User talk:Roguewitch

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Roguewitch, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 00:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

June 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Randall Anthony Jonas has been reverted.
Your edit here to Randall Anthony Jonas was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://confessionsfromthemagicmountain.blogspot.ca/2014/04/randall-jonas-photos.html, http://randallajonas.blogspot.ca/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Randall Anthony Jonas[edit]

The article Randall Anthony Jonas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent, reliable references about the person. Only social media and an article written as a grad student. Unable to find anything else, but name is common.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 05:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have read all of the helpful feed back from everyone working on the page and many things are improved. I hope you will have a look at it now as it is better than before. I myself am new to Wikipedia and so all comments are appreciated and all suggestions, corrections and additions are also welcome. I am learning.22:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Roguewitch (talk)

Roguewitch, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Roguewitch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roguewitch (talk) 22:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Thank you! I am doing my best to create my first article and many people have helped. It improves with each edit.[reply]

Nomination of Randall Anthony Jonas for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Randall Anthony Jonas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randall Anthony Jonas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 16:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roguewitch (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)The article is much revised and improved thanks to comments and contributions. I have done my best to check each day and edit to the best of my capacity.[reply]

Constant Thanking[edit]

Rougewitch, I'm glad that you're grateful for my edits to Randall Anthony Jonas, but could you please stop spamming my notifications box with your thanks? It would be much appreciated. Thanks, Bensci54 (talk) 22:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roguewitch (talk) 22:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)I was not aware of spamming. When I go back to the page it at times says I have not thanked people. As such, being a new person here, I am assuming that the thanks are refreshed. It is unintentional. And so have the errors been. Roguewitch (talk) 22:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]