User talk:RogerPhilipChappell

This is RogerPhilipChappell's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roger Chappell Author (July 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lightbluerain was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Add more references to the submission. Also, you don't add external links as such in the middle of the article. See HELP:References and WP:External links for help.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roger Chappell Author and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lightbluerain (Talk💬 Contribs✏️) 11:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RogerPhilipChappell! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lightbluerain (Talk💬 Contribs✏️) 11:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, RogerPhilipChappell, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Lightbluerain (Talk💬 Contribs✏️) 11:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Writing about yourself[edit]

Writing about yourself is not prohibited, but all information must be verified by references published by people with no connection to you. If such references are not available, then your best path is to request the draft be deleted, per the instructions you got at Teahouse. David notMD (talk) 12:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi RogerPhilipChappell! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Deleting an article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Roger Chappell Author[edit]

Hello, RogerPhilipChappell. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roger Chappell Author, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roger Chappell Author[edit]

Hello, RogerPhilipChappell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Roger Chappell Author".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:00, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You said it couldn't be accepted, because it couldnt be "verified by references published by people with no connection to you". Although it could be verified if you wanted to, you just need to visit the publisher's website and look up Time Slicer book and then read the author BIO (https://www.shawlinepublishing.com.au/search/display/247-time-slicer). RogerPhilipChappell (talk) 04:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]