; it may still be nominated by a more deliberate process at WP:Articles for deletion, which involves a seven-day debate. I'm afraid Wikipedia's procedures can seem rather Byzantine at first, but there are usually human guides available: Wikipedia:A Primer for newcomers is intended as a one-stop guide. JohnCD (talk) 12:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sionk and JohnCD, I will work on Thomas. The problem sometimes is that when one copies the url. it does not always take you back to that specific page - you have to go to the site first. I can certainly put in book details. I did get a lot of help with Thomas before the page was put up.Rod Oliphant (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JohnCD, Please could you look at John Shepherd (governor and chairman) and see whether any of the tags can now be removed. Many thanks.Rod Oliphant (talk) 01:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have also added more to John Smith Burges and I wonder whether the tag there could be reviewed as well please?Rod Oliphant (talk) 01:59, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Laurence Sullivan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ashburton

Richard Jenkins (MP) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to George Tomline

William Devaynes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Francis Basset

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the first of these: this edit shows you what was involved, making the link go direct to the correct target, rather than to a disambiguation page. The message above was from a "bot", one of a number of helpful automatic systems that do useful maintenance tasks. JohnCD (talk) 12:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JohnCD I need your help in a rather more complicated manner. I created the page for Laurence Sulivan spelling his name with two "l"s viz. Sullivan. That was the way that it was recorded in one source of records for the East India Company. I am now convinced that it is wrong and should be Sulivan with one "l". There will be a few links to other pages which will have to be corrected as well. I do not know when the right time would be to make the change - I seem to be in the eye of a lot of storms. I did actually discriminate between those chairmen of the EIC who had no other factors to indicate notability - that I could find.

The point is that they were all eminent men - or they would not have been on the court of Directors in the first place. The point is that many of the other chairmen are probably notable for other reasons besides being chairmen of the EIC - I just have not found that yet. There is an argument that a company which governed more people than any country in the woirld (with the exception of China) is notability enough. These chairmen were more powerful than practically any world leaders of their time. As another page on Wiki says, one fifth of the world's population lived in areas where trade was controlled by the EIC - only slightly less were actually governed by them.89.168.126.84 (talk) 14:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry too much about all the "maintenance templates" on the articles. New articles are created at a rate of rather more than one a minute, many of them are nonsense, libellous, hoaxes, or about completely un-notable people or things, so there is an (unofficial, volunteer like everything here) New Page Patrol who look at new articles to see whether they need zapping or improvement. It is a vital but thankless task, some of them are inexperienced, and also so much rubbish comes in that it is all too easy to get into a frame of mind where instead of "Is there a possible article here?" one thinks "How can I get rid of this?" The NPP-ers cannot themselves delete anything, tagged articles get added to a list which is patrolled by a second line, administrators like myself, and a good part of our time is spent educating NPP-ers and explaining why their tags are inappropriate. That's all background to the fact that you unfortunately encountered a particularly over-keen NPP-er this morning. You can see reading down from here on his talk page how he has been given feedback.

The boxes at the top of articles are "maintenance templates" indicating areas for improvement; they add articles to various lists which may bring others in to help. I have removed most of them from Laurence Sullivan - I agree that chairmen of the EIC are notable, he's not living so BLP didn't apply etc. I will look at the others when I have time. They are not an immediate threat.

Regarding Sullivan/Sulivan, I can change it easily and leave a "redirect" from the other spelling, but you say the EIC records have two Ls - do you have sources for one L? Wikipedia:Verifiability is a fundamental policy: "all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source."

