User talk:Romanilin

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Romanilin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! triwbe (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Leonid Perlovsky, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. triwbe (talk) 18:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:LeonidPerlovsky 2003 Picture.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:LeonidPerlovsky 2003 Picture.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

J Milburn (talk) 12:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Knowledge instinct[edit]

I have nominated Knowledge instinct, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge instinct. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Guy (Help!) 20:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Knowledge instinct[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Knowledge instinct, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jagun^Talk_Contribs 01:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Knowledge instinct[edit]

I have deleted the article Knowledge instinct as there is no content. I noticed the message that you'd passed on an email regarding copyright to Wikipedia. I advise you to continue from there when you get a reply. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 07:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Knowledge instinct[edit]

I have nominated Knowledge instinct, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge instinct (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 13:36, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Computational intelligence since the 1950s: Complexity and logic[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Computational intelligence since the 1950s: Complexity and logic, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computational intelligence since the 1950s: Complexity and logic. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? McWomble (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Logic and the mind[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Logic and the mind, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logic and the mind. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Neural modeling fields is also nominated for deletion in the same discussion. McWomble (talk) 13:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leonid Perlovsky for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leonid Perlovsky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonid Perlovsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 13:18, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]