User talk:Ron2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Durham NC[edit]

Hello, it appears that you have some knowledge of Durham, North Carolina. WikiProject Durham NC would like to invite you to join us and expand Wikipedia's information on Durham.

Thankx with the help on Dre. You must be a Soulja Boy fan like me :-). Happy editting.. STAT- Verse 00:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm no fan at all. I saw a jacked-up article, Googled all I could find on it, and wrote it up. :D ron2(talk) 03:11, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are messages for you at Talk:Dre (album) STAT- Verse 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism[edit]

listen. im not vandalising. im simply telling people about the current social infection of minorities in this school. i go here you dont. so u dont know what goes on. theyre a disease. a virus. they spread through our city first raising crime rates and taking jobs. but that wasnt enough. they came into our school and pollute it. they raise our drop out rate lower our standard of education. would you like to know why seperate but equal cant happen? because they arent socially fit to make that happen. anywhere they go becomes another ghetto or shithole that society frowns upon. its not vandalism ITS THE TRUTH —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leavesforthehealing (talkcontribs) 15:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

jokes[edit]

There is no need to be rude here on wikipedia, and there is certainly no need to lie. The bible Is a fiction book, as I stated as such. Just because you disagree with the truth doesn't make the edit vandalism. TheiGuard (talk) 03:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I used a template warning. How can it be rude when I'm not using my own words? You inserted PoV vandalism into an article. I reverted the vandalism and warned the vandal. See Wikipedia:Cleaning_up_vandalism for the procedure I followed. As far as the issue you are confused on, you may see [1], [2], [3], or [4]. Sorry for not taking your edit seriously, but saying the Bible is fiction is a joke to me. ron2(talk) 14:06, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, to you. But it's the truth, as I stated. Wikipedia is not yours. I have reported you. TheiGuard (talk) 17:00, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Another joke? Well, thanks for reporting me. If I did something wrong in the process of handling vandalism I'd like to know. Anyways, I suggest you read WP:NPOV before your next edit, for tips on how to write in a neutral tone. ron2(talk) 17:51, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest you read the introduction to wikipedia. TheiGuard (talk) 21:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Introduction? Okay, now you read it: Changes to controversial topics and Wikipedia's main pages should usually be discussed first. If you don't think the Bible is a controversial topic, you're smoking crack. Or you may want to read the first two of Wikipedia's five pillars? ron2(talk) 02:32, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor[edit]

As a previous volunteer at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor I though you might like to know there is a new set available for work at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor/20100826. Hope to see you there. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:46, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States[edit]

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 01:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects[edit]

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited
Seattle Public Library
  • Date Saturday, December 8, 2012
  • Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
  • Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
  • Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
  • Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
  • Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration.

Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Guilford County Schools (logo).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Guilford County Schools (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]