User talk:Roskau

This is Roskau's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Peter Behn has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter Behn. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes[edit]

If you have no personal connection to Peter B., how did you come by two quotes that were either not referenced or referenced to a document that did not have the quote? David notMD (talk) 18:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have identified the quotes (one cut, the other still in the draft) as from IMDb. IMDb is not considered a reliable source because anyone can add content there. Delete the quote. Having the quote is grounds for the draft being declined. David notMD (talk) 07:42, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Peter Behn has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter Behn. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Behn (October 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Behn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peter Behn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roskau! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Bunny Levine. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Derwishi10 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Derwishi10. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]