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JohnCD, Yes, the constituencies spell his name with one "l" and I have found an alternative source compiled by a more reliable source who used to work at the India Office who took the list back to 1714 and had the spelling with one "l". I trust him more as he was the head of his department within the India Office. The book is "Record of Services of the Honourable East India Company's Civil Servants in the Madras Presidency". I will get more details for you asapRod Oliphant (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have altered Sullivan to Laurence Sulivan. If he is sometimes referred to with two, might it be worth adding "or Sullivan" in the article? If you need to change the title of an article, you can do it yourself with the "Move" tab at the top of the screen. That will leave behind a WP:REDIRECT so that someone clicking on the old title will be taken to the new one. In many cases that is useful, as with Laurence Sullivan; if not, you can tag the redirect for deletion by putting {{db-redirtypo}} or {{db-r3}} (with two curly brackets each side) at the top. JohnCD (talk) 16:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks JohnCD. What swayed me to the one "L" was that the other book was written by Charles C. Prinsep who styled himself as "....Late Superintendent of Records, India Office". I took the view that there could be no higher authority! The other book only went back to 1773 and his book goes back to 1714, so I was also able to greatly extend the list of Chairmen and Deputy Chairmen. I have not been through yet to see who amongst the earlier Chairmen were notable, nor have I linked them to pages for the same (if such pages apply). I will do so tonight. I have to say, although I believed that all the pages which I created were justifiably notable, I shall be slower to produce stubs in the future. Today made me realise just how (extra) careful one has to be. Many thanks for your help.Rod Oliphant (talk) 18:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited John Loch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Marjoribanks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Laurence Oliphant, 1st Lord Oliphant may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

There is no further mention of Lords Oliphant for over forty five years until Laurence (his father died young in a feud between the Ogilvies and the Lindsays at Arbroath and Laurence's

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:48, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Crystal Palace at Sydenham, drawn by Thomas Oliphant.pdf[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Crystal Palace at Sydenham, drawn by Thomas Oliphant.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but because I own the original drawing, there is no license required. I also am the owner of the scanned image of the drawing. I will investigate to see what appropriate tag can be used.

Disambiguation link notification for February 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Olifard, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Forth and Clyde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David Olifard[edit]

Hello Rod. Nice job with David Olifard.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 01:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Brianann. Are you descended from David Olifard? Rod Oliphant (talk) 16:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, no relation that I know of. I just had the clan article on my watchlist, and noticed you wikilinking to David's article. The twelfth-century phenomenon of the Scottish crown settling 'Normans' into Scotland fascinates me. It would have been an exciting era I think. Anyway, this link might be of interest to you, it shows some of the primary sources that David is recorded in [1]. I love being able to actually hunt down primary sources and read them; sometimes they seem to bring out the flavour of the era.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. It is interesting to get a glimpse of what people went through but people's lives must have been unbelievably turbulent and hard, compared with our times - no different from world wars but unenviable nonetheless. May I ask about the clan article. Is there an area of concern? Is there something which I can go in and fix? I have not really had much to do with it but I could do so if you wanted? Rod Oliphant (talk) 01:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Olifard has been accepted[edit]

Walter Olifard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Musical Society of London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Goss. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Rod Oliphant. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Rod Oliphant. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

William Fitz Osbern[edit]

Hello Rod
Thanks for your note; sorry for the delay in replying! As for William Fitz Osbern, I'm afraid I know very little about him, only what I've read in David Crouch's book (he gets a mensh on about 9 pages) and what can be extrapolated from that. It's probably significant that William's son didn't get the Earldom after he died; the Earldom of Wessex was a big fiefdom, and William (the Conqueror) was keen to break up any power blocs that would threaten his position (as he and his duchy was to the king of France, in fact). Did you have anything in particular in mind? Swanny18 (talk) 22:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Swanny18, I tracked down David Crouch and he was of some help. That William FitzOsbern was Earl of Wessex is practically unrecorded oin Wikipedia, so I have been doing the rounds inserting it. My interest is familial because there seems to be quite a lot of evidence that William's father sometimes went by the surname Olifard.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rod Oliphant. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Bruce moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Elizabeth Bruce, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JC7V (talk) 04:31, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JC7V. I have drastically added to the article and put in references and, where the links do not work sufficiently, I have also quoted page numbers so that the references can be verified properly. I would like to explain the thinking behind the creation of this page as well. There is another page which is incorrect, namely Robert the Bruce, where they wrongly cite Elizabeth as illegitimate. I do feel that the page is ready now. Regards, Rod Oliphant (talk) 17:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Bruce has been accepted[edit]

Elizabeth Bruce, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 10:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]