User talk:Rombler

Not using a neutral point-of-view, adding your own commentary[edit]

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the information is reliable and verified.. ¿what is the problem? Rombler (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Being casually described as "king of reggaeton" by one publication does not merit inclusion in the WP:LEDE as such. Furthermore, that article is almost 10 years old.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, but the the rest information is correct.. Rombler (talk) 16:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, there was nothing useful in your edits. "The artist was recognized for Billboard as one Reggaeton Legend also was recognized for Rolling Stone as one Reggaeton Legend and Icon" is poorly written and not not useful, and the remaining portion of your edits seemed to be just unnecessarily duplicating references. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

well i can fix it, the information is reliable and correct.. Rombler (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The "King" stuff is already covered in the "Career" section and doesn't belong in the WP:LEDE. If you have other suggestions for the article, please take them to the talk page first and seek a consensus. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning for violating NPOV and introducing grammar mistakes[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

We require written competence in the English language; please consider contributing to the Wikipedia corresponding to your native language. Additionally, you dont seem to understand the other problems with your edits despite numerous warnings. If you resume making the same sort of edits when this block expires, you will be blocked again for a longer duration. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

undertand, the onblock the my acount,i ask for an opportunity.. Rombler (talk) 21:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You'd need to appeal from your original account, User_talk:MaikoltheGangale, though that would be a waste of time given the amount of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT and WP:CIR issues that are evident. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rombler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reason and block of the my acount, not should have evaded block in acounts in several years and month, understand the reason for "sockpuppet", I Want to contribute the project, i want to reach a consensus, i ask one unblock for fix the problem, and i promise to improve. My original account this blocking https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MaikoltheGangale

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, you need to appeal from your original account, User_talk:MaikoltheGangale. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

¿how do i do that? Yes not i have the account original.. Rombler (talk) 22:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie: The user cannot appeal from their original account as it - and all their other accounts - is globally locked. This account should also be globally locked, but someone needs to request that at Meta. I hate doing that, but I may make an exception. Not that it's required for each account, but this account has also edited at es.wiki, which means there is again cross-wiki abuse.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie: ::@Bbb23: ¿Not can be appealed of this account? -- Rombler (talk) 23:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not ping me again. You're questions have already been answered, and I'm not going to repeat myself. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

¿what should i do? How i can access the my account.-- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MaikoltheGangale Rombler (talk) 02:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:MaikoltheGangale per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MaikoltheGangale. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 10:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]