User talk:RomneyGingrich12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You removed the neutrality tag and continue to add Oxendine content to this article. For example, stating that someone is a father in the opening sentence is completely unencyclopedic. Further, removing my hidden comment that a mention of his party switch needs to be added is inappropriate. Your bias is showing. Qqqqqq (talk) 06:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The election results section is a nice addition, but I think you know good and well that calling someone a father is not worthy of the introduction to an encyclopedia article on that person. Every person ever born is a son or daughter, and most are parents as well. Not relevant, except as political propaganda—something you'd see in an ad or on a flyer. As far as noting his switch of allegiances goes, you should discuss such things on the discussion page for the article first (tab called "talk" near the top of the article) rather than merely removing my concern. While I know that there is no official voter registration by party in Georgia, Oxendine worked closely with a number of Democrats, and I seem to recall that he at least formed an exploratory committee to run for statewide office as a Democrat before an intraparty spat caused him to run as a Republican instead. I'll find a source and add this to the article. As far as communicating goes, you did fine in responding on my talk page, yeah. Qqqqqq (talk) 07:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm I can't really find a source that mentions his falling out with Zell Miller in 1993-4 that prompted him to jump ship. I certainly won't add mention of this unless I can find something. It would be nice to have sources for the election results section (I assume SoS website) so that readers could, say, look up county-by-county results, too. Until tomorrow, then. Qqqqqq (talk) 07:23, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --98.154.26.247 (talk) 06:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RomneyGingrich. Wait, when did I revert your edits? There's been some trouble from an anonymous user that keeps revering my edits, too. Qqqqqq (talk) 06:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GO look, you just did, like 5 minutes ago. Sorry.
Where do you mean? I see that User:98.154.26.247 reverted one of your edits, though. Qqqqqq (talk) 06:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, you just made the same change as did the anonymous user. You wouldn't happen to be the same user, would you? Qqqqqq (talk) 06:23, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what you are speaking about. I am trying to revert it back to where it was before you undid my change at (cur) (prev) 06:09, 22 June 2009 Qqqqqq (talk | contribs) (20,082 bytes) (Ok, look, removing all of my copy-editing and cleanup templates is vandalism. Having put them there in the first place is not vandalism. Please see WP:3RR.) (undo)
Oh, I see what you mean. My edit summary there was addressing User:24.98.228.92, who kept undoing my copy-editing of the article. I don't think any of your edits from just before that were removed, were they? Qqqqqq (talk) 06:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your question about a photo here: Talk:John_Oxendine#Picture. I hadn't seen your question before; sorry! I think it would be great to have a picture here. If you want, I can contact the campaign, or you can, either way. Qqqqqq (talk) 06:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative[edit]

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi RomneyGingrich12! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:54, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)![edit]

WikiWomen - We need you!
Hi RomneyGingrich12! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

  • Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
  • Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
  • Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
  • Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
  • Reading and writing for our blog channel
  • Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
  • Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]