User talk:Runescrape

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Runescrape, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 05:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Ryk72. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Christina Hoff Sommers that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please try to focus on content, not contributor. Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 05:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand how that could be construed. However, it was intended as a suggestion - I really do think the best way Bernstein can achieve his stated goal of not attracting negative attention to the article would be to leave. Given his history and the fact that this is a BLP, nothing good can come of his continued presence.--Runescrape (talk) 16:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Acroterion (talk) 17:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 01:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is what he had to drop everything and block me for. It was, of course, reverted immediately after.--Runescrape (talk) 01:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm already blocked by Gam-Gam it seems. Never even seen his Twitter account, no surprise that he's using a blockbot hahaha. Sethyre (talk) 07:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Check out that wonderful uninvolved enforcement log. I mean, is it any wonder that GamerGate page is about how mistreated rich white people with hair dye are?--Runescrape (talk) 01:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haha oh wow. My blocker is one of Gam's buddies. He's also the guy who protected the BLP page during all of this and covered for Gammy. No wonder he had to block me!--Runescrape (talk) 01:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]